GRcade

Slow start here, maybe people haven't got roles yet or just playing it safe. I agree inactives is best starting strategy.

[iup=3570864]FatDaz[/iup] wrote:Slow start here, maybe people haven't got roles yet or just playing it safe. I agree inactives is best starting strategy.

Inactives what?

Hang inactives to start with.

In Saboteur he almost got killed day one.

Hello fellow humans, I am not a werewolf.

What? There are no wolves?

not inactive!

[iup=3570874]Jay Adama[/iup] wrote:Hello fellow humans, I am not a werewolf.

What? There are no wolves?

We know you're not a werewolf, but Are You A Vigilante?

[iup=3570783]Luke_25[/iup] wrote:

[iup=3570766]Tomous[/iup] wrote:So the Vigis get as many kills as they have team members?

They'll cut throw the list of players rapidly if there's a decent number of them and a kill isn't found quickly.

I doubt that, there's only about 25 players or something. Unless they're only 2 or 3 of these Tiny Nobbed Vigilante's.

Also went a bit OoT there, the player count is 37 which is actually a decent sized game, still reckon there's less bad guys than normal though.

I too am still here.

[iup=3570864]FatDaz[/iup] wrote:Slow start here, maybe people haven't got roles yet or just playing it safe. I agree inactives is best starting strategy.

I'm thinking it might just be quite a slow game due to the proximity of the last one.

Mommy being first mayor is cool with me.

Hey, will vote for Mommy as it's best to put in inactives at start.

[iup=3570857]Drumstick[/iup] wrote:

[iup=3570744]satriales[/iup] wrote:Maybe there are no normal vigilantes in the game and only the vigi-wolves?

Still, that means Denster's odds of being vigi-killed are even higher than usual

Weren't you personally responsible for one of them (for the LOLs)?

Yeah

I couldn't resist, it was like a tradition. If you were lucky enough to get bullets then you had to point one Denny's way.

[iup=3570690]Denster[/iup] wrote:Please don't kill me.

Just once.

Vigi talk, if you ask me.


Let's get this show on the road, chaps. I'm happy to back Mommy's inactive lynch for tomorrow, do we know how many kills the vigilantes get each night? I'm guessing this game will be shorter than previous AYA? games, given the smaller field and seemingly more do-able victory requirement for the baddies.

Inactives is usually a good shout. I'll vote for Mommy.

I don't even remember signing up for this game. Although I am always keen to kill vampires or whatever

In all the games of this we have played has killing in-actives done anything but reduce the citizen / human count?

Every game that gets played the first move is kill in-actives, I don't see why any baddy in these games would stay inactive as a way of hiding when this will and always happens, they would instead post a few times wait till people are working on suspicion and then go into hiding in the actives or low active people.

I would have thought it more likely people with very low post counts are more likely to be vigilantes rather than just clearing inactive people that give us a little bit of a buffer again the vigilante kills.

I vote moggy for mob leader.

[iup=3570960]Errkal[/iup] wrote:In all the games of this we have played has killing in-actives done anything but reduce the citizen / human count?

Every game that gets played the first move is kill in-actives, I don't see why any baddy in these games would stay inactive as a way of hiding when this will and always happens, they would instead post a few times wait till people are working on suspicion and then go into hiding in the actives or low active people.

I would have thought it more likely people with very low post counts are more likely to be vigilantes rather than just clearing inactive people that give us a little bit of a buffer again the vigilante kills.

Your probably right, but inactive culls just remove those who aren't playing and force wolves / vigis to post. Won't hit lucky but it helps keep the game going.

Don't the wolves/vampires usually have to kill inactives anyway for first couple of days?

We've probably got a better chance if we kill at random rather than choosing inactives.

Fair enough, felt I had to say I have the same grumble to myself usually on every game

Good morning. A few thoughts from last night:

- Lets kill Qikz, he talks too much