Page 1 of 1

Car related accident outside Natural History Museum. Not a terror attack. Or was it?! #TruthNow

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 3:10 pm
by Saint of Killers
A car has been involved in a collision near the Natural History Museum in London, police say.

The Metropolitan Police said a "number" of people had been injured - but a BBC reporter at the scene said she was told by police the injuries were minor.

One person has been arrested at the scene.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41538762

Re: Possible car related "incident" outside National History Museum. Reporter told injuries are minor. Suspect arrested.

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 3:19 pm
by Saint of Killers
BBC reporter Chloe Hayward was leaving the Natural History Museum as the incident happened.

"I could see was a car diagonally across the road, looking like it was going into one of the boulders on the side of the road, and I could see a crowd of people around what was clearly one or two people on the pavement," she said.

She added there were now armed police at the scene.

"We have had lots of police coming onto the scene, helicopters above, and I can see an ambulance which is definitely having someone put in, but it isn't clear how bad that injury is."

Re: Possible car related "incident" outside National History Museum. Reporter told injuries are minor. Suspect detained.

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:49 pm
by KK
Apparently it's a registered taxi, so it could be an accident (though immediate scenes most likely rule that out), stolen, or maybe some sort of Uber related protest. Or, you know, terrorism.

Re: Possible car related "incident" outside National History Museum. Reporter told injuries are minor. Suspect detained.

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:02 pm
by SandyCoin
First instinct is obviously a terror attack but I shall wait and see. The fact it's minor injuries suggests it was probably an accident as surely if the driver wanted to actually kill people it wouldn't be too difficult in a car.

Re: Possible car related "incident" outside National History Museum. Reporter told injuries are minor. Suspect detained.

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:28 pm
by Lagamorph
Wouldn't be surprised if it was a case of driving while tired/drunk from the sounds of things.

Re: Possible car related "incident" outside National History Museum. Reporter told injuries are minor. Suspect detained.

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:38 pm
by Cuttooth
The Met are saying this isn’t terror related.

Re: Possible car related "incident" outside National History Museum. Reporter told injuries are minor. Suspect detained.

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:39 pm
by SandyCoin
Cuttooth wrote:The Met are saying this isn’t terror related.


Yeah, from the news it didn't sound like it. Although I'm sure ISIS will take responsibility.

Re: Possible car related "incident" outside National History Museum. Reporter told injuries are minor. Suspect detained.

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:47 pm
by Moggy
Guess what muppet was straight onto the phone to Fox News?

twitter.com/nigel_farage/status/916685819439697920



“Brexit Leader” :lol:

Re: Possible car related "incident" outside National History Museum. Reporter told injuries are minor. Suspect detained.

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:51 pm
by Knoyleo
Cuttooth wrote:The Met are saying this isn’t terror related.

What, they expect us to believe someone could just crash a car by accident? This reeks of a cover up.

#NaturalHistoryMuseumAttackTruthNow

Re: Possible car related "incident" outside National History Museum. Reporter told injuries are minor. Suspect detained.

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 6:34 pm
by KK
Daily Mail wrote:Terror at the museum: Driver 'deliberately mows down pedestrians'

In the constant drive to be first, you irresponsibly end up with headlines like this (derived from a quote from...somewhere) despite the police saying they didn't know. 'Terror at the museam as car knocks down pedestrians' would have had the same impact without being based on a whim.

This almost tangible disappointment on social media that it's just an accident (or an aggrieved individual) is really sad.

Re: Possible car related "incident" outside National History Museum. Reporter told injuries are minor. Suspect detained.

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:22 pm
by Saint of Killers
KK wrote:
Daily Mail wrote:Terror at the museum: Driver 'deliberately mows down pedestrians'

In the constant drive to be first, you irresponsibly end up with headlines like this (derived from a quote from...somewhere) despite the police saying they didn't know. 'Terror at the museam as car knocks down pedestrians' would have had the same impact without being based on a whim.

This almost tangible disappointment on social media that it's just an accident (or an aggrieved individual) is really sad.


Ditto the strawberry floats who come out with shite like this:

Knoyleo wrote:
Cuttooth wrote:The Met are saying this isn’t terror related.

What, they expect us to believe someone could just crash a car by accident? This reeks of a cover up.

#NaturalHistoryMuseumAttackTruthNow


Really does angry up the blood :x :x :x

Re: Car related accident outside National History Museum. Not a terror attack. Or was it?! #TruthNow

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:33 pm
by Hypes
Vince knows the truth

Image

Re: Car related accident outside Natural History Museum. Not a terror attack. Or was it?! #TruthNow

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 1:02 am
by Lagamorph
Image

What a complete and utter thundercunt.

Re: Car related accident outside Natural History Museum. Not a terror attack. Or was it?! #TruthNow

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 8:18 am
by Benzin
It's actually quite depressing how everyone wants any incident now to be a terrorist one...

Also proves once again that the desperation to get the story out first further causes problems, really need to start making news outlets responsible for printing such nonsense and stop then hiding these errors in tiny paragraphs...

Re: Car related accident outside Natural History Museum. Not a terror attack. Or was it?! #TruthNow

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 8:52 am
by KK
It wasn't a terrorist attack. Nobody died. BBC News got their facts right. It's just a complete strawberry floating disaster.

Re: Car related accident outside Natural History Museum. Not a terror attack. Or was it?! #TruthNow

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 9:03 am
by Moggy
Lagamorph wrote:Image

What a complete and utter thundercunt.


There are two possibilities with that daft twat.

1. She’s genuine.

2. She’s playing a character for those sweet Fox News dollars.

Option 1 means she must be literally hiding under her bed absolutely cowering in fear. Quite pitiful really.

Option 2 means she’s trying to turn other people into option 1. Utterly detestable.

Re: Car related accident outside Natural History Museum. Not a terror attack. Or was it?! #TruthNow

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 10:18 am
by Squinty
Hardly surprising for Katie Hopkins to do something like this. She's a bit crazy.

Re: Car related accident outside Natural History Museum. Not a terror attack. Or was it?! #TruthNow

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 10:33 am
by Knoyleo

twitter.com/Angry_Klopp/status/916732016053407749



twitter.com/hrtbps/status/916933652935856129


Re: Car related accident outside Natural History Museum. Not a terror attack. Or was it?! #TruthNow

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 10:51 am
by bear
Squinty wrote:Hardly surprising for Katie Hopkins to do something like this. She's a bit crazy.

She's not though. There's a market for this sort of gooseberry fool and she is playing to it.

Re: Car related accident outside Natural History Museum. Not a terror attack. Or was it?! #TruthNow

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 1:05 pm
by Rex Kramer
Don't we have laws prohibiting someone from profiting from terrorism?