Evidence of Time Travellers?

Festive Exception wrote:

The time had been stopped at 10:06 am, and on the back had the word 'Swiss' engraved on i

O RLY? AM?

must be a cheap knock off if you can tell its am.

What annoys me about these sort of things are....

Why are there no more pictures?

Why aren't many other websites running the story?

You know full well there won't be any follow up story on it.

Have the Daily Express been hoaxed? If so, AWESOME.

FatDaz wrote:

Festive Exception wrote:

The time had been stopped at 10:06 am, and on the back had the word 'Swiss' engraved on i

O RLY? AM?

must be a cheap knock off if you can tell its am.

I wonder if it beeped on the hour, every hour?

It would've been more apt a prank if a Fossil watch was found buried there.

Cuban Mistletoe Crisis wrote:It would've been more apt a prank if a Fossil watch was found buried there.

Grave robbers just dont give up. One of them obviously found a way inside. There would proberably be multiple enterances to the tomb, for air supply (for the builders) and in case of cave ins.

I subscribe to the multiverse theory that allows backwards travel through time because you are transported to a parrallel universe where anything you do will have no consiquences in your origonal timeline. This means you can go back in time and kill yourself without destroying the universe (or Hitler, whatever floats your boat really).

Peter Crisp wrote:I subscribe to the multiverse theory that allows backwards travel through time because you are transported to a parrallel universe where anything you do will have no consiquences in your origonal timeline. This means you can go back in time and kill yourself without destroying the universe (or Hitler, whatever floats your boat really).

Surely, Pete, if I was to travel back in time, a trizillion years and "change" something, nothing would actually change as we're already living in the consequences of what I've done.

What I'm trying to say is, if, tomorrow, I was to travel back to today, I would see myself appear in front of me right now. Thus I know I'm not going to travel back to today, tomorrow.

So I subscribe to the theory that all the meddling has already been done, and you can't change anything, if you tried.

aaronayule1 wrote:

Peter Crisp wrote:I subscribe to the multiverse theory that allows backwards travel through time because you are transported to a parrallel universe where anything you do will have no consiquences in your origonal timeline. This means you can go back in time and kill yourself without destroying the universe (or Hitler, whatever floats your boat really).

Surely, Pete, if I was to travel back in time, a trizillion years and "change" something, nothing would actually change as we're already living in the consequences of what I've done.

What I'm trying to say is, if, tomorrow, I was to travel back to today, I would see myself appear in front of me right now. Thus I know I'm not going to travel back to today, tomorrow.

So I subscribe to the theory that all the meddling has already been done, and you can't change anything, if you tried.

Pre determination? Yeah I agree. If time travel was possible, somone would have done it already and shared the technology with us by now!

Carlos wrote:

bigcheez2k3 wrote:

Sam_Seed wrote:I was watching Back to the Future III the other day, y'know, the one set in the Wild West. Marty and the Doc were stuck there because they couldn't get the Delorean upto 88 miles per hour or something.

When it struck me, why not just set the mph for time travel to be triggered to be lower? Instead of pissing about trying to get the car to 88mph in ye olde times!

For a genius, that Doc Brown is awfully stupid.

You do realise you need to travel faster than the speed of light to time travel anyway so 88Mph is pretty low.

If my A-level physics serves me correctly it is impossible (as we know it) to travel faster than light, as once an object with mass reaches the speed of light it becomes infinitely heavy, and therefore starts to deccellerate?

In Star Trek they get round this by 'surfing' on reality (warp) and in their universe, the ship actually doesny move, merely the space around the ship.

You're forgetting about the flux capacitor which negates those particular laws of physics once 88mph is reached.

FatDaz wrote:

aaronayule1 wrote:

Peter Crisp wrote:I subscribe to the multiverse theory that allows backwards travel through time because you are transported to a parrallel universe where anything you do will have no consiquences in your origonal timeline. This means you can go back in time and kill yourself without destroying the universe (or Hitler, whatever floats your boat really).

Surely, Pete, if I was to travel back in time, a trizillion years and "change" something, nothing would actually change as we're already living in the consequences of what I've done.

What I'm trying to say is, if, tomorrow, I was to travel back to today, I would see myself appear in front of me right now. Thus I know I'm not going to travel back to today, tomorrow.

So I subscribe to the theory that all the meddling has already been done, and you can't change anything, if you tried.

Pre determination? Yeah I agree. If time travel was possible, somone would have done it already and shared the technology with us by now!

Surely it's only possible to go as far back in time as the initial creation of the machine?

Poncho Ho Ho wrote:

FatDaz wrote:

aaronayule1 wrote:

Peter Crisp wrote:I subscribe to the multiverse theory that allows backwards travel through time because you are transported to a parrallel universe where anything you do will have no consiquences in your origonal timeline. This means you can go back in time and kill yourself without destroying the universe (or Hitler, whatever floats your boat really).

Surely, Pete, if I was to travel back in time, a trizillion years and "change" something, nothing would actually change as we're already living in the consequences of what I've done.

What I'm trying to say is, if, tomorrow, I was to travel back to today, I would see myself appear in front of me right now. Thus I know I'm not going to travel back to today, tomorrow.

So I subscribe to the theory that all the meddling has already been done, and you can't change anything, if you tried.

Pre determination? Yeah I agree. If time travel was possible, somone would have done it already and shared the technology with us by now!

Surely it's only possible to go as far back in time as the initial creation of the machine?

Some physicists (sp?) have said that would be the case

T9Flake wrote:

Poncho Ho Ho wrote:

FatDaz wrote:

aaronayule1 wrote:

Peter Crisp wrote:I subscribe to the multiverse theory that allows backwards travel through time because you are transported to a parrallel universe where anything you do will have no consiquences in your origonal timeline. This means you can go back in time and kill yourself without destroying the universe (or Hitler, whatever floats your boat really).

Surely, Pete, if I was to travel back in time, a trizillion years and "change" something, nothing would actually change as we're already living in the consequences of what I've done.

What I'm trying to say is, if, tomorrow, I was to travel back to today, I would see myself appear in front of me right now. Thus I know I'm not going to travel back to today, tomorrow.

So I subscribe to the theory that all the meddling has already been done, and you can't change anything, if you tried.

Pre determination? Yeah I agree. If time travel was possible, somone would have done it already and shared the technology with us by now!

Surely it's only possible to go as far back in time as the initial creation of the machine?

Some physicists (sp?) have said that would be the case

Bollocks. If you've got a time machine, it wouldn't cease to exist once you went back to a certain point. All it would do is spoil the time before time-travel existed. The time afterwards is beyond repair.

I know this because the last time I tried it the Time-Space Continuity Police Federation informed me of my violation once I went past 2044 and sent me back from whence I came, to 2048.

Surely if the machine can go back in time, then it must exist outside the normal timeline, meaning it can go back before the time it was created?