Star Trek Discovery

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Karl
Imi Wakannai
Imi Wakannai
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Karl » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:54 am

The episode descriptions were always gold as well.

The crew helps Data investigate when his dream program begins suddenly generating nightmares. Meanwhile, Picard attempts to avoid attending a boring Starfleet banquet.

:lol: :wub:

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Hexx » Wed Oct 11, 2017 11:54 am

Karl wrote:I think this is why I don't mind Season 2 as much as some people; for me even a lot of the bad eps were fun. I only disliked Season 1 because the characters hadn't found their voices yet.


It had Pulaski.

So you're a wrong wrong'un who's wrong.

User avatar
Lagamorph
Member ♥
Joined in 2010

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Lagamorph » Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:24 pm

Hexx wrote:
Karl wrote:I think this is why I don't mind Season 2 as much as some people; for me even a lot of the bad eps were fun. I only disliked Season 1 because the characters hadn't found their voices yet.


It had Pulaski.

So you're a wrong wrong'un who's wrong.

Yeah Pulaski was strawberry floating awful. Thank God she left and never came back.

Tasha though :wub:

Lagamorph's Underwater Photography Thread
Zellery wrote:Good post Lagamorph.
Turboman wrote:Lagomorph..... Is ..... Right
User avatar
Cuttooth
Moderator
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Cuttooth » Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:30 pm

I liked Pulaski because she did not give a gooseberry fool about Data's sapience whatsoever and would basically think it weird Geordi was his best friend. She treated him like absolute gooseberry fool sometimes. :lol:

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Hexx » Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:31 pm

Cuttooth wrote:I liked Pulaski because she did not give a gooseberry fool about Data's sapience whatsoever and would basically think it weird Geordi was his best friend. She treated him like absolute gooseberry fool sometimes. :lol:


:shock:

:o

:fp:

User avatar
Lagamorph
Member ♥
Joined in 2010

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Lagamorph » Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:41 pm

Cuttooth wrote:I liked Pulaski because she did not give a gooseberry fool about Data's sapience whatsoever and would basically think it weird Geordi was his best friend. She treated him like absolute gooseberry fool sometimes. :lol:

Reminds me of the episode where some dick wanted to take Data apart and when Data refused the guy said Data had no rights and was just a machine that Starfleet owned and decided to take it to court. Was ridiculous that they made Riker have to argue that Data wasn't alive, and do a good job of it, or he'd be court martialled :fp:

Made no sense either since surely this question would've been answered when Data was first found or when he applied to join Starfleet.

Lagamorph's Underwater Photography Thread
Zellery wrote:Good post Lagamorph.
Turboman wrote:Lagomorph..... Is ..... Right
User avatar
Garth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008
Location: Norn Iron

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Garth » Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:56 am

Episode 5 was great!

Image
User avatar
Irene Demova
Member
Joined in 2009
AKA: Karl

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Irene Demova » Mon Oct 16, 2017 4:02 am

I thought it was total gooseberry fool and I wasn't even that harsh on the last one...

Maybe it'll be more enjoyable for people who get that one of the worst single episode acting performances in tv history is apparently fanservice or something

User avatar
Lagamorph
Member ♥
Joined in 2010

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Lagamorph » Mon Oct 16, 2017 9:51 am

Hearing the word "strawberry floating" in Star Trek just seems so wrong.

Also, it keeps bothering me that the logo on their uniforms and displays is completely wrong.

Lagamorph's Underwater Photography Thread
Zellery wrote:Good post Lagamorph.
Turboman wrote:Lagomorph..... Is ..... Right
User avatar
Return_of_the_STAR
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Northampton

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Return_of_the_STAR » Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:16 am

Another good episode. Really enjoying this.

Also were they start fleet pjs at the end?

Image

GRAPL Heavyweight Champion 2010, Runner Up 2017, tag team Champion 2011, 2015, Wrestlemania PPV Winner 2012 and your current all time highest GRAPL points scorer.
Fixture feeling champion 2013.

I'm a Paul Heyman guy!
User avatar
Tafdolphin
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Tafdolphin » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:51 pm

Lagamorph wrote:Hearing the word "strawberry floating" in Star Trek just seems so wrong.

Also, it keeps bothering me that the logo on their uniforms and displays is completely wrong.


Some of the comm badges (including Michael's) look like they have a simplified Zerg logo on them. Which is odd.

Image
Image

Goat wrote:Guy probably decided not to show up because he heard Taffy was a Cow-exploding fantasist mentalist.

Bloggy blog blog blog.
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Hexx » Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:55 pm

Return_of_the_STAR wrote:Another good episode. Really enjoying this.

Also were they start fleet pjs at the end?


Matching Star Trek PJs :lol:

Who the hell thought the F-bomb was a good idea though?

User avatar
Oblomov Boblomov
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mind Crime, SSBM_God

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Oblomov Boblomov » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:05 pm

Another bag of gooseberry fool, saved only by the first seemingly likeable character of the entire series making an appearance. Thank strawberry float the captain got him back safely to the ship. Now give him proper airtime and let's see how this develops.

Image
User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Squinty » Mon Oct 16, 2017 5:37 pm

I liked it. Feels like it is setting up some stuff for late season.

Definitely better the previous one.

User avatar
Lagamorph
Member ♥
Joined in 2010

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Lagamorph » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:23 pm

Tafdolphin wrote:
Lagamorph wrote:Hearing the word "strawberry floating" in Star Trek just seems so wrong.

Also, it keeps bothering me that the logo on their uniforms and displays is completely wrong.


Some of the comm badges (including Michael's) look like they have a simplified Zerg logo on them. Which is odd.

Image
Image

Thing is, at this point every single ship had it's own insignia. The insignia they're using was in use only by the Enterprise at the time, yet Discovery is applying it to the entirety of Starfleet, something that only happened after TOS but before Star Trek The Motion Picture.

Lagamorph's Underwater Photography Thread
Zellery wrote:Good post Lagamorph.
Turboman wrote:Lagomorph..... Is ..... Right
User avatar
Somebody Else's Problem
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
Location: Wherever you want me to be, baby

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Somebody Else's Problem » Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:00 pm

Lagamorph wrote:Thing is, at this point every single ship had it's own insignia. The insignia they're using was in use only by the Enterprise at the time, yet Discovery is applying it to the entirety of Starfleet, something that only happened after TOS but before Star Trek The Motion Picture.


Didn't that get written out of canon a long time ago?

Also, swearing? In MY Star Trek?

ImageImage
User avatar
Corazon de Leon
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Deadpool / sntaa

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Corazon de Leon » Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:05 pm

Thought that episode was good. Not sure who Irene is referring to. This looks absolutely fantastic too.

Image Image
User avatar
No:1 Final Fantasy Fan
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: UK

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by No:1 Final Fantasy Fan » Tue Oct 17, 2017 11:13 pm

not liking this spore drive drivel lol

User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Squinty » Wed Oct 18, 2017 7:27 am

No:1 Final Fantasy Fan wrote:not liking this spore drive drivel lol


I think it is an interesting idea but it makes me wonder what they'll do to get rid of it. Or should I say, what will happen in order for them to make that decision.

Klingons are still totally gooseberry fool though. I appauld them for attempting to do something different, but it isn't really working so far.

User avatar
Lagamorph
Member ♥
Joined in 2010

PostRe: Star Trek Discovery
by Lagamorph » Wed Oct 18, 2017 8:46 am

Squinty wrote:
No:1 Final Fantasy Fan wrote:not liking this spore drive drivel lol


I think it is an interesting idea but it makes me wonder what they'll do to get rid of it. Or should I say, what will happen in order for them to make that decision.

Given that it needs a living being to be painfully plugged in for it to function, plus the risk that using it will turn every living being on the ship inside out, I imagine it'd basically be declared too dangerous/unstable/unethical to use and all material related to it is classified and archived away to be forgotten about.

Lagamorph's Underwater Photography Thread
Zellery wrote:Good post Lagamorph.
Turboman wrote:Lagomorph..... Is ..... Right

Return to “Stuff”