DML wrote:Moggy wrote:Photek wrote:Moggy wrote:Yes Photek, that's exactly what I meant.
Kane has played 17 times for England (can't be arsed to check how many he started) and scored 5 goals. In probably the most underperforming and woeful England sides in history, I don't think that is a terrible stat for a young striker.
Amazing
You
of all people getting triggered cos I made a joke.
I understand your point but its not like Messi who hasnt won a world cup, Kane has been absolutely bobbins for England. I think he's a great striker but have slight reservations about some things in his game.
Triggered? I don't think that word means what you think it means.
Everyone has been bobbins for England, it's a bobbins team full of players playing bobbins led by bobbins managers.Kane's a good player but plays in a shite international team. It's not the same as when Steven Gerrard played bobbins for England while surrounded by better players.
That is a typical football fan view and its far too easy a get out clause.
The reality is England are a top 15 side and should be doing far better. That counts for all the players.
Kane had no goals and no assists at Euro 2016.
That's pretty much exactly what I said.
England are bobbins.
The players are playing bobbins.
The managers have been bobbins.
Of course England should be doing better, but they haven't been because of bobbins.
Kane is a good player, he doesn't suddenly become shite just because it is international football, he becomes shite because he is in a shite side. Not shite on paper, there are excellent players in that side, but because England just doesn't seem to work.