So who "won" E3?

Anything to do with games at all.

CHOOSE

Nintendo, obviously.
90
77%
Sony, I guess.
10
9%
Microsoft, for some reason.
4
3%
EA, yo.
8
7%
Ubisoft - no, really.
2
2%
Valve, even though they didn't even bother turning up the strawberry floats
3
3%
 
Total votes: 117
User avatar
Christopher
Emeritus
Joined in 2008
Location: Cambridge

PostRe: So who "won" E3?
by Christopher » Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:36 pm

Good article on the current state of the big three after the conferences.
http://www.mcvuk.com/features/708/OPINION-E3-2010-analysis

Something Fishy

PostRe: So who "won" E3?
by Something Fishy » Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:45 pm

I lost interest when he used the phrase "xbot". No hope of an unbiased view when you read that.

User avatar
Christopher
Emeritus
Joined in 2008
Location: Cambridge

PostRe: So who "won" E3?
by Christopher » Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:58 pm

Something Fishy wrote:I lost interest when he used the phrase "xbot". No hope of an unbiased view when you read that.


I think that was a tongue in cheek remark to mock the PSN + announcement. MCV aren't going to be biased from my experience with them.

Something Fishy

PostRe: So who "won" E3?
by Something Fishy » Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:08 pm

suzzopher wrote:
Something Fishy wrote:I lost interest when he used the phrase "xbot". No hope of an unbiased view when you read that.


I think that was a tongue in cheek remark to mock the PSN + announcement. MCV aren't going to be biased from my experience with them.


it did surprise me. Perhaps so then.

As you say, they're not that way at all. They can't be really, serving the industry as they do.


Return to “Games”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DarkRula, ITSMILNER, more heat than light, poshrule_uk, Ste, Vermilion and 435 guests