TigaSefi wrote:So just to be clear, the Greek are now in the same position as however many weeks ago before the new government was put in place ?
Depends what you mean by weeks.
They're a in much worse place than last year, largely due to elections in Jan, policy changes and lots of the limited measures being undone/halted. Last year they were "recovering, but highly vulnerable". Now they're "screwed"
From the article I posted weeks ago (IMF summary, so it has it's own perspective!)
1. At the time of the last review in May 2014 (the IMF’s Fifth Review under the extended arrangement), public debt dynamics were considered to be sustainable but highly vulnerable.
2. If the program had been implemented as assumed, no further debt relief would have been needed under the agreed November 2012 framework
3. However, very significant changes in policies and in the outlook since early this year have resulted in a substantial increase in financing needs
4. Financing needs add up to over €50 billion over the three-year period from October 2015 to end–2018
5. It is unlikely that Greece will be able to close its financing gaps from the markets on terms consistent with debt sustainability
6. Even with concessional financing through 2018, debt would remain very high for decades and highly vulnerable to shocks
7. Given the extraordinarily concessional terms that now apply to the bulk of Greece’s debt, the debt/GDP ratio is not a very meaningful proxy for the forward-looking debt burden
8. If the program were implemented as specified at the last review, debt servicing would have been within the recommended threshold of 15 percent of GDP on average during 2016–45
9. However, the debt dynamics would still be very vulnerable
10. Given the fragile debt dynamics, further concessions are necessary to restore debt sustainability
11. Under the Fund’s exceptional access criteria, debt sustainability needs to be assessed with high probability
12. The analysis is robust to somewhat lower growth and primary surplus targets.
There was some quote from Tspras (I think it was to the EU Parliment) where he said he was elected and made these changes because the Greeks found them "a burden".
If you mean literally "weeks ago". It's hard to see how they're in anything but a much worse position. The deal they've accepted is much much harsher than the one they ignored till it ran out, and the government campaigned against and the public rejected in a referendum - and most concessions are vague or ethereal. They've definitely lost more than they gained there,.
They've had bank/capital controls which look chuffin terrible - all reports of the impact of the street vary from source to source. It's hard to imagine business turnover/profit has decreased (and therefor tax on the those that actually pay it: P) - some might even have folded.
They've blown a massive chunk of good will from large elements of their "partners" who they need to negioate with. Not all, but I'd say most. And although it's increased support from lunatic rabid Anti-EU Farage parties, it's hard to see this in reality as a "net win". Phyrric Victory at best.
The government is looking pretty fractured based on the vote last night, and might not last long (god knows what will happen if a new one's elected on another "we're not paying or changing but we want your money").
So overall they're in a much worse position.