Page 344 of 410

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:53 am
by Lagamorph
Garth wrote:I guess she's had enough of experts.

It seems more like she's declaring herself as the expert and that the tech companies are the ones who don't know what they're talking about.

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:57 am
by DML
Its frustrating knowing how close she was to losing her seat as well.

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:58 am
by Lagamorph
If she hadn't demanded so many recunts she might have lost it :x

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 12:11 pm
by Meep
Amber Rudd wrote:I don't need to understand how encryption works

Just strawberry float off. Anyone can learn the basic principles in less than a day. If you can't be bothered then resign and let someone else do your job.

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 12:59 pm
by Garth
Theresa May insists she has 'full support' of cabinet after leadership challenge

Theresa May has responded to claims of a plot involving Tory MPs to oust her from Number 10, saying she is providing "calm leadership" with the "full support" of her cabinet.

Speaking in her Maidenhead constituency, the Prime Minister told reporters she had "had a cold all week".

But she insisted all ministers backed her to remain in the top job.

Mrs May's comments follow former party chairman Grant Shapps' claim that he and 30 other MPs - including "one or two cabinet ministers" - had agreed to call on her to resign.

http://news.sky.com/story/theresa-may-i ... e-11069352

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:09 pm
by Squinty
Lagamorph wrote:UK Home Secretary Calls Tech Leaders 'Patronizing' For Refusing To Believe Her 'Safe Backdoors' Spiels

strawberry float off Amber :fp:

She's literally saying that you can have an encryption backdoor without having a backdoor, because she doesn't even begin to understand how encryption works.
She insisted she does not want "back doors" installed in encryption codes, something the industry has warned will weaken security for all users, nor did she want to ban encryption, just to allow easier access by police and the security services.

What the strawberry float does she think that is if not a backdoor?


The BBC interview with her at the Tory conference was a funny. I forget the exact example she used for it, but she said she claimed she doesn't actually need to know about these things at all.

She also said it wasn't about encryption, but getting personal info from Whatsapp to aid in crime prevention.

She hasn't a hope in hell.

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:20 pm
by Irene Demova
The one thing standing between us and a dystopia is the fact that Tories understand less about technology than my nan

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:27 pm
by Cuttooth

twitter.com/faisalislam/status/916327100143030273



"There's a double blue tick I know you've read it!"

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:33 pm
by Lagamorph
Our governing political party are turning into a badly written High School drama.

I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 3:05 pm
by Lagamorph

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 3:43 pm
by Errkal
Saying it and doing it are very different luv, and so far you are more than happy to yabber and not follow through in gooseberry fool so strawberry float and do it or belt up.

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 4:25 pm
by Moggy
Errkal wrote:Saying it and doing it are very different luv, and so far you are more than happy to yabber and not follow through in gooseberry fool so strawberry float and do it or belt up.


Bit harsh, Laga ain’t that bad.

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 9:44 pm
by Lagamorph
Image

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:05 am
by Rex Kramer
After Hammond's piece in the Times today on not budgeting for no deal, who do we think will get the sack first - Hammond or Johnson?

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:17 pm
by Denster
Hammond.

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:20 pm
by Moggy
Denster wrote:Hammond.


Agreed, much less danger for her in sacking him than sacking Johnson.

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:35 pm
by Squinty
Hammond.

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:48 pm
by Denster
Moggy wrote:
Denster wrote:Hammond.


Agreed, much less danger for her in sacking him than sacking Johnson.

Pretty much. He’s made it easier for her with that article.

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:47 am
by Rex Kramer
Maybe he feels he's already out and so he's washing his hands of the whole mess before he gets pushed. I really fear for us if this is the case, someone who's all aboard the Brexit hype train in charge of the economy would be a disaster.

Re: The Politics Thread 3.0

Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 10:11 am
by Moggy

twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/918393800623558656



I DON’T CARE HOW OLD YOU ARE! LAY THE strawberry floating WREATH YOU OLD BITCH!