Albear, just to make 100% sure, you had these tests done by (or at the behest of) an actual doctor, right?
Because
your common or garden food 'intolerance' test is 100% pseudoscientific bullshit and I'd hate to think you wasted money getting one, much less ruined your culinary variety over its 'results'.
EDIT: To prevent you having to read a long article, here is the take-away (ha):
At present, there are no reliable and validated clinical tests for the diagnosis of food intolerance. While intolerances are non-immune by definition, IgG testing is actively promoted for diagnosis, and to guide management. These tests lack both a sound scientific rationale and evidence of effectiveness. The lack of correlation between results and actual symptoms, and the risks resulting from unnecessary food avoidance, escalate the potential for harm from this test. Further, there is no published clinical evidence to support the use of IgG tests to determine the need for vitamins or supplements. In light of the lack of clinical relevance, and the potential for harm resulting from their use, allergy and immunology organizations worldwide advise against the use of IgG testing for food intolerance.
Your diet may well be poor, and that may well be contributing to why you are feeling tired or bloated.
But unless you were tested by a real doctor, after being referred by your actual GP, the data you've been given probably doesn't show you are really 'intolerant' to anything. Improve your nutrition in general and there's no reason you can't continue to eat the foods you like (albeit perhaps in more healthy proportions?).
EDIT 2: ... Err, apologies if you got a real test and I'm being pedantic for no reason, of course!