Re: Games TM scores
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:03 pm
Good issue apart from the revelation that madworld is not all it's being cracked up to be, prepare for massive disappointment
Rik wrote:Good issue apart from the revelation that madworld is not all it's being cracked up to be, prepare for massive disappointment
two solid and sexy hours of fun before the novelty wears off......What looks like a core game, sounds like a core game and is marketed like a core game, but isn't a core game? As much as it pains us to say it the punchline might just be Madworld....made with Wii's audience in mind
MadWorlds's background has whetted the appetite of Wii's attention-starved core gamers, but every time we see the game it becomes apparent that this is not the answer to their prayers
This is me breathing wrote:If you believe GamesTM, you'll believe anyone.
I mean you could just ignore all the other good previews its had...but that would be silly surely.
suzzopher wrote::(
Rik wrote:This is me breathing wrote:If you believe GamesTM, you'll believe anyone.
I mean you could just ignore all the other good previews its had...but that would be silly surely.
I tend to believe them,why would they say it if it wasn't true?
This is me breathing wrote:Rik wrote:This is me breathing wrote:If you believe GamesTM, you'll believe anyone.
I mean you could just ignore all the other good previews its had...but that would be silly surely.
I tend to believe them,why would they say it if it wasn't true?
Because its GamesTM and they like to be controversial. Boiling Point, 9 anyone.
KKLEIN wrote:Eighthours wrote:Retro gubbins: behind the scenes on Discworld
I miss the Discworld games. 2 was excellent ("That's....death!"), & Noir would have been superb if it didn't LOSE THE strawberry floating PLOT about halfway through, plus it had some strange glitches so you couldn't complete it. Still a good game nonetheless.
Rik wrote:This is me breathing wrote:Rik wrote:This is me breathing wrote:If you believe GamesTM, you'll believe anyone.
I mean you could just ignore all the other good previews its had...but that would be silly surely.
I tend to believe them,why would they say it if it wasn't true?
Because its GamesTM and they like to be controversial. Boiling Point, 9 anyone.
No that review was by a freelancer and they don't use them anymore. The magazine has changed so much over the last 18 months anyway.