BID0 wrote:Moggy wrote:Somebody Else's Problem wrote:Death's Head wrote:The article above did mention an interesting item though, about how you could buy something on the XBox at 30% discount and then use on the PS4 version with no revenue for Sony.
As a gamer, I couldn't give less of a strawberry float about Sony's revenues.
You kind of have to care a little bit, with no revenue there will be no games.
As we move into a digital only future, these issues need to be looked at with decent legislation. I can accept that a game bought on the Microsoft store will not be available on a Sony console. But the digital marketplaces need to be opened up to competition on each platform. I think they will eventually, it is going to be quite clear that MS or Sony have a monopoly if the only option to buy games is through the digital stores that they control.
You'd think if that was going to happen then Apple would have been hit by it by now. They'll claim it's a security risk or something being able to sideload content from different stores that aren't the official one.
As long as there are multiple consoles there isn't a monopoly.
Apple can control apps on iOS and Google Android because there are 2 options in phone OS to pick from thus it isn't a monopoly, same in consoles as long as there is Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo there is a consumer choice as to which console and ecosystem to buy and so no one is controlling the game industry.
as we go download only there will be more download code sales etc. like you see for Steam available which will also create competition (ish) within the ecosystem