Ghostbusters (2016) + Second movie trailer p18 - watch it and be horrified!

Skippy wrote:
Preezy wrote:Why is a film with female leads classed as a feminist film? Can't it just be a film? Jesus Skippy you've changed.

Whether it was intended to be a feminist film or not, it's become one because of all the misogyny surrounding its existence.

Does that make the latest Fantastic Four film a black power film because of the racist comments that were made about the casting of the Human Torch?

I just watched the second trailer.

Oh Stay Puft....what have they done to you? :cry:

He's not some sort of empowered homosexual is he?

Jurassic World was gooseberry fool also. It's box office taking is as baffling to me as the Transformer movies.

Website

I wish people would strawberry float off with the misogyny accusations. The film looks gooseberry fool. It's that simple. Nothing to do with the cast.

Tragic Magic wrote:I wish people would strawberry float off with the misogyny accusations. The film looks gooseberry fool. It's that simple. Nothing to do with the cast.

[cal]Didn't you get the memo? We're not supposed to criticise anything remotely involving women, homosexuals or Jewish people any more[/cal]

:shifty:

Lagamorph wrote:I just watched the second trailer.

Oh Stay Puft....what have they done to you?

That wasn't The Marshmallow Man it was the ghost in the Ghostbusters logo. Yeah.

Wow, some big baby's in here. I think it looks fun.

I thought the first trailer looked crap, however I took my 10 year old nephew to see Civil War and the trailer came on and he said he liked it. Now, I have made sure he has been raised on a staple diet of classic kids films, Star Wars, Goonies, classic Ghostbusters etc, so he is aware of quality in his movie tastes.

So I wonder if it is just a generational thing. I'm going to give this chance, I doubt I'll like it but then I'm not the target audience.

Memento Mori wrote:
Lagamorph wrote:I just watched the second trailer.

Oh Stay Puft....what have they done to you?

That wasn't The Marshmallow Man it was the ghost in the Ghostbusters logo. Yeah.

Oh god.

That's even worse.

The trailer makes it look awful, but then I'm not a big fan of Feig's work... Bridesmaids was dreadful really, I've never really understood why its that highly rated...

It'll probably do some good with some form of role models for young uns though, but as a film it looks by the numbers really... Plus it giving away spoilers in the trailer surrounding what happens to Chris Hemsworth, because always have to do something stupid like that...

State of this thread though :dread:

Looks bloody awful. I don't get why it appears to be some sort of semi-reeboot ... why couldn't it have been an unnumbered sequel where the girls buy the franchise from venkman or something? They could have had it being he was holding on to it going for a return one day, Egon dies (a nice reverence to real life), Peter decides is not going to be the same and sells the franchise on, the girls buy it being fans of the guys since kids but don't know much so are woeful and have to learn as they go.

But hey lol women and over is fat lol.

My main thing is why is it following pretty much the exact same plot? Its Star Wars all over again - but this time really gooseberry fool!

if you want too see a just as bad remake check out the Lethal Weapon trailer :dread:

Also hey isn't there a TV version of Rush Hour

They remade Lethal Weapon ? What the actual strawberry float for???????

floydfreak wrote:if you want too see a just as bad remake check out the Lethal Weapon trailer

I really wish I hadn't watched that.

This Lethal Weapon trailer! :lol:

What's wrong with the Lethal Weapon trailer? It looks like a fairly cheesy action movie, sure, but it doesn't look terrible.

Ghostbusters (2016) + Second movie trailer p18 - watch it and be horrified!

Who is online

Affiliates