Evidence of Time Travellers?

a bad christmas day wrote:Wouldn't it be crazy if they managed to read the serial number and realised that it hadn't even been made yet?

If it hasn't been made yet then that is a true mind strawberry float.

a bad christmas day wrote:Wouldn't it be crazy if they managed to read the serial number and realised that it hadn't even been made yet?

Wouldn't it be great if paleontologists found out that all the dinosaurs wore Rolexes?

bigcheez2k3 wrote:
Sam_Seed wrote:I was watching Back to the Future III the other day, y'know, the one set in the Wild West. Marty and the Doc were stuck there because they couldn't get the Delorean upto 88 miles per hour or something.

When it struck me, why not just set the mph for time travel to be triggered to be lower? Instead of pissing about trying to get the car to 88mph in ye olde times!

For a genius, that Doc Brown is awfully stupid.

You do realise you need to travel faster than the speed of light to time travel anyway so 88Mph is pretty low.

No, I didn't realise that. Thank you for that information. I feel my life is enriched as a result of knowing this.

Elfhours wrote:
a bad christmas day wrote:Wouldn't it be crazy if they managed to read the serial number and realised that it hadn't even been made yet?

Wouldn't it be great if paleontologists found out that all the dinosaurs wore Rolexes?

How would a T-Rex be able to read it?

Commander Jameson wrote:
Elfhours wrote:
a bad christmas day wrote:Wouldn't it be crazy if they managed to read the serial number and realised that it hadn't even been made yet?

Wouldn't it be great if paleontologists found out that all the dinosaurs wore Rolexes?

How would a T-Rex be able to read it?

It's academic.

They wouldn't be able to afford them anyway!

PostRe: Evidence of Time Travellers? by **FatDaz** » Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:25 am

Commander Jameson wrote:
Elfhours wrote:
a bad christmas day wrote:Wouldn't it be crazy if they managed to read the serial number and realised that it hadn't even been made yet?

Wouldn't it be great if paleontologists found out that all the dinosaurs wore Rolexes?

How would a T-Rex be able to read it?

More to the point with their short arms how would they put them on?

FatDaz wrote:
Commander Jameson wrote:
Elfhours wrote:
a bad christmas day wrote:Wouldn't it be crazy if they managed to read the serial number and realised that it hadn't even been made yet?

Wouldn't it be great if paleontologists found out that all the dinosaurs wore Rolexes?

How would a T-Rex be able to read it?

More to the point with their short arms how would they put them on?

Well, that Swiss watch in the tomb looks tiny enough!

PostRe: Evidence of Time Travellers? by **Carlos** » Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:26 am

bigcheez2k3 wrote:
Sam_Seed wrote:I was watching Back to the Future III the other day, y'know, the one set in the Wild West. Marty and the Doc were stuck there because they couldn't get the Delorean upto 88 miles per hour or something.

When it struck me, why not just set the mph for time travel to be triggered to be lower? Instead of pissing about trying to get the car to 88mph in ye olde times!

For a genius, that Doc Brown is awfully stupid.

You do realise you need to travel faster than the speed of light to time travel anyway so 88Mph is pretty low.

If my A-level physics serves me correctly it is impossible (as we know it) to travel faster than light, as once an object with mass reaches the speed of light it becomes infinitely heavy, and therefore starts to deccellerate?

In Star Trek they get round this by 'surfing' on reality (warp) and in their universe, the ship actually doesny move, merely the space around the ship.

How do we know that isn't just a HUGE hand holding the watch, eh?

Carlos wrote:If my A-level physics serves me correctly it is impossible (as we know it) to travel faster than light, as once an object with mass reaches the speed of light it becomes infinitely heavy, and therefore starts to deccellerate?

In Star Trek they get round this by 'surfing' on reality (warp) and in their universe, the ship actually doesny move, merely the space around the ship.

A-level physics eh? Impressive.

Did you do 'A-level' English too?

PostRe: Evidence of Time Travellers? by **abcd** » Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:35 am

It's like a piece of paper.

To travel from one side to the other, it would always be the same distance....

Unless you fold the paper in half.

PostRe: Evidence of Time Travellers? by **Octoroc** » Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:39 am

There once was a lady named Bright,
Who could travel much faster than light,
She went out one day,
In a relative way,
And returned home the previous night!

See kids? Science is fun!

PostRe: Evidence of Time Travellers? by **HrC** » Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:40 am

Exploding science is better though. That, or setting magnesium alight when you should be doing other practical experiments.

Sam_Seed wrote:
bigcheez2k3 wrote:
Sam_Seed wrote:I was watching Back to the Future III the other day, y'know, the one set in the Wild West. Marty and the Doc were stuck there because they couldn't get the Delorean upto 88 miles per hour or something.

When it struck me, why not just set the mph for time travel to be triggered to be lower? Instead of pissing about trying to get the car to 88mph in ye olde times!

For a genius, that Doc Brown is awfully stupid.

You do realise you need to travel faster than the speed of light to time travel anyway so 88Mph is pretty low.

No, I didn't realise that. Thank you for that information. I feel my life is enriched as a result of knowing this.

No problem.

banana split.

PostRe: Evidence of Time Travellers? by **FatDaz** » Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:05 pm

a bad christmas day wrote:It's like a piece of paper.

To travel from one side to the other, it would always be the same distance....

Unless you fold the paper in half.

I was so going to reference Event Horizon but you beat me to it! 8-)

fake.

PostRe: Evidence of Time Travellers? by **abcd** » Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:18 pm

gaminglegend wrote:fake.

Can we get a source on this?

The time had been stopped at 10:06 am, and on the back had the word 'Swiss' engraved on i

O RLY? AM?

Also, they seem to have overlooked the fact that the knobs to adjust analogue watches are on the right of the watch, which means they are holding it upside down in that picture, which leaves it at about 5:35.

PostRe: Evidence of Time Travellers? by **FatDaz** » Thu Dec 18, 2008 4:20 pm

Festive Exception wrote:
The time had been stopped at 10:06 am, and on the back had the word 'Swiss' engraved on i

O RLY? AM?

must be a cheap knock off if you can tell its am.

PostRe: Evidence of Time Travellers? by **abcd** » Thu Dec 18, 2008 4:40 pm

What annoys me about these sort of things are....

Why are there no more pictures?

Why aren't many other websites running the story?

You know full well there won't be any follow up story on it.

Have the Daily Express been hoaxed? If so, AWESOME.

Evidence of Time Travellers?

Who is online

Affiliates