Page 4 of 5

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:55 pm
by Qikz
bear wrote:Between Bethesda and Ubisoft.


PC != Microsoft.

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:57 pm
by BID0
Qikz wrote:Where is the PC one in the vote?

PC would obviously decimate the others, so this poll is really for second place.

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:04 pm
by chalkitdown
Love the 3 votes for gamerforever. :wub: Himself, Nick and Jawa with the three votes, obviously.

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 7:17 am
by gamerforever
Cheers guys, never thought i would get some fame on here. Voted for sony.

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 7:32 am
by NickSCFC
chalkitdown wrote:Love the 3 votes for gamerforever. :wub: Himself, Nick and Jawa with the three votes, obviously.


gamerforever > Microsoft

Thoroughly entertaining, can't wait to see what they bring next year.

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:18 am
by gamerforever
This is all too much - next E3 I probably won't be on GRcade anymore, so enjoy me whilst I'm here!

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:20 am
by NickSCFC
gamerforever wrote:This is all too much - next E3 I probably won't be on GRcade anymore, so enjoy me whilst I'm here!


Image

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 3:17 pm
by OrangeRakoon
"EA - No votes"

lol

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 3:40 pm
by Garth
OrangeRakoon wrote:"EA - No votes"

lol

In typical GRcade fashion, EA now has a vote :lol:

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 3:45 pm
by Death's Head
What does a vote for gamerforever represent? Some sort of tragicomedy presentation?

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 6:09 pm
by NickSCFC
Death's Head wrote:What does a vote for gamerforever represent? Some sort of tragicomedy presentation?


Liberté
Egalité
Fraternité

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 6:21 pm
by Karl
I can never tell if NickSCFC and Gamerforever are best friends or mortal enemies.

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 6:22 pm
by Skippy
EA - 4/10
Bethesda - 4/10
Microsoft - 8/10
Ubisoft - 6/10
Sony - 9/10

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:26 am
by Mafro
Kinda funny how everyone was criticising Nintendo for bringing Zelda and nothing else, and it ended up being the most talked about game. Their Treehouse stuff is always great but I had to stop watching because I didn't want too much spoiled.

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:33 am
by OrangeRakoon
It did help that they did show off several other games during Treehouse.

But yeah, they kind of smashed it with the all-out Zelda.

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:01 pm
by Captain Kinopio
Mafro wrote:Kinda funny how everyone was criticising Nintendo for bringing Zelda and nothing else, and it ended up being the most talked about game. Their Treehouse stuff is always great but I had to stop watching because I didn't want too much spoiled.


No, it's not really.

It's Zelda. If Nintendo had just done a normal direct it would still be the most talked about game.

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:27 pm
by Karl
Zelda Souls (I'm gonna call it that forever) is a source of absolutely huge excitement for me in a time in my life when generally I just dip in and out of games rather than really committing to them. I can't be alone in feeling that way, and from that perspective Nintendo's E3 is surely successful. It would have been better with a proper conference, but I still earnestly believe we will see a special NX-themed Nintendo Space World later this year.

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:37 pm
by Squinty
They done remarkably well with the little they were willing to cover.

Sony won this year. I don't have a Sony console, it hasn't really persuaded to invest in one, but it is clear they had the best showing.

It wasn't a great E3 for me on the whole.

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:46 pm
by gamerforever
More votes than MS? This is has got me be my year! :wub:

Re: Rate the E3 conferences - 2016

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:52 pm
by Captain Kinopio
Karl wrote:Zelda Souls (I'm gonna call it that forever) is a source of absolutely huge excitement for me in a time in my life when generally I just dip in and out of games rather than really committing to them. I can't be alone in feeling that way, and from that perspective Nintendo's E3 is surely successful. It would have been better with a proper conference, but I still earnestly believe we will see a special NX-themed Nintendo Space World later this year.


I would argue that this E3 has seen Nintendo become increasingly irrelevant.

The fact that Zelda looks good (great) does not mean this E3 has been a success for Nintendo.

From what I've seen they probably could have put together a better Direct than last year too.

30 minutes on a Zelda blowout.
10 on Pokemon Sun and Moon and the anniversary
5 on Mario Party
10 on Paper Mario
5 on other business.