Page 335 of 388
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:09 am
by Moggy
Who is Euron going to kill for Cersei? I assume his gift is going to be a decapitated head, not a necklace.
My immediate thought was Tyrion, but I can't see Euron getting anywhere near him. One, or more, of the Dornish sand snakes? Or maybe Dorne itself, rather than the gift being an actual dead person?
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:15 am
by Denster
As a book reading wanker - I'm pretty sure I'm know what Euron's gift will be.
The Ed Sheeran was a not very subtly done but he's a bout the fourth or fifth pop star to cameo. It's really not that big a deal.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:31 am
by Moggy
Denster wrote:As a book reading wanker - I'm pretty sure I'm know what Euron's gift will be.
I'm a book reading wanker as well, but I have no idea.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:45 am
by Denster
Moggy wrote:Denster wrote:As a book reading wanker - I'm pretty sure I'm know what Euron's gift will be.
I'm a book reading wanker as well, but I have no idea.
You're just a wanker.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:48 am
by Victor Mildew
It's Sansa.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:48 am
by Moggy
Denster wrote:Moggy wrote:Denster wrote:As a book reading wanker - I'm pretty sure I'm know what Euron's gift will be.
I'm a book reading wanker as well, but I have no idea.
You're just a wanker.
At least once a day, twice on my birthday and Christmas.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 11:03 am
by Return_of_the_STAR
I hadn't read this before.
Now to those extended episodes! HBO over in the US has posted unique pages for each instalment of the new season, revealing that the finale on August 27 will be a whopping 81 minutes long!
In between the premiere and the finale, episode two on July 23 is also 59 minutes, episode three on July 30 stretches to 63 minutes,episode four comes in a bit shorter at 50 minutes, episode five bounces back up to 59 minutes, and then the sixth episode hits 71 minutes!
Episode four will seem really short in relation to the others.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 11:10 am
by Victor Mildew
Gotta get those extra ad breaks in.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 11:32 am
by Moggy
Ad7 wrote:Gotta get those extra ad breaks in.
It's an HBO show, there are no ad breaks.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 12:32 pm
by Squinty
Moggy wrote:Who is Euron going to kill for Cersei? I assume his gift is going to be a decapitated head, not a necklace.
My immediate thought was Tyrion, but I can't see Euron getting anywhere near him. One, or more, of the Dornish sand snakes? Or maybe Dorne itself, rather than the gift being an actual dead person?
Dorne is pretty gooseberry fool. So hopefully that.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 1:49 pm
by Denster
The description for the third episode is Cersei returns a gift so whatever it is - she doesn't want/need/can't use it.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 1:55 pm
by Moggy
Denster wrote:The description for the third episode is
.
Assuming it's the same gift. Maybe in episode 3, Jaime gives her a portrait of Tyrion and she returns it in a rage?
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 1:57 pm
by Victor Mildew
Denster wrote:The description for the third episode is Cersei returns a gift so whatever it is - she doesn't want/need/can't use it.
I need to stay out of got threads.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:04 pm
by Albert
I've added spoilers. Please be careful peeps.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:27 pm
by Denster
That's not a spoiler. Don't come in the thread. It's simple.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:33 pm
by Moggy
I can't see it was a biggie but I guess info on future episodes counts as a spoiler. I'll avoid quoting Sir Denster of Spoilerville in future.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:52 pm
by Ironhide
Garth wrote:I hope we don't see people like Ed Sheeran popping up everywhere, his blatant cameo took me out of that scene.
It was completely unnecessary.
I didn't notice him, thought it was just some random ginger twat.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 7:12 pm
by Denster
I posted on FB yesterday morning (having already seen the first EP) that after six season of set up - they killed a dragon in the first episode.
It made me wildly unpopular.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 7:13 pm
by Denster
Moggy wrote:I can't see it was a biggie but I guess info on future episodes counts as a spoiler. I'll avoid quoting Sir Denster of Spoilerville in future.
It's the brief description of the episode. Barely more than the title.
Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 7:27 pm
by Moggy
Denster wrote:Moggy wrote:I can't see it was a biggie but I guess info on future episodes counts as a spoiler. I'll avoid quoting Sir Denster of Spoilerville in future.
It's the brief description of the episode. Barely more than the title.
Yeah but the title is "Red Wedding 2: They all die this time!" and that's a little spoilery.