Missing Megan - A moral Dilemma Bird back in Blighty

Moggy wrote:He is a fool if he hasn't. His life is about to be destroyed so he may as well have screwed her.

If however he hasn't screwed her, can they even charge him with anything?

If she agreed to go to France then he can't get done for kidnapping, he may lose his job, but I don't think they can put him on the sex offenders register if he never did anything to her right?

StayDead wrote:
Moggy wrote:He is a fool if he hasn't. His life is about to be destroyed so he may as well have screwed her.

If however he hasn't screwed her, can they even charge him with anything?

If she agreed to go to France then he can't get done for kidnapping, he may lose his job, but I don't think they can put him on the sex offenders register if he never did anything to her right?

Even if she agreed to go I think he can still be charged with abduction due to her age. He's taken a minor out of the country without parental consent.

Last edited by Cal on Fri Sep 28, 2012 5:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Fatal Exception wrote:They surely can't examine her pumpum without her permission, it would be sexual assault.

Uniformed police officers with an arrest warrant say otherwise.

Anyway, I suppose she could refuse to be physically examined. I don't know what the law here - or there - says about that. In the UK, refusing to cooperate (i.e. not answering questions, not surrendering passwords, etc) is a criminal offence now as far as I know. Perhaps refusing to allow an intimate physical examination falls into that category.

Lagamorph wrote:He's taken a minor out of the country without parental consent.

Cal wrote:
Fatal Exception wrote:They surely can't examine her pumpum without her permission, it would be sexual assault.

Uniformed police officers with an arrest warrant say otherwise.

Anyway, I suppose she could refuse to be physically examined. I don't know what the law here - or there - says about that. In the UK, refusing to cooperate (i.e. not answering questions, not surrendering passwords, etc) is a criminal offence now as far I know. Perhaps refusing to allow an intimate physical examination falls into that category.

If that were the case then suspected rape victims could be prosecuted if they refused an internal examination to avoid having to go through more trauma, since they're "refusing to cooperate with a police investigation".

Poser wrote:
Lagamorph wrote:He's taken a minor out of the country without parental consent.

Aye, I bet he plundered her shaft.

Lagamorph wrote:If that were the case then suspected rape victims could be prosecuted if they refused an internal examination to avoid having to go through more trauma, since they're "refusing to cooperate with a police investigation".

Good point. As I said, I don't really know what the law says about these things. I suppose if she does refuse a physical examination she's as good as damned him anyway, so why not just go along with it?

StayDead wrote:
Moggy wrote:He is a fool if he hasn't. His life is about to be destroyed so he may as well have screwed her.

If however he hasn't screwed her, can they even charge him with anything?

If she agreed to go to France then he can't get done for kidnapping, he may lose his job, but I don't think they can put him on the sex offenders register if he never did anything to her right?

He will lose his job (and be unemployable as a teacher) as he has had a relationship with her (whether sexual or not). Everyone will also assume that he has strawberry floated her. Whether he goes to jail or not, his life will be destroyed. In other words, he might as well have plundered her.

Just saying, if I went abroad with her for just a casual jaunt and got accused of all this Id strawberry float holy hell out of her on principle.

Cal wrote:
Lagamorph wrote:If that were the case then suspected rape victims could be prosecuted if they refused an internal examination to avoid having to go through more trauma, since they're "refusing to cooperate with a police investigation".

Good point. As I said, I don't really know what the law says about these things. I suppose if she does refuse a physical examination she's as good as damned him anyway, so why not just go along with it?

Because she might not want a stranger performing an invasive internal examination on a very intimate and private part of her body?

Is it still abducting if she went on her own? I mean she theoretically could have gone to france on her own, and he just went along with the ride to make sure that she was safe.

Technically she could see it like that but it will be taken as abduction and if she says that it will just be said that he manipulated her,

He was apparently using his own passport at hotels and driving his own car. I'd rather flee for the rest of my life than face what he faces now.

Seriously, he wasn't even trying.

So, maths teachers make rubbish international covert operatives, eh?

I heard on BBC News that he's going to be charged with Child Abduction

'Child' abduction. :fp:

I guess this means they can't prove sex, which means he can't be charged with having sex with an under-age person or sexual relations in a position of trust. At least not yet.

Child abduction might be a hard one to make stick though.

Yeah. Not much a jury can really do if the girl gets on the stand and says she willingly went along with it all.

If she testifies that she went of her own free will then they dont have gooseberry fool to go on do they?

'Abuse of trust with a minor' is a criminal offence is it not?

Falsey wrote:If she testifies that she went of her own free will then they dont have gooseberry fool to go on do they?

At her age I'm sure they would claim she is immature and doesn't know what she is saying. He is totally and completely strawberry floated.

Missing Megan - A moral Dilemma Bird back in Blighty

Who is online

Affiliates

Missing Megan - A moral Dilemma *Bird back in Blighty*

Who is online

Affiliates

Missing Megan - A moral Dilemma Bird back in Blighty