Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Hexx » Tue Aug 08, 2017 1:48 pm

http://imgur.com/eZtcvFm

That one guy who's not on fire but acting like it :wub:
User avatar
Ironhide
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Autobot City

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Ironhide » Tue Aug 08, 2017 2:05 pm

Judging by how some of Drogons victims instantly turned into ash I's say dragon fire is pretty effing hot, I suppose anyone near enough to a sudden blast of heat like that would still get burnt even if they didn't burst into flames so it's not that unrealistic a reaction.
Image
User avatar
Peter Crisp
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Peter Crisp » Tue Aug 08, 2017 2:17 pm

On the plus side after the war dragons are going to be an essential extra at barbecues.
Daenerys can pretty much corner the market and make a bloody fortune as people will love having a dragon at a party.
jiggles wrote:Nobody with a VR headset is going to be using it regularly this time next year, let alone in 4 years time.


Posted 16th March 2016. Let's see.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Moggy » Tue Aug 08, 2017 2:26 pm

Ironhide wrote:Judging by how some of Drogons victims instantly turned into ash

Peter Crisp wrote:On the plus side after the war dragons are going to be an essential extra at barbecues.


Never ever go to a barbecue at Peter's house. :dread:
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Hexx » Tue Aug 08, 2017 3:40 pm

Ironhide wrote:Judging by how some of Drogons victims instantly turned into ash I's say dragon fire is pretty effing hot, I suppose anyone near enough to a sudden blast of heat like that would still get burnt even if they didn't burst into flames so it's not that unrealistic a reaction.


Good fan-wankery :)

I just thought it was committed to his craft. They editted him out of the episode (4.30) :(

User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Denster » Tue Aug 08, 2017 4:50 pm

Jamie's motivation for charging Drogon/Dany?

Ive heard a few comments on FB and on Thronecast that it was a suicidal charge where he knew he'd die but it would be a heroic death and an escape from the trapped life he's found himself in.

Personally I think he's traumatised and outraged at the use of the dragon and the death of his men. He wants to kill her for unleashing it. At that moment he is just acting on instinct and that instinct is revenge and retribution.
Love list


Super Dragon 64
User avatar
FatDaz
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by FatDaz » Tue Aug 08, 2017 4:57 pm

Ironhide wrote:Judging by how some of Drogons victims instantly turned into ash I's say dragon fire is pretty effing hot, I suppose anyone near enough to a sudden blast of heat like that would still get burnt even if they didn't burst into flames so it's not that unrealistic a reaction.


Unless you are Bronn or Jamie and then you are fine
User avatar
Curls
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Curls » Tue Aug 08, 2017 5:05 pm

I enjoyed that epi. Although Bran can jut go fall out of another window, he's so strawberry floating boring. His storyline has been gooseberry fool since the first episode.
User avatar
Ironhide
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Autobot City

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Ironhide » Tue Aug 08, 2017 5:23 pm

Denster wrote:Jamie's motivation for charging Drogon/Dany?

Ive heard a few comments on FB and on Thronecast that it was a suicidal charge where he knew he'd die but it would be a heroic death and an escape from the trapped life he's found himself in.

Personally I think he's traumatised and outraged at the use of the dragon and the death of his men. He wants to kill her for unleashing it. At that moment he is just acting on instinct and that instinct is revenge and retribution.


He saw Dany's father burn people alive and eventually killed him for it so after seeing her do the same he thinks she's yet another crazy Targaryan despot who needs to die.

Its the same reason I think he'll kill Cersei, she's already responsible for the deaths of several thousand people and is rapidly getting into Mad King levels of tyranny.
Image
User avatar
Ad7
Member
Joined in 2009

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Ad7 » Tue Aug 08, 2017 6:52 pm

Denster wrote:Jamie's motivation for charging Drogon/Dany?

Ive heard a few comments on FB and on Thronecast that it was a suicidal charge where he knew he'd die but it would be a heroic death and an escape from the trapped life he's found himself in.

Personally I think he's traumatised and outraged at the use of the dragon and the death of his men. He wants to kill her for unleashing it. At that moment he is just acting on instinct and that instinct is revenge and retribution.


:lol:

More like he hadn't seen her before, there she was, I can kill her right now and end this.
User avatar
Lucien
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Lucien » Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:27 pm

He was screwed anyway. Why not?
User avatar
Rocsteady
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Rocsteady » Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:35 pm

Ad7 wrote:
Denster wrote:Jamie's motivation for charging Drogon/Dany?

Ive heard a few comments on FB and on Thronecast that it was a suicidal charge where he knew he'd die but it would be a heroic death and an escape from the trapped life he's found himself in.

Personally I think he's traumatised and outraged at the use of the dragon and the death of his men. He wants to kill her for unleashing it. At that moment he is just acting on instinct and that instinct is revenge and retribution.


:lol:

More like he hadn't seen her before, there she was, I can kill her right now and end this.

Yeah. The simplest explanation makes the most sense.
Image
User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Denster » Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:36 pm

Each to their own.
Love list


Super Dragon 64
User avatar
Ad7
Member
Joined in 2009

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Ad7 » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:17 pm

To each their own :shifty:
User avatar
Dual
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Irene Demova

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Dual » Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:34 pm

Jamie seems to be quite pragmatic so Ad7s explanation seems the most likely
User avatar
Grumpy David
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Cubeamania

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Grumpy David » Wed Aug 09, 2017 12:20 am

Saw a reddit theory post on about Jaime Lannister being the "Prince that was promised". Sounds plausible and quite satisfying as the story goes but it's just fan speculation at this stage.

Meanwhile someone I know in real life has read the scripts that have leaked so they're on mute for the next 2.5 weeks.
User avatar
Saint of Killers
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Saint of Killers » Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:58 am

Watched ep 4 again. So the gold made it to King's Landing before the attack? Noooo.
| (•_•)| S: This is the best date I've been on since my last date. PB: This is not a date.
S: Neither was the last one. It was a robbery. M: Really? S: Yeah. She stole my heart. And my crown. (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
User avatar
Return_of_the_STAR
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Northampton

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Return_of_the_STAR » Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:04 am

Saint of Killers wrote:Watched ep 4 again. So the gold made it to King's Landing before the attack? Noooo.


I'm not sure what you are saying, are you disagreeing that all the gold made it to kings landing?
Image

GRAPL Heavyweight Champion 2010, Runner Up 2017, tag team Champion 2011, 2015, Wrestlemania PPV Winner 2012 and your current all time highest GRAPL points scorer.
Fixture feeling champion 2013.

I'm a Paul Heyman guy!
User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Squinty » Wed Aug 09, 2017 10:08 am

Grumpy David wrote:Saw a reddit theory post on about Jaime Lannister being the "Prince that was promised". Sounds plausible and quite satisfying as the story goes but it's just fan speculation at this stage.

Meanwhile someone I know in real life has read the scripts that have leaked so they're on mute for the next 2.5 weeks.


I hope he is. He's one of my favourites due to the whole character 180 he does.

Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: <]:^D, bear, Denster, Errkal, Kanbei, KjGarly, Lagamorph, mcjihge2, Met, Miguel007, Poser, PurplePenguin, Skippy, Snowcannon, Squinty, teh bork, That's not a growth and 39 guests