massimo wrote:The point I think we're missing here though is that the internet will have to eventually be regulated in one way or another one day.
It is regulated - and very stringently, as it happens. The IWF are just one of hundreds of self-appointed online censors, even before you start counting the multitude of multinational government-appointed online policing organisations.
massimo wrote:...and one day someone will find out a way of really using it to devastating affect.
...And that'll be governments who long ago realised that simply by invoking the spectral fear of online child abuse ("a £20billion a year industry" according to several government sources both here and abroad) they can create a diversionary access route to sneaking in all the restrictive legislation they want - with nobody able to argue against it. It's not about preventing child abuse: it never was and it never will be - that's a side issue, a total, calculated distraction. Until you understand that, your freedoms will continue to fade slowly and quietly away until all you are left with is a slow, government-filtered 'clean feed' via your broadband. Which is, funnily, enough, what the Australians are about to get themselves.
But you carry right on blithely supporting these measures to 'clean up' the interweb. You must be right.