Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x

Our best bits.
User avatar
False
Member ♥
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by False » Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:09 pm

Short term /=/ Not serious

Image
User avatar
Tomous
I Pissed My Pants
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Tomous » Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:11 pm

Fade wrote:I said they're not a great basis for a serious relationship. I didn't say "NO GOOD RELATIONSHIPS HAPPEN IF YOU SLEEP WITH SOMEONE WHEN YOU MEET THEM"

If you sleep with 10 people and only end up in a long term relationship with 1 of them, that is statistically and factually not a good basis for a serious relationship right?

Doesn't mean that one can't come of it, I never said that.


But they are a great basis for meeting people and potential partners. You're only supporting your argument that they're not by literally making up statistics...

I could just as easily say if you go on endless dates without any kind of physical chemistry, waiting to hold hands with 10 people and only end up in a long term relationship with 1 of them, that is statistically and factually not a good basis for a serious relationship.

User avatar
Tafdolphin
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Tafdolphin » Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:19 pm

Fade wrote:I said they're not a great basis for a serious relationship. I didn't say "NO GOOD RELATIONSHIPS HAPPEN IF YOU SLEEP WITH SOMEONE WHEN YOU MEET THEM"

If you sleep with 10 people and only end up in a long term relationship with 1 of them, that is statistically and factually not a good basis for a serious relationship right?

Doesn't mean that one can't come of it, I never said that.


This is the statement I was referring to. You accuse people of not "getting you" but are giving no consideration to methods different from your own, therefore setting yourself as someone superior and then getting all high and mighty when people call you on it.

You don't strawberry float on a first date. Some people do. Some of those first-date-fucks turn into lifelong relationships. Accept that and move on.

Gemini73 wrote:Yes your are a sanctimonious twat

Bloggy blog blog blog.

Night Call: a game what I worked on
User avatar
Fade
Member
Joined in 2011
Location: San Junipero

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Fade » Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:24 pm

Tafdolphin wrote:
Fade wrote:I said they're not a great basis for a serious relationship. I didn't say "NO GOOD RELATIONSHIPS HAPPEN IF YOU SLEEP WITH SOMEONE WHEN YOU MEET THEM"

If you sleep with 10 people and only end up in a long term relationship with 1 of them, that is statistically and factually not a good basis for a serious relationship right?

Doesn't mean that one can't come of it, I never said that.


This is the statement I was referring to. You accuse people of not "getting you" but are giving no consideration to methods different from your own, therefore setting yourself as someone superior and then getting all high and mighty when people call you on it.

You don't strawberry float on a first date. Some people do. Some of those first-date-fucks turn into lifelong relationships. Accept that and move on.

I did. The only reason we are having this conversation is because people started criticising my way of doing things without knowing anything about me or who I'm dating.

I don't give a gooseberry fool what other people do :lol:

Image
User avatar
Corazon de Leon
Doctor ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Deadpool / sntaa

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Corazon de Leon » Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:39 pm

Why post here in the relationship advice thread if you're going to dismiss quite casually all of the advice that's given about your potential relationship?

Image Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Moggy » Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:47 pm

Tafdolphin wrote:
Fade wrote:You guys really don't like people who do things differently to yourselves do you? Every time I post in here I get some kind of gooseberry fool for doing things differently.


Because you're coming in here and making huge sweeping statements that are blatantly misguided, like the fact that no decent relationship starts with sex.

Tone it down a bit grandad.


That's almost exactly what I was going to say.

Fade, you've come into the thread for advice and rather than listen to anybody you've basically just laughed at the idea that people can get intimate quickly and yet still end up in a long term loving relationship.

Why that sounds ridiculous to us is because the majority of us are in long term relationships that started getting sexual quickly while you are asking for advice on how to kiss a girl after 5 dates.

It's fine that you/her/both want to take it slow. I certainly wouldn't judge you for that. The issue was with your condescending sounding posts on those of us that are not chaste until we've been married for 3 years.

User avatar
Fade
Member
Joined in 2011
Location: San Junipero

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Fade » Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:59 pm

I didn't ask for any advice after responding to Banjo.

And I originally asked for advice from people that had dated overly shy girls.

Image
User avatar
Ad7
Member
Joined in 2009

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Ad7 » Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:04 pm

I have never dated a shy girl, don't think I could have back in the day.

My Mrs and I floated after our first date and we're getting married, it happens.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Moggy » Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:31 pm

Fade wrote:I didn't ask for any advice after responding to Banjo.

And I originally asked for advice from people that had dated overly shy girls.


Whatever dude :lol:

User avatar
Tafdolphin
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Tafdolphin » Sun Mar 05, 2017 7:43 pm

Fade:

Asks question, gets answers, ignores answers, tells everyone that sex is a terrible basis for a relationship, gets offended, rides off into the sexless sunset.

Fin

Gemini73 wrote:Yes your are a sanctimonious twat

Bloggy blog blog blog.

Night Call: a game what I worked on
User avatar
Fade
Member
Joined in 2011
Location: San Junipero

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Fade » Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:01 pm

Image

Image
User avatar
Rax
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Raxicori

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Rax » Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:45 am

Tafdolphin wrote:Fade:

Asks question, gets answers, ignores answers, tells everyone that sex is a terrible basis for a relationship, gets offended, rides off into the sexless sunset, posts gif

Fin

User avatar
Poser
Banned
Joined in 2008
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Poser » Mon Mar 06, 2017 2:32 pm

At least we know now whose alt N1FFF is.

Image
User avatar
Karl
Seyana!
Seyana!
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Karl » Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:00 pm

Yo Fade, I am quite shy and my girlfriend is also quite shy. It took us quite a while to get to know each other, and I probably waited a bit too long to make my intentions clear -- I was pretty low on self-confidence at the time. Regardless, it worked out and once we knew for sure how we felt about each other the relationship progressed reasonably quickly. The way I see it shyness is definitely a barrier to making that first step but it doesn't mean you or her want intimacy any less than a 'not shy' couple, and you say you've been on a half-dozen dates, so I think it's reasonable to say she does know you well enough to make a decision on whether she wants to try having a relationship with you or not.

If you've really made your intentions clear I would be a bit worried about the lack of reciprocation at this stage. If not, you don't have to be super pushy, but she has to know that you like her in a girlfriend way rather than just as a mate. Maybe you've said that you do, but if you aren't acting on it at all then she might be wondering if you really mean it.

Also, you shouldn't be so dismissive of other people's relationship advice. I'm sure it's not intentional but your attitude comes across as a bit rude to be honest, and that's why the thread turns a bit hostile when you post.

User avatar
Finiarél
Member
Joined in 2010
Location: Liverpool

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Finiarél » Wed Apr 05, 2017 6:53 pm

So. I'm going to her Dads house on Saturday for permission to ask her to marry me... :dread: :dread: :dread: :dread:

glowy69 wrote:Being from the hood won't save you from an alien mate.
User avatar
That's not a growth
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by That's not a growth » Wed Apr 05, 2017 7:00 pm

I only glanced and thought you were fade for a second and assumed something alarming had happened.

It's that really normal these days? Good luck anyway!

User avatar
Corazon de Leon
Doctor ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Deadpool / sntaa

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Corazon de Leon » Wed Apr 05, 2017 7:08 pm

Good luck buddy!

Image Image
User avatar
Rocsteady
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Rocsteady » Wed Apr 05, 2017 8:56 pm

Christ that seems archaic, fair play though.

Image
User avatar
Cheeky Devlin
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: The Dark And Lonely Regions, Where Nobody Goes.
Contact:

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by Cheeky Devlin » Thu Apr 06, 2017 12:14 am

It's old fashioned but it's a nice touch I think. Though it does run the risk of him saying "strawberry float no" and ruining all the plans.

Check out some of our stuff!
Image Image Image

JOIN OUR MINECRAFT REALM HERE!
User avatar
smurphy
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: A Little Cocky Child
Location: Scotland

PostRe: Relationship Thread V.2 - Canyonero! :x
by smurphy » Thu Apr 06, 2017 1:06 am

Well she's her father's property so if he didn't ask it would be like stealing.


Return to “Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests