BAKA wrote:I genuinely Googled that because I thought you were having a laugh. I had no idea, very interesting. It seems so lo-fi that I actually respect it a little more on a design front, but also find myself returning to the price point with an increasing scepticism.
Seeing as the thing here that is making you sceptical about the price point is the fact the device contains less processing power than you thought it did, I have to assume this scepticism is driven from a value perspective (you think that the device isn't offering enough for its £280 price point).
Given that its processing power that has moved you to this point I think its only fair to compare the price against other devices running similar (or in these cases) the same type of processor.
There are currently (as far as I'm aware) two devices on the market using a similar Nvidia processor (perhaps not quite the same as what Nvidia is giving to Nintendo is supposedly tweaked for them in some ways). The processor is the X1 and the devices are the Nvidia Shield TV and the Pixel C.
The Pixel C is a 10" tablet with a 2560 x 1800 resolution screen with 3GB of RAM. It comes (or was available) in 32GB and 64GB versions for either £399 or £479
The Nvidia Shield TV is a smart TV box with no portability at all, it does come with a games controller and it also has 3GB of RAM. It comes in two version also 16GB or 500GB HDD for £179.99 or £279.99.
It seems to me that the hardware of the Switch puts it between these two devices (not in terms of functionality, but in terms of what you get for your money). And the price point matches that very nicely.