From Freedom to Fascism

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
SEP
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: From Freedom to Fascism
by SEP » Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:28 pm

LewisD in a Pear Tree wrote:This thread is tl;dr... could someone sum it up in no more than 15 words and a picture drawn in MSPaint if needed.

kthx.


People are bad, America is bad, people owe money, we're all strawberry floated.

Image
User avatar
That
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Joined in 2008

PostRe: From Freedom to Fascism
by That » Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:37 pm

LewisD in a Pear Tree wrote:This thread is tl;dr... could someone sum it up in no more than 15 words and a picture drawn in MSPaint if needed.


bankers and tax-collectors have a super-government that rules the world

Image

Image
User avatar
SEP
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: From Freedom to Fascism
by SEP » Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:24 pm

Lucien wrote:
Merry Christmas, Noobs! wrote:
LewisD in a Pear Tree wrote:This thread is tl;dr... could someone sum it up in no more than 15 words and a picture drawn in MSPaint if needed.

kthx.


People are bad, America is bad, people owe money, we're all ******.


Most people are good, America is mainly good, but strangely they do owe money. The best film to describe this is Zeitgeist. Ignore the whole tax issue, because it's only a smaller part of a larger entity.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=_dmPchuXIXQ

;)


OK, how about:

People aren't bad, America isn't bad, America owes money, we're all strawberry floated?

Image
User avatar
TheTurnipKing
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: From Freedom to Fascism
by TheTurnipKing » Mon Dec 22, 2008 4:29 am

$ilva $anta wrote:So fraud has occurred. A small organisation has reaped billions of profits since 1913.


I'll tell you what, when the congestion charge is gone, you should keep paying it. It's only fair. And you shouldn't question it either even if they lock you up in a cell for not paying.

It's not as simple as just ratifying the bill again. No state will touch it or even think about ratifying it.

What's the use in the law if it's not set in stone? America was founded on the principles of freedom. A free state that didn't require tax on labour, taxes elsewhere made up for it, but a tax on labour was not supposed to be, they've found it to be unconstitutional, yet men and women who don't pay it are locked up by the IRS.










Edit: In response to Extralife. If there's no law for it, why should it be so? It's illegal. That's the end of it. Try passing it again. There was no labour tax before 1913. They couldtry passing it again, but the government has defrauded its people. You can spin it any way you want. The correct procedures were not followed in a free state and it was not brought to the attention of the 'free people'. Whatever else you say may be true about paying higher taxes elsewhere but that's not what it's about. A government that can do that to its people is not right.

Well then, it seems to me that there are two points of failure. The current administration has inherited a system that is broken, and it is up to them to fix it. But then you also have to ask why it has taken so many years of the public to notice this is wrong - assuming that it's not verified someplace else in the byzantine documentation systems of law. So the current administration should seek to close this gap by re-passing the law, or finding alternatives if it is not passed. If that means raising other taxes to compensate, so be it. That is the will of the people, and short-sighted or otherwise, that is what the government are there to represent.

As to the money... returning it is clearly not an option, and assuming it was used in the common good of the American people, it seems to me that it should just be written off by the public. Those arrested though, should clearly be set free. These people have been irreparably wronged by their country and as such should be compensated.

User avatar
Cal
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: From Freedom to Fascism
by Cal » Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:35 am

TheTurnipKing wrote:As to the money... returning it is clearly not an option, and assuming it was used in the common good of the American people, it seems to me that it should just be written off by the public. Those arrested though, should clearly be set free. These people have been irreparably wronged by their country and as such should be compensated.


Agreed. These are fascinating films, btw; I've not been aware of the present situation regarding the laws (or complete absence thereof) regarding US income tax until now. Utterly fascinating and very worrying. Bottom line is: if there is no law, there is no legally enforceable requirement to pay.

User avatar
$ilva $hadow
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: From Freedom to Fascism
by $ilva $hadow » Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:03 am

The scandal may not actually exist. Nothing is black and white in politics and governments especially when money is involved. But when money is involved, it's safe to say there's something dodgy going on.

But anyway, I'm wary of both sources to after checking up on what lex-man has pointed out about the selective quoting. While watching the vids on youtube, almost all of the quotes seem dodgy. If any president ever said anything along those lines it would be publicised up to heaven and down to hell. Everyone would know. The guy who made that 'documentary', clearly has an agenda. What I don't get however is who those lawyers and ex-IRS folks really are claiming they can't find the law and saying they haven't paid tax in years.

Edit signature
Your signature will appear like this in posts
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Worcestershire

PostRe: From Freedom to Fascism
by Slartibartfast » Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:28 am

TheTurnipKing wrote:
$ilva $anta wrote:So fraud has occurred. A small organisation has reaped billions of profits since 1913.


I'll tell you what, when the congestion charge is gone, you should keep paying it. It's only fair. And you shouldn't question it either even if they lock you up in a cell for not paying.

It's not as simple as just ratifying the bill again. No state will touch it or even think about ratifying it.

What's the use in the law if it's not set in stone? America was founded on the principles of freedom. A free state that didn't require tax on labour, taxes elsewhere made up for it, but a tax on labour was not supposed to be, they've found it to be unconstitutional, yet men and women who don't pay it are locked up by the IRS.










Edit: In response to Extralife. If there's no law for it, why should it be so? It's illegal. That's the end of it. Try passing it again. There was no labour tax before 1913. They couldtry passing it again, but the government has defrauded its people. You can spin it any way you want. The correct procedures were not followed in a free state and it was not brought to the attention of the 'free people'. Whatever else you say may be true about paying higher taxes elsewhere but that's not what it's about. A government that can do that to its people is not right.

Well then, it seems to me that there are two points of failure. The current administration has inherited a system that is broken, and it is up to them to fix it. But then you also have to ask why it has taken so many years of the public to notice this is wrong - assuming that it's not verified someplace else in the byzantine documentation systems of law. So the current administration should seek to close this gap by re-passing the law, or finding alternatives if it is not passed. If that means raising other taxes to compensate, so be it. That is the will of the people, and short-sighted or otherwise, that is what the government are there to represent.

As to the money... returning it is clearly not an option, and assuming it was used in the common good of the American people, it seems to me that it should just be written off by the public. Those arrested though, should clearly be set free. These people have been irreparably wronged by their country and as such should be compensated.


Having looked at this issue in the past, the solution proposed by those many years ago (when they thought it might actually be a problem) was to just back-date the law. While that usually isn't allowed in the USA the chances are an amendment could be found, or some type of work around.
But then it was discovered that was unnecessary and it was left for the selective quoting nut jobs to have their fun on YouTube.

User avatar
$ilva $hadow
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: From Freedom to Fascism
by $ilva $hadow » Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:34 am

Backdating the law wouldn't be an issue. Even our government does it. But over here, Parliament is not allowed to be questioned as they have the power to do that.

Edit signature
Your signature will appear like this in posts
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Worcestershire

PostRe: From Freedom to Fascism
by Slartibartfast » Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:37 am

$ilva $anta wrote:Backdating the law wouldn't be an issue. Even our government does it. But over here, Parliament is not allowed to be questioned as they have the power to do that.


I think that the US constitution forbids back dating tax laws, but that's a really hazy memory.

Like I say though, it wouldn't be hard to get a work around if it really had to.


Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Garth, Google [Bot] and 584 guests