PsychicSykes wrote:I haven't seen a derailment this spectacular since that one Final Destination film.
Photek wrote:Corazon de Leon wrote:Photek wrote:Corazon de Leon wrote:Photek wrote:I think English folk should celebrate St Georges Day and not feel ashamed because of the idiots, I do not think they should celebrate their history however, yes many countries are ashamed of the past but not many countries have Englands past.
Why shouldn't they celebrate their history? Remember the bad things, celebrate the good(if that's what you're into). The English have contributed a lot to the arts and sciences, should that be washed away because of the colonialist past? Which, I should note, Wales and Scotland were equally involved in at the time.
As Dan says, not many countries are as old as England. If you look at any area of the world you'll find atrocities carried out in the name of something, at some time, from the American attitude towards Native Americans to South American mass sacrifices to Genghis Kahn raping and pillaging his way across the Asian continent to Japanese experimentation on Chinese POWs to the Holocaust.
Rubbish argument, thread isn't national strawberry floating China Day or Japanese day, every time I bring up England's horrific history all I get is "everyone else was a bastard" it's a stupid argument, just face up to the atrocities the English committed and stop referencing others.
The point is that in a thread about being proud to be English you've said that English people shouldn't celebrate their history. The point I made is that other countries celebrate their history even with atrocious aspects of it - look at Belgium, Germany, USA(particularly the USA, actually) etc etc. Do you level the same criticism at them whenever they choose to celebrate their nationality?
To use an example - I believe your significant other is American. When she celebrates Independence Day(if she does), do you remind her that their country was built on the corpses of a thousand dead Natives, or that within the last fifty years Americans committed atrocities in Vietnam? If not, then why do you feel the need to barge in here to remind everyone that the British Empire was bad?
(To disclaim, I'm very interested in the USA and I am not against their right to be proud of their history any more than I am against the right of the English, or the Irish or anyone else to be proud of theirs. I'm not a nationalist as I say, but I fail to see the problem with those who are).
I have a different opinion, look first off, for the umpteenth time I only brought history up after Cal did, ive said also umpteen strawberry floating times that you should be proud to be English, I just think when they discuss their 'glorious days of rule' and the 'British Empire (Third Reich)' that they ignore completly the atrocities, all other countries probably do the same but I know more about English History in Ireland than most English do.
Couple of points there boss:
1. I identify as Scottish, not English. I'm not proud to be anything, and have stated my non-nationalist ideals in this very thread. Cal's proud of english history(and I never thought I'd be sticking up for the guy), which he has every right to be. England has been the catalyst for a great many scientific and social achievements, great thinkers like Isaac Newton etc etc are English and I completely understand why you'd be proud to come from the same country as those blokes.
You steamed in with a blanket suggestion that English people shouldn't be proud of their history, at all, and were rightly jumped on. I should think it goes without saying that no-one in this thread is seriously proud of the Battle of the Boyne, or Cromwell killing a million catholics, or the murder of indigenous Africans/Indians/Native Americans/Aboriginals. Only an idiot would try and defend that.
2. I know plenty about English history in Ireland (and Scotland for that matter), from the War of the Three Kingdoms through the Penal Laws to Bloody Sunday and beyond. Not only is it part of my cultural history, I also have two degrees in history. I hate to be *that* guy who whips out his credentials during a discussion, but I sense patronisation from your posts and I do not like the implication that I don't know what I'm talking about.
3. Who the strawberry float mentioned glorious days of rule in here?
And lastly, I've never heard an Englishman refer to Cromwell as Lord Protector at Arms. He killed Scots as well as Irish, and isn't very well liked in the UK. There's a reason people laugh at Cromwell societies.