Avengers: Age of Ultron. Out now.

TigaSefi wrote:I still think Spidey 1-3 Sam Raimi version pisses over the "done too soon" reboot films.

Banjo wrote:

Denster wrote:

Frank wrote:

Denster wrote:b) that natural loving bond would never be experienced by her and thus making it more likely she would be a more efficient and inhuman assassin. They removed a natural nurturing ability and trained her to kill. Hence she is a monster. Irreparably changed with no way of ever fully becoming a normal, loving woman

"All women want in life is a child, and therefore all women who can't have children are less than human"

Making an argument where one doesn't really exist - GRCADE since 08.

You're removing one facet. One. A facet that has an integral impact on a woman's emotional and nurturing developmental milestones. Coupled with all the other training and techniques.

I'd just argue that it's a really strawberry floating bad line of dialogue.

Qikz wrote:

Mafro wrote:Read up on some of it and apparently it's anger over her being a "damsel in distress". Maybe they need reminding that she was pregnant during filming which would have massively affected what she could do.

Also the fact she was the one who contacted the avengers somehow to say where she was, so she didn't need "saving" as such, just someone to open the door.

Moggy wrote:

Qikz wrote:

Mafro wrote:Read up on some of it and apparently it's anger over her being a "damsel in distress". Maybe they need reminding that she was pregnant during filming which would have massively affected what she could do.

Also the fact she was the one who contacted the avengers somehow to say where she was, so she didn't need "saving" as such, just someone to open the door.

Because girls need a man to open doors for them? You are so sexist.

I saw Ultron for the first time last night. Was pretty awesome I thought, I enjoyed the jokes and thought the action looked good. The Thor pool scene was stupid and should have been cut though.

Qikz wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Qikz wrote:

Mafro wrote:Read up on some of it and apparently it's anger over her being a "damsel in distress". Maybe they need reminding that she was pregnant during filming which would have massively affected what she could do.

Also the fact she was the one who contacted the avengers somehow to say where she was, so she didn't need "saving" as such, just someone to open the door.

Because girls need a man to open doors for them? You are so sexist.

From what I've read it's actually the fact that scene was cut short that it made no sense. Maybe it would've been better to cut it entirely, but I'd like to see the full thing.

Moggy wrote:

Qikz wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Qikz wrote:

Mafro wrote:Read up on some of it and apparently it's anger over her being a "damsel in distress". Maybe they need reminding that she was pregnant during filming which would have massively affected what she could do.

Also the fact she was the one who contacted the avengers somehow to say where she was, so she didn't need "saving" as such, just someone to open the door.

Because girls need a man to open doors for them? You are so sexist.

From what I've read it's actually the fact that scene was cut short that it made no sense. Maybe it would've been better to cut it entirely, but I'd like to see the full thing.

How long do you want them to spend over a door being opened for a poor defenceless girl?