Page 47 of 309

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 2:24 pm
by Frank
Skippy's description has made me go from "interested" to "oh. Maybe one for the netflix list". Making it a musical would certainly make it a bit different from every other action/crime car-chase caper. I've never really *got* Edgar Wright.

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 2:32 pm
by Poser
Frank wrote:Making it a musical would certainly make it a bit different from every other action/crime car-chase caper.


Not every other one, surely...

Image


(I wasn't really taking you literally, I just wanted to post a Blues Brothers gif).

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 2:58 pm
by Skippy
Frank wrote:Skippy's description has made me go from "interested" to "oh. Maybe one for the netflix list". Making it a musical would certainly make it a bit different from every other action/crime car-chase caper. I've never really *got* Edgar Wright.


If there's one thing Edgar Wright can do well, it's put together a mean film soundtrack

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:02 pm
by Skippy
Here's a different trailer


Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 11:08 pm
by Floex

twitter.com/io9/status/841423946293628933



This would be a great fit. Didn't know he was in for the running with Superman before.

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:39 am
by Lotus
Baby Driver looks equal parts good and hilariously bad. He's the best...BECAUSE HE LISTENS TO MUSIC. :lol: :fp:

I read something about the car chases etc being 'choreographed' to the music that 'Baby' is listening to, which sounds...intriguing.

Lily James though. :datass:

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:01 am
by Preezy
I'd be delighted to see another Superman film, especially if Zak Snyder wasn't directing it.

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:31 am
by Moggy
Would Matthew Vaughn directing mean that Superman finally gets to take Lois Lane up the wrong 'un?

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:01 am
by Corazon de Leon
Poser wrote:
Skippy wrote:That's a bit misleading. It's a musical as in its licensed soundtrack is deeply embedded in the film and its story, but it's not a musical as in song-and-dance numbers.


Aha, ok, that sounds much better.

I remember starting Sunshine on Leith without knowing anything about it. Lasted less than four minutes. :slol:


Awful movie about an awful city, which I am likely to have to move to in the next few months. :slol:

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:46 pm
by Jingle Ord The Way
strawberry float Off! Edinburgh is awesome!

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 5:24 pm
by Skippy
Image

Great poster. Trailer must be imminent

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 6:27 pm
by Jam-Master Jay
They better not strawberry float it up.

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Sun Mar 19, 2017 11:19 pm
by Frank
Just seen Disney's live-action Mulan isn't going to have any of the songs. Total insanity. Not even slightly interested now.

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 8:14 am
by Moggy
Jam-Master Jay wrote:They better not strawberry float it up.


This.

I am looking forward to and absolutely dreading the Dark Tower movie.

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:13 am
by Poser
Moggy wrote:
Jam-Master Jay wrote:They better not strawberry float it up.


This.

I am looking forward to and absolutely dreading the Dark Tower movie.


Same goes for IT.

But that DT poster does look great. I think the issue with DT is, it's not going to be that much like the books. It'd be impossible. The chronology will be all over the place, and what it comes down to is how much those who have read the books are prepared to forgive.

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:18 am
by Moggy
Poser wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Jam-Master Jay wrote:They better not strawberry float it up.


This.

I am looking forward to and absolutely dreading the Dark Tower movie.


Same goes for IT.

But that DT poster does look great. I think the issue with DT is, it's not going to be that much like the books. It'd be impossible. The chronology will be all over the place, and what it comes down to is how much those who have read the books are prepared to forgive.


I have already assumed that IT will be dreadful. IT being terrible will not be as bad as the Dark Tower being shite as (although I have fond memories of it) the old TV version of it wasn't great. Other than Tim Curry who was awesome.

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:25 am
by Gandalf
Moggy wrote:
Poser wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Jam-Master Jay wrote:They better not strawberry float it up.


This.

I am looking forward to and absolutely dreading the Dark Tower movie.


Same goes for IT.

But that DT poster does look great. I think the issue with DT is, it's not going to be that much like the books. It'd be impossible. The chronology will be all over the place, and what it comes down to is how much those who have read the books are prepared to forgive.


I have already assumed that IT will be dreadful. IT being terrible will not be as bad as the Dark Tower being shite as (although I have fond memories of it) the old TV version of it wasn't great. Other than Tim Curry who was awesome.


That IT TV show, back in the day, was acceptable. But to watch it now is so cringe worthy! I'll keep faith with the new IT. They re-made Salems Lot (which wasn't too bad and was kept quite close to the source material.)

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:28 am
by Moggy
Gandalf wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Poser wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Jam-Master Jay wrote:They better not strawberry float it up.


This.

I am looking forward to and absolutely dreading the Dark Tower movie.


Same goes for IT.

But that DT poster does look great. I think the issue with DT is, it's not going to be that much like the books. It'd be impossible. The chronology will be all over the place, and what it comes down to is how much those who have read the books are prepared to forgive.


I have already assumed that IT will be dreadful. IT being terrible will not be as bad as the Dark Tower being shite as (although I have fond memories of it) the old TV version of it wasn't great. Other than Tim Curry who was awesome.


That IT TV show, back in the day, was acceptable. But to watch it now is so cringe worthy!


What ruined it was (spoilers for the IT book!): they didn't even bother doing the massive underage gangbang. :x :x :x

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:35 am
by Gandalf
Moggy wrote:
Gandalf wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Poser wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Jam-Master Jay wrote:They better not strawberry float it up.


This.

I am looking forward to and absolutely dreading the Dark Tower movie.


Same goes for IT.

But that DT poster does look great. I think the issue with DT is, it's not going to be that much like the books. It'd be impossible. The chronology will be all over the place, and what it comes down to is how much those who have read the books are prepared to forgive.


I have already assumed that IT will be dreadful. IT being terrible will not be as bad as the Dark Tower being shite as (although I have fond memories of it) the old TV version of it wasn't great. Other than Tim Curry who was awesome.


That IT TV show, back in the day, was acceptable. But to watch it now is so cringe worthy!


What ruined it was (spoilers for the IT book!): they didn't even bother doing the massive underage gangbang. :x :x :x


Bev's beaver! :datass:

Re: Movie News/Discussion Thread 2

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:02 am
by Poser
Moggy wrote:
I have already assumed that IT will be dreadful. IT being terrible will not be as bad as the Dark Tower being shite as (although I have fond memories of it) the old TV version of it wasn't great. Other than Tim Curry who was awesome.


Stephen King was tweeting his approval of the direction they've taken IT, so it may yet pan out. I just want them to make it really strawberry floating scary. I am acting more in hope than anything else, though. I do think scrapping the back-and-forth chronology is a good idea - two films to cover the 50s/80s is probaly the best way to focus on making the films good.

The old TV version was, as you say, terrible. It hasn't stood the test of time at all - I think it's fondly remembered because people watched it as kids and shat themselves. But it's really dated nowadays.