GRcade

Moggy wrote:

Return_of_the_STAR wrote:The best place to survive a large scale nuclear war is clearly the Southern Hemisphere. South America or South Africa. Australia is probably out of the question as they would probably end up as a target at some point.

Australia has the advantage that the only really big settlements are on the coast – the middle is pretty much empty.

Australia has the disadvantage that there is a reason that the middle is pretty much empty.

lex-man wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Return_of_the_STAR wrote:The best place to survive a large scale nuclear war is clearly the Southern Hemisphere. South America or South Africa. Australia is probably out of the question as they would probably end up as a target at some point.

Australia has the advantage that the only really big settlements are on the coast – the middle is pretty much empty.

Australia has the disadvantage that there is a reason that the middle is pretty much empty.

It might be a bit hard to find food after a nuclear strike though. What about New Zealand?

lex-man wrote:

Corazon de Leon wrote:

Gently-Parted Ringpiece wrote:https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

Enjoy.

To be fair, according to this I'd be fine if they went for Faslane - would be in fireball range only for Tsar Bomba. If they went for Glasgow even the smallest bomb would incinerate me though.

What if they use one of these?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 78876.html

lex-man wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Return_of_the_STAR wrote:The best place to survive a large scale nuclear war is clearly the Southern Hemisphere. South America or South Africa. Australia is probably out of the question as they would probably end up as a target at some point.

Australia has the advantage that the only really big settlements are on the coast – the middle is pretty much empty.

Australia has the disadvantage that there is a reason that the middle is pretty much empty.

It might be a bit hard to find food after a nuclear strike though. What about New Zealand?

Karl wrote:

lex-man wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Return_of_the_STAR wrote:The best place to survive a large scale nuclear war is clearly the Southern Hemisphere. South America or South Africa. Australia is probably out of the question as they would probably end up as a target at some point.

Australia has the advantage that the only really big settlements are on the coast – the middle is pretty much empty.

Australia has the disadvantage that there is a reason that the middle is pretty much empty.

It might be a bit hard to find food after a nuclear strike though. What about New Zealand?

New Zealand is Five Eyes so all the comms stuff there would get hit.

BID0 wrote:Australia is already dangerous enough without radioactive aussies or mutated spiders and lizards

Ad7 wrote:Hahaha oh strawberry floating hell prezzy

When my Mrs was a kid her dad told her world war 3 had started as she was leaving for school... she was hysterical in class that her nan was dead and had to be driven home

Alvin Flummux wrote:I don't live anywhere near any legit targets - my nearest military establishment is the Wright-Patterson Airbase, which also houses a kick-ass Air Force museum where the Enola Gay and other famous craft are stored.

I'd more than likely survive the initial bombings, only to die from contaminated water or some gooseberry fool. I fully expect everybody to be packing heat and going on murder/loot sprees as soon as those sirens go off - bad news for poor old unarmed me.

Ad7 wrote:Hahaha oh strawberry floating hell prezzy

When my Mrs was a kid her dad told her world war 3 had started as she was leaving for school... she was hysterical in class that her nan was dead and had to be driven home

Preezy wrote:I pranked my wife with one of those YouTube clips that cuts to the emergency broadcast screen and warns of an imminent nuclear attack....

It backfired, she freaked out and cried.

i think I'm in the doghouse