Have recently got a DSLR because I enjoy taking photos but still really learning the basics. Had fun messing round with the panoramic settings on holiday in South America this year, and got a decent sunset in the Andes:
A llama at Machu Pichu grazing:
And here's a few photos I took at a bird park that came out quite well:
Bonus picture: Llamas posing for their photo
Hoping to really get into it next year and actually fully understand what the camera can do.
Poser wrote:Can you tell me how you got that moon shot, please?
Took the opportunity on a clear night (for London) last week. That's at 300mm, f/11 and 1/125, which is pretty much exactly what this guide says to use as a starting point. Even with a tripod it didn't come out as sharp as I'd like though. I might try again the next night or two since it's a full moon, depending on the weather.
Cheers for that, and the link. I've always fancied giving that a go. I have a (cheap) 300mm lens so I'll try it when we get a clear night.
Trouble is, it's bloody windy in Newcastle all the time at the moment Even if I weigh the tripod down and delay the shutter release, I get a bit of wobble.
Mr Yoshi wrote:The second is amazing! Where did you take these?
Thanks. I took these photos down by Ægisíða.
In Reykjavík, Iceland. I was actually surprised the stars and northern lights were as visible as they were considering all the lights around. I can't imagine what it might look like if I was somewhere out in the wild with no lights anywhere nearby.
Anyway, just got a new camera and lens (Olympus OM-D E-M1 & 12-40mm f2.8) so I may overload the thread quite soon with some test shots. Just gotta strawberry floating wait for this God-damn strawberry floating battery to strawberry floating finish charging.
Edit: Alright, some test shots. All straight out of the camera, and I uploaded the full-size jpegs so click through to my Flickr if you want to see the originals.
I love using the touch-screen to focus and take shots, like I did this one:
The manual focus ring on the lens I got with the camera is great. It turns really smoothly, and the viewfinder is big and sharp enough to manually focus with.
It's a pretty wide lens, which is something I haven't had a chance to play around with on my digital cameras until now.
This next one was shot hand-held for a 0.5 second exposure. I can see the in-built image stabilization coming in really handy in certain situations. It's really cold out so I was shaking, which explains what blur there is.
But enough gushing. The menu system is taking a while to get used to. I still don't know how to assign the function buttons to something other than the default. Also the menus are kind of a clusterfuck, or at least at this point they feel like that to me. The shutter-release button is a little too sensitive for me. I keep accidentally taking shots when I only intended to press it halfway, or I just brush it with my finger and it gets pressed halfway. Just a bit annoying. The included strap is pretty bad. I may simply use the one from my EOS 550D (or buy a higher quality custom one).
But overall I'm pretty damn happy with this camera (so far at least). I better be in the long run, too, because it cost kind of a lot of money.
Mr Yoshi wrote:The pics all look pretty good, and the depth of field is surprisingly nice for a Micro 4/3 camera.
Well, they are taken very close with the aperture wide open (f2.8). Even a phone camera can get some foreground/background seperation if the subject is close enough. The depth of field is certainly shallow enough for me, and if I want even less I can always get a Voigtlander f0.95.
Anyway, some more pictures. The first two are taken with an old 70-210mm Canon FD lens. So, equivalent to 140-420mm on a full frame camera... yikes!