Game of the Decade Discussion Thread - Winner at 9pm

Dalagonash wrote:Why does Skippy have any reason to rig it

Why does he have any reason not to? It's just for correctness, I'd expect anyone to make the results public. I mean, this is srs business after all.

This is why we can't have nice things.

Because of this competition I've started playing Galaxy again. No idea why I stopped. It really is marvellous. More fun than Half Life 2? Absolutely. Better? .......... hmmmm, undecided at the moment, I might stick Half Life 2 on later, I've still got the episodes to play.

Bene Version 3 wrote:Because of this competition I've started playing Galaxy again. No idea why I stopped. It really is marvellous. More fun than Half Life 2? Absolutely. Better? .......... hmmmm, undecided at the moment, I might stick Half Life 2 on later, I've still got the episodes to play.

If your dubious before playing the episodes then it's no competition for you, they're absolutely brilliant and will definitely sway you onto HL2+eps

I fail to see how a game can be 'more fun' and NOT be better.

Whether a game is exhilirating, intense, scary, enthralling - it all boils down to how fun it is. The funner a game is, surely the better it is?

I mean they are totally different games, but surely 'fun' is where they definitely can be compared?

Frankly, If find it an outrage that the Episodes are included. By that rationale, surely we could just wait a few months and include Galaxy 2 with galaxy, seeing as it's an expansion?

Banjo wrote:Frankly, If find it an outrage that the Episodes are included. By that rationale, surely we could just wait a few months and include Galaxy 2 with galaxy, seeing as it's an expansion?

I couldn't have asked for a better reply.

I've lost track of all of this. Can we still vote? What's happening?

PM Skippy with your vote before Monday.

Banjo wrote:PM Skippy with your vote before Monday.

fuckyeah.jpg

DML wrote:I fail to see how a game can be 'more fun' and NOT be better.

Whether a game is exhilirating, intense, scary, enthralling - it all boils down to how fun it is. The funner a game is, surely the better it is?

I mean they are totally different games, but surely 'fun' is where they definitely can be compared?

I don't want fun from games. I want joy. Fun makes you smile...joy changes the way you feel.


And Zellery - put all this energy you have towards a voting system on a games forum, into doing a charity event and send that money to Haiti or Chile, you self-centred, myopic person.

Songwriter wrote:

DML wrote:I fail to see how a game can be 'more fun' and NOT be better.

Whether a game is exhilirating, intense, scary, enthralling - it all boils down to how fun it is. The funner a game is, surely the better it is?

I mean they are totally different games, but surely 'fun' is where they definitely can be compared?

I don't want fun from games. I want joy. Fun makes you smile...joy changes the way you feel.


And Zellery - put all this energy you have towards a voting system on a games forum, into doing a charity event and send that money to Haiti or Chile, you self-centred, myopic person.

Fun is your personal enjoyment. If you say you enjoyed a game because it is "fun" then what you are saying is "I enjoyed this game because I enjoyed this game".

Since when can't you express your own opinion on here anymore without tens of people jumping down your throat?

Since this thread started.

Zellery wrote:Since when can't you express your own opinion on here anymore without tens of people jumping down your throat?

Since you joined GRcade

I hope the winner is never announced so that this doesn't have to end.

Everyone's a winner!

Apart from Deus Ex.

You used to be cool Banjo.