Sherlock

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
That's not a growth
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Sherlock
by That's not a growth » Mon Jan 04, 2016 1:23 pm

I thought they made it clear he didn't survive and this was either someone else or something he set up before his death.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Sherlock
by Moggy » Tue Jan 05, 2016 9:53 am

I enjoyed the episode but it would have been much better if they had just done a one off episode set in the Victorian era, rather than the whole thing being part of modern day Sherlock's mind palace.

And I don't think Moriarty survived, he has just set up stuff to happen after his death.

Skippy
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Sherlock
by Skippy » Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:11 am

My assumption was always that Moriarty never died, but then this episode started with a mystery about how someone fake shot themselves in the head and I assumed it'd be entirely about how to get Moriarty back up and running. Then at the end "Nah he's actually dead lol". It's Moffat strawberry floating with his audience then tugging himself off out of pride

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Sherlock
by Moggy » Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:15 am

Skippy wrote:My assumption was always that Moriarty never died, but then this episode started with a mystery about how someone fake shot themselves in the head and I assumed it'd be entirely about how to get Moriarty back up and running. Then at the end "Nah he's actually dead lol". It's Moffat strawberry floating with his audience then tugging himself off out of pride


I'll end up that Moriarty never existed and it was all the dark part of Sherlock's mind.

User avatar
Monkey Man
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Sherlock
by Monkey Man » Sun Jul 24, 2016 8:35 pm


Image
User avatar
Monkey Man
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Sherlock
by Monkey Man » Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:56 pm

twitter.com/Sherlock221B/status/791338622087757824


Image
User avatar
Hypes
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Beyond the wall

PostRe: Sherlock
by Hypes » Sun Jan 01, 2017 1:29 pm

Back on today :toot:
Watched S3 e3 yesterday to remind myself what happened given that it's 3 years since the last series. Too long, think I'd happily swap more Sherlock for Doctor Who if that was possible.

User avatar
Rhubarb
Member
Joined in 2013

PostRe: Sherlock
by Rhubarb » Sun Jan 01, 2017 10:08 pm

That was terrible.

User avatar
Floex
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Sherlock
by Floex » Sun Jan 01, 2017 10:09 pm

Hmm, it wasn't great was it.

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Sherlock
by Hexx » Sun Jan 01, 2017 10:11 pm

When it was fun and adventure it was good entertainment - when it went arc/serious drama it's all so po faced its hard to care.

The last 15 are boring a we get three every few years and this was ware of time

But the various mysteries were all so little and quickly sloved.

User avatar
Hypes
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Beyond the wall

PostRe: Sherlock
by Hypes » Sun Jan 01, 2017 10:14 pm

Hmm yes I was bored as well. I don't really care what Mary used to do and all the governmental guff, I want to see Sherlock do Jonathan Creek.

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Sherlock
by Hexx » Sun Jan 01, 2017 10:20 pm

Wiki summary now

"Is a bit gooseberry fool. That's all. Mary dies

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Sherlock
by Hexx » Sun Jan 01, 2017 10:48 pm

"We all carried an unencrypted memory stick each with all our information on us at all times as a mutually assured destruction insurance technique to ensure complete trust within our crack team. We all swore we'd never share it and that it would be devastatingating if one were found. This was a great and foolproof scheme. Despite showing in the very episode an obvious setback: capture of death would necessitate an immediate and improvised requirement to hide or destroy one or more sticks. We were a crack team of experts."


:D

User avatar
satriales
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Sherlock
by satriales » Mon Jan 02, 2017 1:09 am

I enjoyed it but that's probably more due to it being so long since the last episode.
I had a feeling they would kill Mary off as her and Martin Freeman split up in real life, then when Sherlock kept saying he would protect her it seemed pretty obvious what would happen.
The Moriarty stuff was also really poor. They've been teasing his 'comeback' for years now but they managed to mention his name a lot without progressing that plot at all.

The case with dead guy in the car was good but solved too quickly. It feels like ages since they a proper mystery episode.

Sir Delboy
Member
Joined in 2014

PostRe: Sherlock
by Sir Delboy » Mon Jan 02, 2017 10:13 am

satriales wrote:I enjoyed it but that's probably more due to it being so long since the last episode.
I had a feeling they would kill Mary off as her and Martin Freeman split up in real life, then when Sherlock kept saying he would protect her it seemed pretty obvious what would happen.
The Moriarty stuff was also really poor. They've been teasing his 'comeback' for years now but they managed to mention his name a lot without progressing that plot at all.

The case with dead guy in the car was good but solved too quickly. It feels like ages since they a proper mystery episode.


This.

I really hope next week's is a proper mystery that lasts the whole episode. Also loooking forward to seeing what Toby Jones brings as well as he's brilliant in everything I've seen him do.

PSN: Delboy1984
NNID: Delboy84
TWITTER: @SirDelboy
STEAM: Delboy1984
User avatar
Johnny Ryall
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Macraig
Location: Box Elder, MO

PostRe: Sherlock
by Johnny Ryall » Mon Jan 02, 2017 1:09 pm

Hexx wrote:
"We all carried an unencrypted memory stick each with all our information on us at all times as a mutually assured destruction insurance technique to ensure complete trust within our crack team. We all swore we'd never share it and that it would be devastatingating if one were found. This was a great and foolproof scheme. Despite showing in the very episode an obvious setback: capture of death would necessitate an immediate and improvised requirement to hide or destroy one or more sticks. We were a crack team of experts."


:D


Glad I wasn't alone thinking that. The USB stick gooseberry fool reeks of writers who don't actually use technology.

User avatar
The Watching Artist
Scrub
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Sherlock
by The Watching Artist » Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:06 am

Sir Delboy wrote:Also loooking forward to seeing what Toby Jones brings as well as he's brilliant in everything I've seen him do.

He was in this ep to at 1:08:31

Image
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Sherlock
by Hexx » Tue Jan 03, 2017 11:10 am

This feels very very apt

http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-better-ve ... -tired-of/

While I still love Sherlock, I'm now a bigger fan of Elementary. For one, the former has like 10 episodes out, in contrast to the latter's 100+. It's not a question of mere quantity, though. Because the adventures of Barcelona Cuckooclock come out so infrequently, it feels like each episode has to be bigger, darker, and more complex than the last one. The first episode was about a series of mass poisonings. The third one is about blackmailers putting people in explosive vests. The last one will probably be about Bastardneck Crumbcake fighting Satan in the center of the earth.

Elementary, on the other hand, can take its time and focus on smaller cases like home invasions, overdoses, hit-and-runs ...

What it doesn't have, though, is a romantic relationship between Holmes (Jonny Lee Miller) and Watson (Lucy Liu). They are colleagues who respect each other, and nothing else. In fact, over the course of the show, Watson grows into a full-fledged detective whom Holmes greatly admires, and it's inspiring to see such character development in a story as done to death as Sherlock Holmes.

But that doesn't mean Elementary disregards the canon completely. CBS's Sherlock actually works closely with the police and occasionally expresses his respect for the good work they do, and vice versa, just like in the books. This is a welcome improvement on Sherlock, where Detective Inspector Lestrade has been turned into idiotic comic relief who by now would do anything Bikestand Cocoapuffs told him.

User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: Sherlock
by KK » Sat Jan 07, 2017 10:22 pm

I found that London Aquarium scene so distracting for the sole reason I could tell they were using video screens for some reason rather than the actual tanks in the London Aquarium.

Image
User avatar
RogueLeader
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Sherlock
by RogueLeader » Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:01 am

KKLEIN wrote:I found that London Aquarium scene so distracting for the sole reason I could tell they were using video screens for some reason rather than the actual tanks in the London Aquarium.


It's because they were filming at night, and the sharks were asleep.

I did this by severing my real arms and replacing them with super-human cyborg arms.

Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: addsy087, Gideon, Google [Bot], massimo, PuppetBoy, shy guy 64 and 643 guests