Creating Life

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
JK
Member
Joined in 2008

PostCreating Life
by JK » Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:09 pm

Just over a year ago, Dr. Craig Venter announced that his laboratory had synthethised the bare-bones of a living creature using only chemicals found in most biotechnology labs.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/jan/25/genetics.science

The biologist and entrepreneur Craig Venter has announced the creation of a synthetic chromosome, knocking down one of the final hurdles to building the world's first artificial life form.

Venter, best known for his race against publicly funded scientists in the 1990s to sequence the human genome and more recently for hunting the oceans for unknown genes, said the latest work was a "significant but not final step" to creating new life.

In a paper published today in Science, Venter's team described the synthesis of the entire genome of the bacterium Mycoplasma genitalium from laboratory chemicals. The resulting DNA sequence has about 582,000 base pairs of genetic code in 485 genes. Venter said it was the largest artificial sequence ever made, 20 times longer than any previous attempt.

The team at the J Craig Venter Institute (JCVI) in Maryland is working on the final step to create life: transplanting the synthetic DNA into a cell in the hope that it will "boot up" the cell and take control of its growth and reproduction.

The scientists, led by Nobel laureate Hamilton Smith, began by building long strands of DNA, each a copy of about a quarter of the whole M genitalium genome. These were inserted into yeast cells, which stitched together the strands to make clones of the whole genome, named M genitalium JCVI-1.0.

The next step is to insert the synthetic chromosome into a cell, so that it can reproduce and become a new life form. Venter's team has already demonstrated that transplanting the genome of one type of bacterium into the cell of another can change the cell's species, a process his team will now use with the new synthetic chromosome.

Smith said that producing the artificial genome was like finishing the operating system of a computer. "By itself, it doesn't do anything, but when you install it on a computer, then you have a working computer system. It's the same with the genome: the genome is the operating system for a cell and the cytoplasm is the hardware that's required to run that genome."

The work comes out of a larger JCVI effort to discover the minimum number of genes needed for a life form. In its natural state, M genitalium has 485 genes, 100 of which have been found to be non-essential. Synthetic biologists want to use this information to create the most efficient form of life possible, with the fewest genes needed to allow the organism to grow, replicate and proliferate.

Venter said there were two main reasons for the work. "One is trying to understand the minimal operating system of a cell and to understand basic biology. If these experiments are successful we could enter a new design phase of biology by actually constructing chromosomes of a specific nature for a more specific purpose."

Stripped-down designer organisms have huge potential for creating alternative sources of energy or tackling climate change by soaking up carbon dioxide.

Venter has previously claimed that an artificial fuel-producing microbe could be the first billion- or trillion-dollar organism. "When you think of all the things that are made from oil or in the chemical industry, if in the future we could find cells to replace most of those processes, the ideal way would be to do it by direct design."

But Jim Thomas, of the Canadian bioethics organisation ETC group, called for a moratorium. "In the absence of democratic oversight profiteering industrialists are tinkering with the building blocks of life for their own private gain."


This represents a massive breakthrough in the field of biotechnology, but also represents a prickly ethical dilemma. Should we be allowed the create organisms in the laboratory to suit our own ends? Can we be responsible for what we create? And what's to stop somebody creating a deadly disease-causing microbe that is resistant to all known antibiotics and vaccinations?

Is this a natural step in the research process? Or is it simply playing God and the ultimate insult to the sanctity of life?

Opinions, please. Hopefully we can get some decent discussion on this pretty interesting topic.

I :wub: science.

User avatar
Skarjo
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Creating Life
by Skarjo » Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:13 pm

Did they artificially insert some introns or was it purely a cDNA genome?

That's right, I know some gooseberry fool.

By the way; it's just a phase in research, as valid and vital as any other. Scientific discoveries have no moral nor ethical dimension; only what we do with them does.

Karl wrote:Can't believe I got baited into expressing a political stance on hentai

Skarjo's Scary Stories...
User avatar
Mommy Christmas
Multiball!
Joined in 2009

PostRe: Creating Life
by Mommy Christmas » Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:16 pm

What the strawberry float are you on about? In simple language.

:dread:
User avatar
Harry Bizzle
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Creating Life
by Harry Bizzle » Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:41 pm

Should we be allowed the create organisms in the laboratory to suit our own ends? Can we be responsible for what we create? And what's to stop somebody creating a deadly disease-causing microbe that is resistant to all known antibiotics and vaccinations?


How is this any different than regular genetically engineered organisms?

It always struck me that the Ames style testing with antibiotics was never a very good idea, but to be honest I think the risk of creating a microbe with multiple resistancies is a bit unlikely.

As far as I'm concerned, viral vectors are a far more interesting part of genetic engineering. I think once we sort out how to use retroviruses without say, inadvertently causing leukemia by mispositioning genes, it'll be the next big breakthrough for modern medicine.

Did they artificially insert some introns or was it purely a cDNA genome?


Well, if they're trying to make the smallest genome possible, I'd imagine they're leaving out the introns (non coding dna), right?

instagram: @habiz
User avatar
Turok
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Creating Life
by Turok » Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:43 pm

How do you synthesize a molecule as long as a genome? Cause that's what a genome is, right? A single long molecule?

Also, how does this relate to that dude's experiment of the '50es where he synthesized proteins from inorganic molecules and electricity? 1000, double spaced, thankyouverymuch.

Image
User avatar
Memento Mori
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Emperor Mori

PostRe: Creating Life
by Memento Mori » Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:45 pm

I've watched Battlestar Galactica. I see where this is going.

User avatar
Fatal Exception
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Racist chinese lover
Location: ಠ_ಠ

PostRe: Creating Life
by Fatal Exception » Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:47 pm

If God created us in his own image then that surely means we can play god?

The above post, unless specifically stated to the contrary, should not be taken seriously. If the above post has offended you in any way, please fill in this form and return it to your nearest moderator.
Image
User avatar
Turok
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Creating Life
by Turok » Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:47 pm

Fatal Exception wrote:If God created us in his own image then that surely means we can play god?


Just because you look like him doesn't mean you can act like him.

Image
User avatar
Skarjo
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Creating Life
by Skarjo » Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:57 pm

Harry Bizzle wrote:
Did they artificially insert some introns or was it purely a cDNA genome?


Well, if they're trying to make the smallest genome possible, I'd imagine they're leaving out the introns (non coding dna), right?


Well, indeed, but our understanding of introns is in it's infancy, and even it's most commonly accepted explanation (there's always a random chance of mutation, and introns make the chances of seriously important DNA being affected by mutation even less) means that a cDNA organism would be highly unstable.

Karl wrote:Can't believe I got baited into expressing a political stance on hentai

Skarjo's Scary Stories...
User avatar
That
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Creating Life
by That » Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:00 pm

Skarjo wrote:Well, indeed, but our understanding of introns is in it's infancy, and even it's most commonly accepted explanation (there's always a random chance of mutation, and introns make the chances of seriously important DNA being affected by mutation even less) means that a cDNA organism would be highly unstable.


Image

Image
User avatar
Space Viking
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Creating Life
by Space Viking » Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:56 pm

Fatal Exception wrote:If God created us in his own image then that surely means we can play god?


SOURCE?

Lee Adama wrote:You should've been killed back on New Caprica, but since you had the temerity to live, we're going to execute you now.
User avatar
jj_hunsecker
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Creating Life
by jj_hunsecker » Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:02 pm

JK wrote: using only chemicals found in most biotechnology labs.


Are there any chemicals in particular that you wouldn't find in a biotechnology lab? If I lived next door to one, I don't think I'd be going down to Aldi for my daily chemical needs.

User avatar
Oh Teh Noes
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mina Murray
Location: HMS Camden Lock

PostRe: Creating Life
by Oh Teh Noes » Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:22 am

Space Viking wrote:
Fatal Exception wrote:If God created us in his own image then that surely means we can play god?


SOURCE?

The strawberry float are you on about? :?

Dr Cottle wrote:My favourite flavour of popsicle is DICK.
User avatar
Earfolds
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Evil Ted
Contact:

PostRe: Creating Life
by Earfolds » Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:27 am

If a man can create life, then the creation of life must be a natural process. It might be an anthropic process, but it's hardly going to become an unstoppable force of anti-nature ready to reap revenge on our terrible, deity-insulting deeds.

Also, Large Hadron Collider.

User avatar
Earfolds
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Evil Ted
Contact:

PostRe: Creating Life
by Earfolds » Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:48 am

Anung wrote:Collider....but i just met her!

Don't be silly; I wasn't talking to you. Your hadron is not large.

User avatar
Alvin Flummux
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Creating Life
by Alvin Flummux » Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:11 am

Artificial Life is only going to get progressively more advanced from here, and may end up at the stage where we will start attempting to re-create extinct species - first going for ones that went dead in the past few years, moving further and further back.

We may also wind up creating very large, very dangerous living war machines.

User avatar
Dowbocop
Member ♥
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Creating Life
by Dowbocop » Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:18 pm

It's not really creating life is it? Life needed to exist to create the cellular machinery the new genome was implanted into, so it's more of a nuclear refit in my opinion. It's still very interesting though...

User avatar
Drunken_Master
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Creating Life
by Drunken_Master » Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:43 pm

God creates dinosaurs. God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man. Man destroys God. Man creates dinosaurs...

Image

Prime Directives : Prosecute those who steal memes from other forums. :fp:
User avatar
Alvin Flummux
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Creating Life
by Alvin Flummux » Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:50 pm

Man destroys dinosaurs. Man creates mini-man.

Corazon de Leon

PostRe: Creating Life
by Corazon de Leon » Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:53 pm

Alvin Flummux wrote:Man destroys dinosaurs. Man creates mini-man.


It's a mini-adventure?


Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 544 guests