TCRT 7: Episode 2 - Attack of The Chat

Stealth birthday thread request there Denny.

Bethlehemster wrote:Had a lovely day meeting friends and making plans for beers tomorrow.
My friends little girl sang happy birthday to me. It was adorable.

Worst 'I've blown my beans up someone' post ever

Bunni wrote:Stealth birthday thread request there Denny.

Nah. Not arsed about that. Just spreading the joy.

Happy birthday Denster

Cheers mate.

Hb

He is not showing up on the forum birthday list and so I refuse to believe it is actually his birthday.

So happy birthday to Oxx, akijones, PoptyPing and godpapa and BOOOOOOOOOO to the liar Denster.

More like Trixter amirite

It was yesterday

Partridge Iciclebubbles wrote:

pjbetman wrote:

KK wrote:Nick Knowles revealing the truth to millions on ITV...

"Around the outside of the earth is the Van Allen belt which is massively radioactive and the argument is you would have to build a spacecraft out of lead to protect the astronaut."

"What about the other questions? On their chests they wore the cameras which they took the photographs of the moon. In which was Kodak film; as you know there is no atmosphere on the moon. In direct sunlight it is something like 200 degrees yet Kodak film has an operating field of like 130 degrees...yet amazingly it all worked."

"Also the moon landing photographs! It appears to be lit from two sides. Can you explain that?"

"[Apollo 1 caught fire] because the Russians had already got into orbit and circulated the earth inside the Van Allen belt so the only way they could top it was to go to the moon and back. When they discovered they couldn't the only way to do it was to fake it."

He forgot the bit were they filmed themselves taking off from the moon...yet were still able to get the footage...that bit was fake clearly...who knows about the rest, but it seems dubious to me (at best)

They planned something that fooled the entire world but forgot that they couldn’t film themselves taking off?

If only there was a way to film something like that and somehow transmit it back to Earth....

So they broadcast the filming back to earth? Wouldn't that take some serious kit to do that, in 1969? That Lunar module hardly had enough space for the astronauts, it seems.

Look, I've got my doubts over the moon landings, and I know that most of the lighting effects and camera effects have been debunked, but for me they were never the reasons why I think it was dubious. The lunar module is the main one for me...I mean just look at it

pjbetman wrote:

Partridge Iciclebubbles wrote:

pjbetman wrote:

KK wrote:Nick Knowles revealing the truth to millions on ITV...

"Around the outside of the earth is the Van Allen belt which is massively radioactive and the argument is you would have to build a spacecraft out of lead to protect the astronaut."

"What about the other questions? On their chests they wore the cameras which they took the photographs of the moon. In which was Kodak film; as you know there is no atmosphere on the moon. In direct sunlight it is something like 200 degrees yet Kodak film has an operating field of like 130 degrees...yet amazingly it all worked."

"Also the moon landing photographs! It appears to be lit from two sides. Can you explain that?"

"[Apollo 1 caught fire] because the Russians had already got into orbit and circulated the earth inside the Van Allen belt so the only way they could top it was to go to the moon and back. When they discovered they couldn't the only way to do it was to fake it."

He forgot the bit were they filmed themselves taking off from the moon...yet were still able to get the footage...that bit was fake clearly...who knows about the rest, but it seems dubious to me (at best)

They planned something that fooled the entire world but forgot that they couldn’t film themselves taking off?

If only there was a way to film something like that and somehow transmit it back to Earth....

So they broadcast the filming back to earth? Wouldn't that take some serious kit to do that, in 1969? That Lunar module hardly had enough space for the astronauts, it seems.

Look, I've got my doubts over the moon landings, and I know that most of the lighting effects and camera effects have been debunked, but for me they were never the reasons why I think it was dubious. The lunar module is the main one for me...I mean just look at it

Did you think they claimed to bring all the footage back on VHS tape?

pjbetman wrote:So they broadcast the filming back to earth? Wouldn't that take some serious kit to do that, in 1969? That Lunar module hardly had enough space for the astronauts, it seems.

Look, I've got my doubts over the moon landings, and I know that most of the lighting effects and camera effects have been debunked, but for me they were never the reasons why I think it was dubious. The lunar module is the main one for me...I mean just look at it

You think they could land on the moon but they couldn't transmit a brief video over a radio link?

What's wrong with the lunar module? Surely it would actually be more suspicious if it looked really cool, like it would if they had designed it for a movie? The reason it looks weird is that it was designed purely for functionality. There isn't a single compartment which isn't necessary for getting astronauts to and from the moon's surface. Check it out, the truth is way more interesting than a conspiracy:

EDIT: The top answer here on this Space StackExchange question explains the actual process of video transmission. I didn't know exactly how they did it before now either -- turns out the main kind of rocket bit (the command module) acted as a relay for the lunar module, and the transmissions were picked up by various tracking stations all over the world (depending on where the moon was relative to the Earth's rotation), and they even had to use a custom video format because of technological limitations -- that's pretty cool and interesting, and a much more satisfying explanation than "oh it was faked" surely.

Doesn't post for months then suddenly appears to quash the truth.

Dontbelievehislies.jpg

Albear wrote:Doesn't post for months then suddenly appears to quash the truth.

Dontbelievehislies.jpg

Few beers tonight with friends and then I'm off to London in the morning.
Got best seats in the house for Carmen at the Royal Opera House tomorrow night.

Going to be glorious.

Yeah Karl, just where were you on the night of the so called moon landings?

Bethlehemster wrote:It was yesterday

Happy birthday for yesterday big boy.

Cheers mate

I'm standing in line to meet Santa.

Like a boss!