US Politics - Trump cancels summit having to do with North Korea

Our best bits.
User avatar
Green Gecko
Treasurer
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics - search warrant sought for Cambridge Analytica
by Green Gecko » Tue Mar 27, 2018 12:22 am

kerr9000 wrote:"I told my kids on the school walkout, I love you, (abut) if you walk out that school, walk out my house,"

That quote just really annoys me as a parent. I debate politics, religion and well everything with my daughter, we agree on lots of stuff but disagree on plenty as well and if she wanted to protest something at school I'd have her back and support her right to do so regardless of if I agree or not. Seems like he just wants little robot versions of himself. I find that rather sad.

And yet, and I quote:

During the interview, Killer Mike criticises those who think they are "woke" to the cause for tighter gun control in America, saying: "You're a lackey of the progressive movement, because you've never disagreed with the people who tell you what to do."

So I guess it's bad for people to just do what they're told, unless it's your children not doing what their told and going to exercise free speech.

strawberry floating muppet.

But I always enjoy finding such logical inconsistencies in the space of so few sentences, at which point it's time to stop listening to that person because they are just spouting bollocks.

"It should be common sense to just accept the message Nintendo are sending out through their actions."
_________________________________________

❤ btw GRcade costs money and depends on donations - please support one of the UK's oldest video gaming forums → HOW TO DONATE
User avatar
kerr9000
Member
Joined in 2013

PostRe: US Politics - 60 Russian intelligence officers expelled from US, Seattle Consulate closed
by kerr9000 » Tue Mar 27, 2018 12:26 am

LOL I read it and didnt really notice that being basically a big contradiction till you pointed it out, its pretty funny with it like you said being not to far away from the other statement. :)

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics - 60 Russian intelligence officers expelled from US, Seattle Consulate closed
by Moggy » Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:02 am

Brerlappin wrote:Really what did you expect from someone called Killer Mike? Hes not called Rational Debate Mike.


Killers don't kill people, Mike kills people.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics - 60 Russian intelligence officers expelled from US, Seattle Consulate closed
by Moggy » Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:10 am

Remember this story the next time you hear about "lefties" hating free speech and getting things like the Daily Mail taken off of trains.

Cosmopolitan, one of the world's largest magazines, is being removed from view at thousands of checkouts by the US supermarket giant Walmart.

The move has been celebrated as a victory by a conservative non-profit group that has lobbied against the magazine's "hyper-sexualised" content for years.

The National Centre on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) said they had been in "collaborative dialogue" with Walmart for months.

In a statement, Walmart said the change was "primarily a business decision" but "concerns raised were heard".

They said that while it would be removed from checkouts, Cosmopolitan would still be available to purchase in designated magazine sections in store.

Cosmopolitan, which has a print and online reach of tens of millions, has yet to comment publicly on the decision.

Founded originally in the late 19th Century, the magazine underwent a feminist renaissance in the 1960s when it became known for pushing the envelope for sexual content, fashion and entertainment gossip.

That reputation has continued today, with dozens of international editions, which Cosmopolitan says cater for the "fun, fearless female".

Walmart's decision - celebrated by NCOSE as a #MeToo development - raises more questions than answers about where lines are drawn.

Promo girls have been the axed from some sporting events in the UK for similar reasons.

Hayley Halverson, Vice-President of Advocacy and Outreach for NCOSE, told the BBC that they think the magazine sends the same messages about female sexuality as publications such as Playboy.

"It's filled with articles that are extremely sexually graphic, encouraging its young readership to engage in everything from sexting, to watching pornography. It's also promoting things such as group acts and other forms of risky sex," she says.

Ms Halverson believes the magazine targets a "young female demographic" with its bright covers and cover stars, such as former Disney actors.

Her organisation, formerly known as Morality in Media, has already successfully lobbied US hotel chains including Hyatt to stop providing adult films to guests.

Supporters of the NCOSE applauded Walmart's decision on social media, while others questioned its logic.

"The magazine has a lot of hyper-sexualised images of women, something that has unfortunately become ubiquitous in our society," Ms Halverson says.

"We think they're really contributing to a culture that is normalising male sexual entitlement which gives rise to things like the #MeToo problem."

Both Kirsten King, who has written for Cosmopolitan on women's issues, and freelance feminist writer Suzannah Weiss disagree with the characterisation of the move as part of the #MeToo conversation.

Ms Weiss told the BBC it seemed as if the language of feminism and #MeToo was being co-opted in this particular argument.

"You can't conflate sex with sexism and say everything related to sexuality is morally wrong," she said.

"I sort of agree with them that Cosmopolitan can be problematic.

"But I don't know if they're the worst offender. They have some valid points but I don't really buy that it's corrupting people in the way they're saying."

Kirsten King describes folding Walmart's decision in with #MeToo as "a stretch". She said that she believed the move was unfair because it created "another double standard for women" as magazines such as Men's Fitness weren't getting the same treatment.

"When women talk about sex, people tend to get incredibly uncomfortable. I don't think it's Selena Gomez in a crop top that is making people uncomfortable here," she says.

"Saying it's inappropriate for children to see women's bodies teaches children that women's bodies are inappropriate.

"Your child could be walking down the street in a crop top or bikini and shouldn't be taught that's wrong or bad, or is pornography."

Ms Halverson from NCOSE argues that women's magazines and Cosmo in particular, seem to reinforce ideas of male sexual entitlement.

"If it really was about empowering women they would focus on ways women can get ahead in their careers and other positive coverage," she says.

"They may have a niche article now and then. But any cover you pick up will talk about how to please a man sexually."

Kirsten King, who has herself written opinion pieces for Cosmopolitan, disagrees.

"As a teen, Cosmo was where I learned a lot about sex, and while that education was not perfect, in the US sexual education can be super flawed," Ms King says.

"I'm a queer woman and I've had the chance to write a couple of op-eds for Cosmo - and maybe that's helped some other blossoming queer kid realise who they are too."

"The more conversations we have about women's health and sexuality the better. Work has to be done to make them more nuanced, but eliminating them completely or deeming them inappropriate doesn't get us anywhere."

All three agreed that women's magazines had more to do in their representations of women and female sexuality.

"The images we see of women are predominantly sexualised, so we get the idea that is the only acceptable way to be and that's the most important thing about you," writer Suzannah Weiss says.

She points to the work being done by newer female-led platforms such as Bitch Media.

"At the moment, there aren't really magazine covers with women who don't fit the conventional moulds."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-43564543

User avatar
That
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics - 60 Russian intelligence officers expelled from US, Seattle Consulate closed
by That » Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:15 am

Brerlappin wrote:Really what did you expect from someone called Killer Mike? Hes not called Rational Debate Mike.

:lol:

Image
User avatar
Preezy
Skeletor
Joined in 2009
Location: SES Hammer of Vigilance

PostRe: US Politics - 60 Russian intelligence officers expelled from US, Seattle Consulate closed
by Preezy » Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:23 am

Moggy wrote:
The move has been celebrated as a victory by a conservative non-profit group that has lobbied against the magazine's "hyper-sexualised" content for years.

Image

User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: US Politics - 60 Russian intelligence officers expelled from US, Seattle Consulate closed
by KK » Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:08 pm

THE SEX POLICE strike again, for it knows no party lines.

Image
User avatar
Monkey Man
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics - Trump invites Putin to the White House
by Monkey Man » Tue Apr 03, 2018 2:09 pm

3pm today -

twitter.com/NYDailyNews/status/980788201756377089



Mueller authorized by DOJ to investigate alleged Manafort collusion with Russian government

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein told special counsel Robert Mueller in a classified August 2, 2017, memo that he should investigate allegations that President Donald Trump's former campaign chairman Paul Manafort was "colluding with Russian government officials" to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, prosecutors in the Russia probe revealed late Monday night.

Mueller was also empowered by Rosenstein to investigate Manafort's payments from Ukrainian politicians, a cornerstone of the Trump adviser's decades-long lobbying career that has resulted in several financial criminal charges so far.

The revelation of the August 2 memo comes amid a broader court filing from Mueller's prosecutors that offers a full-throated defense of their investigative powers and indictments thus far. In the filing, the special counsel's office argues that a federal judge should not throw out Manafort's case. Manafort has sought to have the case dismissed, arguing that the charges against him are outside of Mueller's authority.

Manafort is scheduled to face a jury in Virginia in July, then awaits trial in DC in September.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/04/03/poli ... ssion=true

Image
User avatar
Garth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008
Location: Norn Iron

PostRe: US Politics - Trump invites Putin to the White House
by Garth » Tue Apr 03, 2018 9:50 pm

Apparently there's been gunfire at YouTube HQ. Police confirmed there's a shooter, don't know if they got them or not yet.

twitter.com/NBCNews/status/981271029430538240


User avatar
Garth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008
Location: Norn Iron

PostRe: US Politics - Trump invites Putin to the White House
by Garth » Tue Apr 03, 2018 9:53 pm

twitter.com/BBCBreaking/status/981272827889422337


User avatar
Cuttooth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics - Trump invites Putin to the White House
by Cuttooth » Tue Apr 03, 2018 10:03 pm

The Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital?

User avatar
Alvin Flummux
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: US Politics - Trump invites Putin to the White House
by Alvin Flummux » Tue Apr 03, 2018 10:03 pm

YouTube has a headquarters? :o

User avatar
Knoyleo
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics - Trump invites Putin to the White House
by Knoyleo » Tue Apr 03, 2018 10:13 pm

Amazed there isn't a livestream.

pjbetman wrote:That's the stupidest thing ive ever read on here i think.
User avatar
Victor Mildew
Member
Joined in 2009

PostRe: US Politics - Trump invites Putin to the White House
by Victor Mildew » Tue Apr 03, 2018 10:21 pm

I'm trying to watch the live feed but it just keeps buffering and pushing ads.

Hexx wrote:Ad7 is older and balder than I thought.
User avatar
Peter Crisp
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics - Trump invites Putin to the White House
by Peter Crisp » Tue Apr 03, 2018 10:36 pm

Alvin Flummux wrote:YouTube has a headquarters? :o


Why are you surprised it has a HQ?
How else did you think they operated?

It's gone a bit beyond a couple of nerds in a bedroom.

Vermilion wrote:I'd rather live in Luton.
User avatar
Alvin Flummux
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: US Politics - Trump invites Putin to the White House
by Alvin Flummux » Wed Apr 04, 2018 1:46 am

Peter Crisp wrote:
Alvin Flummux wrote:YouTube has a headquarters? :o


Why are you surprised it has a HQ?
How else did you think they operated?


I kinda just assumed that, being owned by Google, they wouldn't have their own HQ any more. I also thought maybe they had a decentralized power structure.

User avatar
captain red dog
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Bristol, UK

PostRe: US Politics - Trump invites Putin to the White House
by captain red dog » Wed Apr 04, 2018 9:39 am

Sounds like the motive was demonetisation of YouTube clips. I'm amazed she had any clips monetised at all as I have seen a couple this morning and they are appalling.

User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: US Politics - Trump invites Putin to the White House
by Squinty » Wed Apr 04, 2018 10:39 am

What an insane thing to do, for something like this :dread:

Total strawberry floating melter.

User avatar
Jenuall
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Jenuall
Location: 40 light-years outside of the Exeter nebula
Contact:

PostRe: US Politics - Trump invites Putin to the White House
by Jenuall » Wed Apr 04, 2018 11:08 am

"A well monetised video streaming channel being necessary to the security of all millennials egos, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

User avatar
<]:^D
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics - Trump invites Putin to the White House
by <]:^D » Wed Apr 04, 2018 11:11 am

youtube is quite annoying but this is a bit of an over reaction


Return to “Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 252 guests