Pence is getting credit for doing the bare minimum a politician should in these events - but there's something unpleasant in his words as well
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mik ... 24727556c4“The president also made clear that behaviour by others of different militant perspectives are also unacceptable in our political debate and discourse. [...] I will say I take issue with the fact that many in the national media spent more time criticising the president’s words than they did criticising those that perpetrated the violence to begin with.”
The factionalisation of events/false labeling of groups is actually really rather insidious.
It's not "racists" vs "everyone else" (or even "non racists"). It's "Alt-Right" vs "Antifa". Both are subsets. Both are militant groups. Both are extreme/fringe perspectives.
Both Trump and Pence have effectively portrayed "anti racist" now as a minority militant perspective.
Both Pence and Trump have presented both sides as equivalent - and in the minds of large elements of the population it'll work to alter perspective on events. It's marginalizes and legitimizes one side as it's pushed equivalent to the other.
Gamergate was widely seen as a precursor to the rise of the alt-right - and you can see lots of the same tactics being used to gain traction.
It wasn't "conspiracy theorists"/"misogynistic trolls" and "everyone else", it had to be "Gamergate" and "anti-Gamergate".
The la belling of the "anti" position was a key tool in their armory in an attempt to gain traction and make progress.
In the minds of people that didn't know better it presented both as fringe groups, and therefore most people would assume the truth was "likely" in the middle.
It small use of words - but it redefined both what the "mainstream/status quo" position was to be instead some militant fringe perspective, and what a "compromise" position would be (to the advantage of GG...)