Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:29 pm
Skippy wrote:Star Trek fans
Page 28 of 51
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:44 pm
Skippy wrote:Star Trek fans
NERDSSSSS
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 10:08 pm
That was probably my favourite episode so far 
It reminded me of previous Star Trek series...a problem to be solved in one episode and good character development 
I keep forgetting she's half Vulcan....emotionless sorta lol
It reminded me of previous Star Trek series...a problem to be solved in one episode and good character development I keep forgetting she's half Vulcan....emotionless sorta lolRe: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 2:46 am
I can deal with the time travel stuff but no way can I suspend my belief to the point I'm supposed to believe Mudd would be punching on that scale.
Seriously though, that ending was all kinds of gooseberry fool.
Seriously though, that ending was all kinds of gooseberry fool.
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 3:10 am
Star Trek has never got time travel right, it always feels rushed and filled with stupid holes and happen-stance.
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:40 am
Xeno wrote:Star Trek has never got time travel right, it always feels rushed and filled with stupid holes and happen-stance.
Not entirely true, there are some episodes involving time displacement or time travel that work well. In no particular order: Yesterday's Enterprise, All Good Things, The City on the Edge of Forever, The Sound of Her Voice, and Trials and Tribble-ations.
And in the movies you've got Star Trek: First Contact and Star Trek IV : The Voyage Home
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 11:34 am
Xeno wrote:Star Trek has never got time travel right, it always feels rushed and filled with stupid holes and happen-stance.
Cause and Effect which is what this episode directly lifts does time travel much better, I think the fact Michael was the focus, and not the one not in the loop kinda broke how the episode should run. The ending also made no sense, seemed everything fell into place for no reason on one attempt
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2017 11:19 pm
Finally caught up with this week's episode and that was the worst one so far for me. The frat party felt completely out of place and Mudd is a completely different character. I don't know why they didn't just give him a different name and have him be this series recurring humorous baddie.
Focusing on Michael every episode is starting to wear thin when the rest of the cast seem much more interesting.
Focusing on Michael every episode is starting to wear thin when the rest of the cast seem much more interesting.
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2017 11:44 pm
Winckle wrote:Star Trek: First Contact
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 7:19 am
Watched the episode yesterday, and I don't think it really worked. The groundhog day idea has been done to death, there was some interesting stuff in there, but it didn't really work as a whole. I echo the annoying focus on Michael, Lorca is way more interesting.
The blonde scientist guy is blatantly going to go insane at some point.
The blonde scientist guy is blatantly going to go insane at some point.
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 9:54 am
Karl wrote:Winckle wrote:Star Trek: First Contact
Voyage Home was better, don't @ me.
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 10:17 am
Again, I really like this week's episode. The ending was pisspoor, properly awful stuff, but it was fun before that.
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:01 am
Watching the latest episode and they're getting stardates wrong and it's really bugging me. This episode said it was stardate 1308 yet the previous episode was stardate 2316. That would put episode 8 at taking place about 8 months or so before episode 7.
Also saying the Federation has no Death penalty is wrong. During TOS they did have a death penalty for a few select general order offences.
Also saying the Federation has no Death penalty is wrong. During TOS they did have a death penalty for a few select general order offences.
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:56 am
Didn’t like that much. 3 disparate storylines that didn’t seem to add much to anything
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:03 pm
I just realised some people may not have seen the episode yet.
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:01 pm
Thought that was a decent episode, definitely the most traditional Trek feeling of the series.
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:21 pm
I liked that episode, maybe the best out of them all so far. I liked the idea of the harmony spirit planet.
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:09 am
The needs of the many outweighs the needs of the few or the one...unless you want to Bone the one.
Feck this show
Feck this show
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:59 pm
That episode was probably the most Star Trek one so far. Saying that, it wasn't too great, but it does setup some stuff, I guess. Definitely better than the one preceding it.
Re: Star Trek Discovery
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 4:06 pm
Enjoyed this weeks episode. Is next weeks the last of the series? Also did she really kill the admiral? I was absolutely convinced that she was just going to knock her out to pretend that she was dead.