OK, so here is the list of nominations made (i.e. the first round of voting each day).
I've assumed that Tsunade, Curls and Vermillion are TYEM. I would have preferred not to, but there wasn't enough data to analyse without that assumption.
The name to the far left is the nominee.
Using this and the voting records, I have just finished the prediction chart below.
The methodology I have used here is that I have assumed that a player would not vote for their own Tribe on tight votes. For example, we know that Clarkman was Pro Village, so on the 22nd where it was a tight interrogation vote between TYEM and Pro-Village, those who voted Pro-Village are unlikely to be in that tribe. Likewise for nominations, where the nominations were tight, I've assumed that anyone voting for somebody of a known tribe would not do so if they were in the same tribe. On less tight votes, or where only one player was up for nomination, I have not made any assumptions from the voting patterns. One flaw in my method is that I havent looked at the position of the vote when any individual vote was made, so ther me may be cases where a dummy vote appeared safe when it was made.
Looks like Nun has done some great work whilst I've been looking at this, so I'm going to add in notes showing whether we agree or disagree on players.
Nun wrote:I think this is my current best guess at the playerlist. I'm fairly confident on almost all of the TYEM team but the pv/vigilante guys could be more interchangeable.
Drumstick - Pro-Village Disagree
DML - Pro-Village Undecided
Site23 - Pro-Village Undecided
Parksey - Pro-Village Agree
Frank - Pro-Village Undecided
Hyperion - Pro-Village Undecided
Jenuall - not Vigilantes -PV? Agree
Vermillion - TYEM (Not Vig, not PV) Agree
Curls - TYEM Agree
Aayl1- TYEM Undecided
Tsunade - TYEM (Not PV) Agree
Preezy - TYEM Undecided
Oblomov Boblomov - TYEM Undecided
DarkRula - TYEM Disagree
Ironhide- Vigilantes (Not PV - posted after mori in silence, not TYEM - early vote on Curls as TYEM) Agree
OR - not pv - vigilantes? Undecided
Pedz - Vigilantes, posted during silence so not PV, early vote on curls as TYEM Undecided
rocsteady Undecided, sawyerpip Undecided, roonmaster Agree, qikz - vigilantes by process of elimintation. Undecided.
For TYEM we have:
Vermillion
Aagree/Curls
Agree Confirmed.
Aayl
Disagree- Cora's suspicion with the naming and also being a poster during silence.
Tsunade
Agree- Confirmed not pv. Voting record is 5 votes cast against vigilante which would be impressive if that's her own allignment.
Preezy
Undecided and Oblomov
Undecided- Preezy's voting record matches TYEM and they were both named by Mori as TYEM along with Tsunade which could explain Mori's death. Mori dying would also coincide with the first day that this team of 7 have posted for 3 days in a row so they would likely be keen to use their kill and several team members were quick to comment after the death which is classic for them watching it coming.
DarkRula
Disagree- this one is probably the longest shot but I believe voting for himself might have been to spread the non-sprouty votes further to try and keep Curls off the ballot. He did vote for Curls as TYEM but at a point where TYEM was very behind so he perhaps didn't expect the late swing. He was also a poster during silence.
At first look, this appears quite mixed and therefore it might be disheartening, but the truth is we will both have made mistakes (I have labelled some players as not TYEM despite the block voting theory and need to review these when I have time). I think it's awesome that we've both put together lists at the same time which we can compare. Even better than that, we have ten players which we've both analysed at the same time and separately come up with the exact same conclusion!
You've looked at things which I have not, so it will take some time to digest it all, but it's time for bed now so that will have to wait for now. The majority of cases where we don't agree I've marked as undecided, which means that I haven't drilled down enough to agree, but certainly I haven't assumed that your conclusion is wrong. In fact, in most of these cases, you've picked one of the two Tribes I have left as a possibility and I would definitely go with what you've said on those cases if we were trying to win a vote against those players. I also really want to look at the ones which we disagree on too, and run your assumptions through my model (especially the ones you are most confident about), in order to see if that reveals anything else.
That feels like we've made some real progress!