Politics Thread 5

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by KK » Tue Aug 07, 2018 7:26 am

This story today a bit of a funny coincidence...

Moderate Labour MPs have been holding secret meetings in a luxury farmhouse to plot a takeover of the party, it was claimed last night.

Around 12 MPs are said to have met at the Sussex holiday estate at least twice to plan the fightback.

The group was said to have included former leadership candidate Liz Kendall and Stephen Kinnock, the former party leader’s son.

The £144 for one night accommodation on a 12-acre site is set within wonderful gardens and accommodation includes a stunning Grade II Listed Sussex farmhouse - Fair Oak Farm - built around 1600.

The most recent meeting was in May, it was claimed. Former shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna and and independent MP John Woodcock are also said to have attended.

A source at the meetings told the Express: ‘We are getting together regularly to discuss how to take back control of the party.

‘At some point the Corbyn leadership is going to fail and collapse, we only need to see what is happening with the anti-Semitism problem, and we need to be ready to step in, win the leadership rebuild the party as a credible force and repair the damage that has been done.’

Plotters were said to have travelled to the village of Stonegate from Waterloo East before taking a taxi to the historic farm site.

Among the plans reportedly discussed were proposals for a new party and a scheme to block Mr Corbyn from becoming PM even if he won an election.

One person who attended apparently said that some pro-Remain Conservative and Lib Dem MPs would be interested in joining a centrist movement.


Other meetings are said to have taken place elsewhere.

Mr Kinnock said he did not recall the meeting, saying that if they were taking place he had 'yet to receive an invitation'.

Another reported attendee, Chris Leslie, said the meetings were about policy development and said he met with colleagues 'all the time', saying it was good to get out of Westminster.

He said: 'I can’t recall Jeremy Corbyn featuring in the discussion at all.'

http://www.dailyfail.co.uk/news/article ... house.html

Image
User avatar
BID0
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Essex

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by BID0 » Tue Aug 07, 2018 8:07 am

That went well for them last time. And the time before that.

User avatar
Hypes
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Beyond the wall

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Hypes » Tue Aug 07, 2018 8:08 am

Big fan of the 'I do not recall the meeting' excuse. Kinnock's played it excellently there

User avatar
Rex Kramer
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Rex Kramer » Tue Aug 07, 2018 8:15 am

I'm torn on this. Having more choice when it comes to voting should be a good thing but the system is stacked to only give one of two parties any chance of governing. Would fragmenting the vote just lead to a Tory dominance or would it make coalitions more likely?

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Moggy » Tue Aug 07, 2018 8:25 am

Rex Kramer wrote:I'm torn on this. Having more choice when it comes to voting should be a good thing but the system is stacked to only give one of two parties any chance of governing. Would fragmenting the vote just lead to a Tory dominance or would it make coalitions more likely?


If there was a significant number of Tory defections then it might stop Tory dominance. Otherwise it is doomed to failure.

At the moment there are not enough Labour/Lib Dem/Green/SNP MPs to take power. Splitting the Labour vote between old Labour and “New New” Labour is only going to help the Tories.

User avatar
Rex Kramer
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Rex Kramer » Tue Aug 07, 2018 8:37 am

Moggy wrote:
Rex Kramer wrote:I'm torn on this. Having more choice when it comes to voting should be a good thing but the system is stacked to only give one of two parties any chance of governing. Would fragmenting the vote just lead to a Tory dominance or would it make coalitions more likely?


If there was a significant number of Tory defections then it might stop Tory dominance. Otherwise it is doomed to failure.

At the moment there are not enough Labour/Lib Dem/Green/SNP MPs to take power. Splitting the Labour vote between old Labour and “New New” Labour is only going to help the Tories.

But you would imagine there are a chunk of centre right Tories who might baulk at a shift further to the right. I just feel there are a lot of voters sitting centre right and left who aren't represented by the two leading parties. The Lib Dems under Cable have been a disaster, right at the point where they could have actually made a difference.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Moggy » Tue Aug 07, 2018 8:50 am

Rex Kramer wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Rex Kramer wrote:I'm torn on this. Having more choice when it comes to voting should be a good thing but the system is stacked to only give one of two parties any chance of governing. Would fragmenting the vote just lead to a Tory dominance or would it make coalitions more likely?


If there was a significant number of Tory defections then it might stop Tory dominance. Otherwise it is doomed to failure.

At the moment there are not enough Labour/Lib Dem/Green/SNP MPs to take power. Splitting the Labour vote between old Labour and “New New” Labour is only going to help the Tories.

But you would imagine there are a chunk of centre right Tories who might baulk at a shift further to the right. I just feel there are a lot of voters sitting centre right and left who aren't represented by the two leading parties. The Lib Dems under Cable have been a disaster, right at the point where they could have actually made a difference.


I agree, that's why I said it would need a significant number of Tories to make a jump over to a new party.

All three main UK parties are appalling at the moment. Corbyn, May and Cable leading parties as Brexit is going on. strawberry float me. :fp:

User avatar
Lotus
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Lotus » Tue Aug 07, 2018 8:56 am

I heard some vague utterings about the Lib Dems the other day and genuinely had to stop, think and try and remember who the party leader was. I had to look it up in the end. :slol:
They just don't seem to do anything, other than Tim Farron ranting about the gays. They're pretty much a non-entity.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Moggy » Tue Aug 07, 2018 9:01 am

Lotus wrote:I heard some vague utterings about the Lib Dems the other day and genuinely had to stop, think and try and remember who the party leader was. I had to look it up in the end. :slol:
They just don't seem to do anything, other than Tim Farron ranting about the gays. They're pretty much a non-entity.


Just over 3 years ago they were in (joint) power.

It is truly astonishing just how much the political landscape has changed since 2015.

User avatar
BID0
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Essex

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by BID0 » Tue Aug 07, 2018 9:12 am

There would probably be less than 9 Tory MPs who would make the jump.

I don't think there's much of a market for the centre ground anyway as we live in a world where people have extreme/rabid black or white opinions.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Moggy » Tue Aug 07, 2018 9:16 am

BID0 wrote:There would probably be less than 9 Tory MPs who would make the jump.


So less numbers than the DUP.

I don't think there's much of a market for the centre ground anyway as we live in a world where people have extreme/rabid black or white opinions.


NO WE DON'T.

User avatar
Trelliz
Doctor ♥
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Trelliz » Tue Aug 07, 2018 9:35 am

Moggy wrote:
BID0 wrote:There would probably be less than 9 Tory MPs who would make the jump.


So less numbers than the DUP.

I don't think there's much of a market for the centre ground anyway as we live in a world where people have extreme/rabid black or white opinions.


NO WE DON'T.


YES YOU DO - I HAVE A CONVOLUTED YET NEBULOUS RESPONSE WHICH INVOLVES PHRASES LIKE "WILL OF THE PEOPLE" AND OTHER POLARISING TABLOID NONSENSE. ALSO THATCHER, GUY FAWKES AND PRINCESS DIANA FOR SOME REASON.

jawa2 wrote:Tl;dr Trelliz isn't a miserable git; he's right.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Moggy » Tue Aug 07, 2018 9:45 am

Trelliz wrote:
Moggy wrote:
BID0 wrote:There would probably be less than 9 Tory MPs who would make the jump.


So less numbers than the DUP.

I don't think there's much of a market for the centre ground anyway as we live in a world where people have extreme/rabid black or white opinions.


NO WE DON'T.


YES YOU DO - I HAVE A CONVOLUTED YET NEBULOUS RESPONSE WHICH INVOLVES PHRASES LIKE "WILL OF THE PEOPLE" AND OTHER POLARISING TABLOID NONSENSE. ALSO THATCHER, GUY FAWKES AND PRINCESS DIANA FOR SOME REASON.


WE ONLY BELIEVE IN FREE SPEECH BUT I GUESS YOU TYPES HATE THAT!

User avatar
That
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by That » Tue Aug 07, 2018 9:58 am

Moggy wrote:
Trelliz wrote:
Moggy wrote:
BID0 wrote:There would probably be less than 9 Tory MPs who would make the jump.


So less numbers than the DUP.

I don't think there's much of a market for the centre ground anyway as we live in a world where people have extreme/rabid black or white opinions.


NO WE DON'T.


YES YOU DO - I HAVE A CONVOLUTED YET NEBULOUS RESPONSE WHICH INVOLVES PHRASES LIKE "WILL OF THE PEOPLE" AND OTHER POLARISING TABLOID NONSENSE. ALSO THATCHER, GUY FAWKES AND PRINCESS DIANA FOR SOME REASON.


WE ONLY BELIEVE IN FREE SPEECH BUT I GUESS YOU TYPES HATE THAT!


MOGGY IS THE LEADER OF A SECRET RING OF REPTOSEXUALS WHO ARE BREEDING AN UNDERGROUND ARMY OF PSYCHIC HUMAN-ALIEN HYBRID SUPER SOLDIERS

Image
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Hexx » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:03 am

I'd totally watch a film about that.

User avatar
Trelliz
Doctor ♥
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Trelliz » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:14 am

Thats basically the plot of Hybrid Heaven on the N64, but needs more turn-based wrestling.

jawa2 wrote:Tl;dr Trelliz isn't a miserable git; he's right.
User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Squinty » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:44 am

Trelliz wrote:Thats basically the plot of Hybrid Heaven on the N64, but needs more turn-based wrestling.


Hybrid Heaven :wub: :datass:

User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by KK » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:19 am

Ukip has suspended three party members after an attack on a socialist bookshop in central London on Saturday.

A statement from the party’s chair, Tony McIntyre, said Elizabeth Jones, Luke Nash-Jones and Martin Costello had been suspended pending an investigation into the incident at Bookmarks bookshop in Bloomsbury.

“It is understood that the three members were involved in an incident at the Bookmarks bookshop in London on Saturday,” a Ukip statement said.

A spokesman for the shop said it had been inundated with messages of support after the attack.

Twelve men, one of whom was wearing a Donald Trump mask, entered the central London shop as staff were closing for the day, knocking over displays and ripping up magazines while chanting far-right slogans.

The shop, which is planning a free public “solidarity” event with appearances from authors on 11 August, said it had received messages of support from MPs and writers as well as thousands of activists from around the world.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/ ... -bookmarks

Image
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Hexx » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:22 am

Definitely not a racist party. Just a party loads of racists happen to join.

User avatar
Preezy
Skeletor
Joined in 2009
Location: SES Hammer of Vigilance

PostRe: Politics Thread 5
by Preezy » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:25 am

Can a bookshop have a political ideology?


Return to “Stuff”