Are You A Werewolf? - GAME OVER

Does seem odd that the group went with Edd yesterday on the proviso we could come back to Qikz & TAP today, yet here we are voting on two randomly chosen inactives.

It's like the last couple of days never happened

I haven't seen anything to make me change my position so I'I'll stick with JChalmers and Curls for tonight's lynch.

We may as well be at the start of the game with this going for random in actives.

At least with DBlock and SD up it was two people that are very vocal and in the case of DBlock and nothing other that "yeah vote for me because reasons".

I wont be too surprised if it turns out those two are wolves and using the no evidence vote me me thing as a way of making it seem like they are just daft distracting and so just getting ignored.

PCCD wrote:Does seem odd that the group went with Edd yesterday on the proviso we could come back to Qikz & TAP today, yet here we are voting on two randomly chosen inactives.

It's like the last couple of days never happened

Maybe it's that now a day has passed people have come to realise, much like previously that we're more than likely two villagers who had an argument. Why are you so actively trying to get me lynched when it's been well known by this point that I'm a villager? It seems really stupid and mighty suspicious that you'd rather lynch someone who is a villager than actively go looking for wolves.

DML wrote:To answer abcd's earlier question, I haven't had any contact since. I still have no idea who it was and I look forward to finding out after the game. My suspicion is that there another quirky role out there because the whole thing doesn't scream seer now despite definitely identifying a wolf.

Huh? How do you not know who sent you a message? Am I misreading this?

PANCAKE has selected JCHALMERS and CURLS for today's lynch. Please PM me with your vote for who you want to face the lynch.

Please put the name of the person you are voting for in the title of the PM, i.e. 'Vote JCHALMERS' or 'Vote CURLS'.

The deadline for submitting your vote is 8pm.

PsychicSykes wrote:

DML wrote:To answer abcd's earlier question, I haven't had any contact since. I still have no idea who it was and I look forward to finding out after the game. My suspicion is that there another quirky role out there because the whole thing doesn't scream seer now despite definitely identifying a wolf.

Huh? How do you not know who sent you a message?

They didn't use GR.

I'm pretty sure dblock said somewhere his 'evidence' is that they were on PMs at the same time. I don't know if he's just jumping on the Rik-train with that, though and it's been confirmed Rik wasn't caught out by that but by sheer dumb luck since he was legitimately only just getting his role at the time he was seen.

DML wrote:

PsychicSykes wrote:

DML wrote:To answer abcd's earlier question, I haven't had any contact since. I still have no idea who it was and I look forward to finding out after the game. My suspicion is that there another quirky role out there because the whole thing doesn't scream seer now despite definitely identifying a wolf.

Huh? How do you not know who sent you a message?

They didn't use GR.

Ah k.

Yeah I'm voting for myself.

Tried getting involved with the game but working fulltime it seems to move too fast for me to catch up.

Plus it does feel a little clique at some points with alot of the forum having played previous games, newcomers aren't really introduced to anything. Just my 2-Cents and will probably be ignored anyway

Cheers for running it though Drumstick!

I would have thought it would go without saying, but this game is about deduction and reasoning. Anonymity detracts from this in a big way (unless it is a game where everyone is set up under an anonymous account). To me it’s a grey area, but it isn't playing the game as it was intended to be played so I'm going to ask that anyone communicating with people randomly in any way is off limits. If anyone is doing this please cease and desist. Thanks.

What are the reasons for JChalmers and Curls to be a wolf?

I'm fairly sure they are both just villagers that can't be bothered/don't have time to play and i'm not sure why they've been picked out as our best chance at a wolf.

I'm losing all hope of us winning at this rate!

I'm crunching some numbers at the moment and I may have found a pattern that could be worth following...

Qikz wrote:Maybe it's that now a day has passed people have come to realise, much like previously that we're more than likely two villagers who had an argument. Why are you so actively trying to get me lynched when it's been well known by this point that I'm a villager? It seems really stupid and mighty suspicious that you'd rather lynch someone who is a villager than actively go looking for wolves.

"It's so obvious that I'm a villager" said the Alpha.

PCCD wrote:Does seem odd that the group went with Edd yesterday on the proviso we could come back to Qikz & TAP today, yet here we are voting on two randomly chosen inactives.

It's like the last couple of days never happened

The idea was that the seer group would check them out and try to get the message out, that doesn't seem to have happened though. I don't really know why we're going after the inactives. We're just creating more loose ends when we haven’t tied up the old ones. I think Pacman is fair enough to put this platform forward, but I’m surprised it won, I don’t see why this was the most appealing platform…

....go on

satriales wrote:I'm crunching some numbers at the moment and I may have found a pattern that could be worth following...

You're full of gooseberry fool.

You said I voted I have never voted yet.

Your stats are just like your face....ASS

...go on

Dblock wrote:

satriales wrote:I'm crunching some numbers at the moment and I may have found a pattern that could be worth following...

You're full of gooseberry fool.

You said I voted I have never voted yet.

Your stats are just like your face....ASS

I've got you down as no votes, but you ran for mayor on day 2.

abcd wrote:...go on

I'm still looking into it, but on the first four days there were ten mayor candidates.

Nine of these ten voted against Riksilver being lynched.

Edit: Just to clarify, this is mayor candidates who have not been killed yet. And also a couple of names repeat so there aren't ten different people.

satriales wrote:

abcd wrote:...go on

I'm still looking into it, but on the first four days there were ten mayor candidates.

Nine of these ten voted against Riksilver being lynched

I've been trying to find patterns as well. But I'm starting on people I suspect, and trying to find correlation.

However, smart wolves would no doubt cover their tracks, so I'm probably going down a blind alley.