US Politics - Trump cancels summit having to do with North Korea

twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/912679043476189184

twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/914107927136522241

twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/914334772742311936

twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/914497947517227008

twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/914565910798782465

lex-man wrote:He keeps saying these kind of things but he is yet to anything. At this point I think he'll be running his mouth until he's out of power

twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/914565910798782465

Hundreds of White House emails sent to third Kushner family account
White House officials are reviewing a third email account associated with Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner’s private email domain.

White House officials have begun examining emails associated with a third and previously unreported email account on Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump’s private domain, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Hundreds of emails have been sent since January from White House addresses to accounts on the Kushner family domain, these people said. Many of those emails went not to Kushner’s or Ivanka Trump’s personal addresses but to an account they both had access to and shared with their personal household staff for family scheduling.

The emails—which include non-public travel documents, internal schedules and some official White House materials—were in many cases sent from Ivanka Trump, her assistant Bridges Lamar and others who work with the couple in the White House. The emails to the third account were largely sent from White House accounts but occasionally came from other private accounts, one of these people said.

The existence of additional accounts on the family domain beyond the two personal accounts used by Kushner and Ivanka Trump and reported earlier raises new questions about the extent of personal email use by the couple during their time as White House aides. Their use of private email accounts for White House business also raises concerns about the security of potentially sensitive government documents which have been forwarded to private accounts.

The family has declined to say what privacy measures have been placed on the domain, but a person familiar with the set-up said some security measures were taken when it was installed.

Many details about the ijkfamily.com email domain remain unclear, including what type of security protections are in place.

The accounts would have been more secure if they relied on commercial email providers rather than a private server, some experts say. “If you’re using a commercial email service provider, you’re really reducing the risk,” according to Lewis, because the major tech companies that run platforms like Gmail and Outlook typically have robust security teams. “If you’re doing your own email, it gets to be a lot easier [to hack],” he added.

twitter.com/bradheath/status/915039472517083136

Alvin Flummux wrote:The only thing the Trumps haven't yet done is hosted their private email server in their home.

Alvin Flummux wrote:The only thing the Trumps haven't yet done is hosted their private email server in their home.

Moggy wrote:

Alvin Flummux wrote:The only thing the Trumps haven't yet done is hosted their private email server in their home.

Has anybody checked the server room at Mar-a-Lago?

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Alvin Flummux wrote:The only thing the Trumps haven't yet done is hosted their private email server in their home.

Has anybody checked the server room at Mar-a-Lago?

Yeah - but only the Russians, Chinese, Germans, French, British, Turks and North Koreans. An American has yet to set foot in that room.

Moggy wrote:

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Alvin Flummux wrote:The only thing the Trumps haven't yet done is hosted their private email server in their home.

Has anybody checked the server room at Mar-a-Lago?

Yeah - but only the Russians, Chinese, Germans, French, British, Turks and North Koreans. An American has yet to set foot in that room.

Don’t be stupid. There is no way the Brits are allowed in there.

Garth wrote:The US voted against a UN ban on using the death penalty as punishment for homosexuality

Other countries on the UN Human Rights Council that voted against the resolution:
Bangladesh, Botswana, Burundi, China, Japan, Qatar, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Iraq, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia

It passed though with 27 votes in favour of the resolution.