Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590

Our best bits.
User avatar
Psychic
Emeritus
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by Psychic » Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:44 am

Thanks for posting your thoughts Parksey. I think you'll appreciate that the accusation of cheating seems to have gained weight when the main names that were brought to attention in the thread were all Bluehats. It doesn't really matter I suppose, what's done is done.

Just out of interest, what made me a suspect in your eyes? I played this game how I've played every other AYA?, (Not very well :lol: )

User avatar
Cuttooth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by Cuttooth » Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:45 am

So the thing that "changed the game" didn't actually change much at all.

User avatar
Psychic
Emeritus
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by Psychic » Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:47 am

:fp:

Corazon de Leon

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by Corazon de Leon » Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:49 am

In fairness, the old crone gooseberry fool didn't do a right lot at all - the dead seers powers didn't work, and the whole thing was a bit of a rabble. The only thing that came from it was Parksey's suspicions being a bit better looked at.

User avatar
Captain Kinopio
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Memento Mori
Location: The Observatory

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by Captain Kinopio » Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:50 am

You know this is the first AYAW where I didn't finger a Werewolf/BH or have an instrumental role in getting one lynched.

Yet it's the first time I won :lol:

I think I finally got the knack of this villager malarky

Last edited by Captain Kinopio on Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Time for adventure
User avatar
Oh Teh Noes
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mina Murray
Location: HMS Camden Lock

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by Oh Teh Noes » Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:50 am

Deadpool wrote:In fairness, the old crone gooseberry fool didn't do a right lot at all - the dead seers powers didn't work, and the whole thing was a bit of a rabble.

It put BLADEFORCE 2 in contact with each other and ensured my legacy.

Dr Cottle wrote:My favourite flavour of popsicle is DICK.
Corazon de Leon

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by Corazon de Leon » Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:51 am

Oh Teh Noes wrote:
Deadpool wrote:In fairness, the old crone gooseberry fool didn't do a right lot at all - the dead seers powers didn't work, and the whole thing was a bit of a rabble.

It put BLADEFORCE 2 in contact with each other and ensured my legacy.


:lol: at the second part. In complete fairness, if that's the best thing that came from the fiasco then I'd say it's about comparable with the Chalkitdown EAS fiasco, so I don't really see the problem.

User avatar
Psychic
Emeritus
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by Psychic » Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:53 am

Deadpool wrote:
Oh Teh Noes wrote:
Deadpool wrote:In fairness, the old crone gooseberry fool didn't do a right lot at all - the dead seers powers didn't work, and the whole thing was a bit of a rabble.

It put BLADEFORCE 2 in contact with each other and ensured my legacy.


:lol: at the second part. In complete fairness, if that's the best thing that came from the fiasco then I'd say it's about comparable with the Chalkitdown EAS fiasco, so I don't really see the problem.


The formation of a group of known RFM along with fresh suspicions leading to the banning of the EAS led to a RFM victory. Edit: (I'm not saying this is the only reason they won, this was also in part to good organisation and good play)

The Chalky fiasco stopped the game being a procession from the word go.

User avatar
Parksey
Moderator
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by Parksey » Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:56 am

Cuttooth wrote:So the thing that "changed the game" didn't actually change much at all.


Ironically, no. We got very lucky with the bluff. It's why it was suggested. It was felt we needed tangible results, so we pinned our hopes on nailing a bluehat through this false hacking. I was grimacing at the time, when reading how everyone totally feel behind the evidence against Red. I thought we'd got it totally wrong, as she seemed pissed that we'd wasted a hacking. As I've said, I pushed for the false hacking to be against Sykes. It would have came out as a lie even then, as the EAS couldn't be hacked.

That was probably as big a turning point as Sykes-gate, as it made anything a dead RFM said, almost cast iron proof. The crone only really helped us dead members, as we got to learn who was a seered RFM, who the remaining Zeni was and that Drawlight and White Rabbit had special roles.

RE: my list, again. Stu will support the fact that my suspects list was massively long at first. It had as many RFMs as it did BHs, if not many more regular players on it. When it came to disclosing it to the deceased many days later, I just got rid of players who were already dead, to make the whole thing look more accurate.

Sykes, as I've said, I almost had a vendetta against you by the end. I'd convinced myself of your guilt days earlier, and just brainwashed myself into believing it was all watertight. I basically thought you'd commited the classic bluehat tactic of being in the thread regularly, and at all of the major times (lynching, mayoral votes, BH deaths). I thought those posting constantly, or eternally theorising, were just over excited RFMs. I was urgently trying to move away from these people and all the ___-gates. You were the "Mr Nice" in the thread, not suggesting anything groundbreaking, nor making any real friends or enemies. You couldn't be tied to any group of people implictly, out in the thread itself. You were careful, but a little too careful in my eyes, as if you were playing it safe and not crossing too many wires. You always had something to say, but nothing that people could see as sticking you to a certain train of thought or group of people. You weren't anti-pxyl, you weren't pro-Bork or Bladeforce. You had nothing, but in the same way, you had everything. If I was playing it as a BH, I'd probably be doing the same thing.

Totally vague, I know, but I my pursuit of an "out there" suspect led me to you.

User avatar
frogg
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by frogg » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:33 am

Well played folks.

Sweet sigs.

User avatar
G-Rat
Member
Joined in 2009

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by G-Rat » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:54 am

\o/ RFM's!

So yeah, first game of AYA*? and I win! Couple of accusations throughout the game, and even put up for lynching by Aaron. Luckily there wasn't that much evidence against me. Bit annoyed though, cos I missed a big chunk of the middle of the game; the whole dead-day thing, a couple of big bannings and megatons, and wasn't keeping up as much as I'd liked to have later on.

I'd like to apologise to Mocky though. I was convinced you were a BH. :lol:

Overall, superb game. Thoroughly enjoyed myself playing.

o/ TAP. :wub:

Anung wrote:Destroying Japan from the inside like an alcoholic Nagasaki.
User avatar
The People's ElboReformat
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Goat, Zenigame
Location: El Boat of Goat
Contact:

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by The People's ElboReformat » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:56 am

Was asked earlier but not sure if it was answered: What would have happened if we made one of the dead a mayor during Zombie-day?

Image
The Eeveelution club! \o/
User avatar
aayl1
Sir Aaron of GRcade
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by aayl1 » Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:07 am

This was a really good game. Thrilled I survived so long and played my part in killing two of the buggers before I had to go. I didn't really have any alliances, bar a brief interlude with KP and Noes, but that helped keep me alive, I feel.

Oh, and Jebus towards the end fed me theories which were instrumental in gaining trust and indeed getting me mayorship.

Image
Corazon de Leon

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by Corazon de Leon » Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:09 am

Zenigame wrote:Was asked earlier but not sure if it was answered: What would have happened if we made one of the dead a mayor during Zombie-day?


I assume it wouldn't have been allowed, to be honest.

User avatar
That
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by That » Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:15 am

aaronayl1 wrote:Oh, and Jebus towards the end fed me theories which were instrumental in gaining trust and indeed getting me mayorship.


Why, yes, you're welcome. Don't mention it. ;)

Image
User avatar
SpaceJebus
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by SpaceJebus » Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:27 am

Karlprof wrote:
aaronayl1 wrote:Oh, and Jebus towards the end fed me theories which were instrumental in gaining trust and indeed getting me mayorship.


Why, yes, you're welcome. Don't mention it. ;)


:?:

The only name you gave me was Sykes which you also gave to Aaron.

User avatar
Henke
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by Henke » Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:59 am

Too much went in our favour for it to feel right, By that I mean Chalky, Crone and DaLax.

Venom wrote:Great form, great volume, great nips.
So great! :)
User avatar
abcd
Emeritus
Joined in 2008
AKA: abcd

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by abcd » Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:53 am

I stand by everything that Parksey said.

Image
User avatar
Dual
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590
by Dual » Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:55 am

I guess I'll start posting in other threads again.

User avatar
IGM
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You A Bluehat? - Somebody get the mop...
by IGM » Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:00 am

Me, on the first thursday:


IGM wrote:I think forget the regular posters for a day or 2, it's doing us no favours. When we inevitably lynch another RFM we'll end up with no-one contributing. It's inconceivable that so many of the bluehats are posting all the time that we'd stumble across one, so it's time to start looking elsewhere before the game is emptied of regulars.

I'm gonna go up for People's Mod today, on the basis of picking 2 semi-inactives. My 2 candidates are RED and BANJO.

Red has been hovering around posting "just back from..." posts without really contributing. Along with Banjo, a lot of posts about nothing very much, except how long the topic is, stuff like that. Red did ask about the rules a couple of times, but also posted about how previous werewolf games were organised, which is confusing.

Banjo has started posting a bit better, but again to start with was always popping up to complain about the thread without adding anything. He popped in late on to vote for Hexx instead of pyxl for PM giving the jokey reason of not wanting to see pyxl get "drunk with power" or something, only to say a post later that he didn't know what pyxl's plans were anyway.

If people agree with my choices, vote me in. If anyone has any thoughts on who they would go for I am willing to listen before I decide, post in the thread or pm, whatever your preference. But for now, those are my 2.

I think we're being played, and that the bluehats are hardly posting, leaving us fighting amongst ourselves. I do think the anung stuff is credible, but then again we've thought that about half the folk we've banned! (If the vigi were to take him out some time soon we might get rid of the distraction. ;) )

I just want to give us another option in the vote as I think all the candidates will be pretty similar in approach. If we don't get a bluehat under my PMship, at least we haven't got rid of another major contributor.


Damn you guys and your "gates". :lol:

Well done the surviving players, shame about the last bluehat, would have been very interesting as I don't think he had even been mentioned in the last few days before the end. I thoroughly enjoyed both participating and then just reading the thread. Good work TAP.

Image

Return to “Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 219 guests