BBC News Presenter Feels A Right Tit

Ironhide wrote:

Blue Eyes wrote:

Karl wrote:

Blue Eyes wrote:I can't have it. It's weird enough to reach for her breast in the first place, but he grabs under her jacket and leaves his hand there for a long strawberry floating time while pushing her away. He could easily have grabbed her shoulder and moved her on, but no, he looks right at her and grabs her boob. I hope that woman reports him for sexual assault.

Do you really believe this? It's incredibly obvious that he just doesn't realise where he's touching. He barely even looks at her, and he's focusing hard on keeping the interview going.

I do, yes. The way I described it is not OTT. He literally looks at her and grabs her boob. He would at least have quickly stopped touching her there if it was accidental, but he didn't.

There's a massive difference between sexual assault and what happened here, I find it horrifying that a simple unfortunate incident like this could potentially land someone in serious trouble and ruin their career and reputation.

Edit: my sig really doesn't help in this thread.

You're right. Flaunting baubles and all of the other tropes of Christmas, in mid-May no less? How can we take you seriously as you defend this rampant pervert?

Time to cancel the TV licence etc.

Lucien wrote:

Blue Eyes wrote:

Karl wrote:

Blue Eyes wrote:I can't have it. It's weird enough to reach for her breast in the first place, but he grabs under her jacket and leaves his hand there for a long strawberry floating time while pushing her away. He could easily have grabbed her shoulder and moved her on, but no, he looks right at her and grabs her boob. I hope that woman reports him for sexual assault.

Do you really believe this? It's incredibly obvious that he just doesn't realise where he's touching. He barely even looks at her, and he's focusing hard on keeping the interview going.

I do, yes. The way I described it is not OTT. He literally looks at her and grabs her boob. He would at least have quickly stopped touching her there if it was accidental, but he didn't.

It's actually insane you think that's sexual assault.

Why? He's groped her breast and kept his hand there for a creepy amount of time. That is sexual assault.

Blue Eyes wrote:

twitter.com/BenBrownBBC/status/864493546975440901

Well, you would say that you rapist.

strawberry floating hell.

Can't tell if Blue Eyes is joking or not :/

Preezy wrote:Can't tell if Blue Eyes is joking or not :/

I'm really not but clearly I'm in the minority here thinking this. I'll stop banging on about it now.

People still don't get Dual

It doesn’t look much like sexual assault to me. He pushes her back to allow the interview to continue and then holds her there to stop her butting in again. She gives him a slap while laughing and the whole thing seems like wholesome family entertainment.

I’d say it was a funny story rather than something equivalent to those videos of Jimmy Savile on ToTP groping girls in plain view of the cameras.

Lucien wrote:

Moggy wrote:It doesn’t look much like sexual assault to me. He pushes her back to allow the inter to continue and then holds her there to stop her butt. in again She gives him a slap while laughing and the whole thing seems like family entertainment.

I’d say it was a funny story rather equivalent to those videos of Jimmy Savile on ToTP groping girls in plain view of the cameras.

What's the matter now?

Lucien wrote:

Moggy wrote:What's the matter now?

Don't think you read the above.

I read it, I just wasn't sure why you were so angry that I called out Jimmy Savile for groping on Top of the Pops.

Lucien wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Lucien wrote:

Moggy wrote:What's the matter now?

Don't think you read the above.

I read it, I just wasn't sure why you were so angry that I called out Jimmy Savile for groping on Top of the Pops.

I wasn't. Nevermind.

I'm winding you up you left tit.

*Staydead defense*

Albear wrote:*Staydead defense*

*Dblock attack*

Moggy wrote:

Albear wrote:*Staydead defense*

*Dblock attack*

*buffalo dance*

Blue Eyes wrote:

Preezy wrote:Can't tell if Blue Eyes is joking or not :/

I'm really not but clearly I'm in the minority here thinking this. I'll stop banging on about it now.

If he was going to intentionally grab a woman's breast, do you really think he would do it on National television?

You're insane.

Zellery wrote:

Blue Eyes wrote:

Preezy wrote:Can't tell if Blue Eyes is joking or not :/

I'm really not but clearly I'm in the minority here thinking this. I'll stop banging on about it now.

If he was going to intentionally grab a woman's breast, do you really think he would do it on National television?

You're insane.

Maybe he gets off on being filmed doing it?

Maybe the sick strawberry float loves getting licence fee payers to pay for his sick fun and games?

Maybe he planned the whole thing in an attempt to show the world just what sort of a man he is, it was a cry for help from a tortured soul that just can't stop.

Or maybe he just held somebody back without realising where he was grabbing them.

Moggy wrote:

Zellery wrote:

Blue Eyes wrote:

Preezy wrote:Can't tell if Blue Eyes is joking or not :/

I'm really not but clearly I'm in the minority here thinking this. I'll stop banging on about it now.

If he was going to intentionally grab a woman's breast, do you really think he would do it on National television?

You're insane.

Maybe he gets off on being filmed doing it?

Maybe the sick strawberry float loves getting licence fee payers to pay for his sick fun and games?

Maybe he planned the whole thing in an attempt to show the world just what sort of a man he is, it was a cry for help from a tortured soul that just can't stop.

Or maybe he just held somebody back without realising where he was grabbing them.

I've many a time had to hold or push back women, the main target area is always the core of the person you are facing, the breasts just happen to be located in this area. It's the natural area that you aim for male or female.

Fair enough. He has plausible deniability so I'll leave it at that I guess. You're all reasonable people I reckon so maybe I'm being too uptight about this.

Plus it's a great excuse to grab some boobs, amirite buddy

Blue Eyes wrote:Fair enough. He has plausible deniability so I'll leave it at that I guess. You're all reasonable people I reckon so maybe I'm being too uptight about this.

I'd say calling him a rapist was going a bit too far, yes.

Zellery wrote:

Blue Eyes wrote:Fair enough. He has plausible deniability so I'll leave it at that I guess. You're all reasonable people I reckon so maybe I'm being too uptight about this.

I'd say calling him a rapist was going a bit too far, yes.

Yep.