Page 4 of 8

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:23 pm
by Delusibeta
Rik wrote:It was stated that the PC could "outperform" the console version for £119, it would be the case at 720p and a solid 30fps.

Reading the Digital Foundary article, it seems that the target is a solid 24FPS at minimums at 1024x768.

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:23 pm
by HM
Rik wrote:It was stated that the PC could "outperform" the console version for £119, it would be the case at 720p and a solid 30fps.


Link to this please? :simper: :simper: :simper: :simper:

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:23 pm
by Rik
Falsey wrote:To get an xbox with the bits I needed to play it about 6 months after launch cost me £279.99


That was the launch price for the 20gb system, the Arcade version was £219.99

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:24 pm
by jiggles
Joer wrote:EDIT: I'm not sure what my point is there. I think it's a "Why can't we all just get along" post. I'm not too sure.


I don't even think everyone should get along.

I just wish people would stop responding to inane gooseberry fool with more gooseberry fool. It just piles so much shitty gooseberry fool on the gooseberry fool pile that I can't even gooseberry fool without shitting all over some shitting gooseberry fool.

The behaviour today has been embarrassing. Not in equal measure (Rik :lol: ), but there's no high ground for anyone in this mess.

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:24 pm
by Delusibeta
Rik wrote:
Falsey wrote:To get an xbox with the bits I needed to play it about 6 months after launch cost me £279.99


That was the launch price for the 20gb system, the Arcade version was £219.99

Which had no hard drive and so required a memory card, which probably was another £20 on top, and rapidly became unusable as the updates and DLC rolled in.

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:24 pm
by Joer
Didn't the arcade version come without a hard drive or a memory card though? I'm probably wrong and I don't care enough to check if that was the case.

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:25 pm
by False
Delusibeta wrote:
Rik wrote:It was stated that the PC could "outperform" the console version for £119, it would be the case at 720p and a solid 30fps.

Reading the Digital Foundary article, it seems that the target is a solid 24FPS at minimums at 1024x768.


Give me the readies, I reckon I can totally do this challenge. I reckon Ive got the skills.

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:25 pm
by Rik
Delusibeta wrote:
Rik wrote:It was stated that the PC could "outperform" the console version for £119, it would be the case at 720p and a solid 30fps.

Reading the Digital Foundary article, it seems that the target is a solid 24FPS at minimums at 1024x768.


Lets see if what we build can do that.

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:26 pm
by Mockmaster
We're all one big happy family.

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:27 pm
by Rik
Delusibeta wrote:
Rik wrote:
Falsey wrote:To get an xbox with the bits I needed to play it about 6 months after launch cost me £279.99


That was the launch price for the 20gb system, the Arcade version was £219.99

Which had no hard drive and so required a memory card, which probably was another £20 on top, and rapidly became unusable as the updates and DLC rolled in.


Your changing the goalposts now :lol: We're now going back to launch prices instead of todays price, the arcade 360 could play Crysis 3 though out of the box, you could use your one months free Gold to save onto Cloud saves :slol:

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:28 pm
by Dangerblade
I'm more interesting in finding out the price of the cheapest PC that can play Pong.

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:28 pm
by Donk
jiggles wrote:
Joer wrote:EDIT: I'm not sure what my point is there. I think it's a "Why can't we all just get along" post. I'm not too sure.


I don't even think everyone should get along.

I just wish people would stop responding to inane gooseberry fool with more gooseberry fool. It just piles so much shitty gooseberry fool on the gooseberry fool pile that I can't even gooseberry fool without shitting all over some shitting gooseberry fool.

The behaviour today has been embarrassing. Not in equal measure (Rik :lol: ), but there's no high ground for anyone in this mess.


Surely there's a high ground for those with facts against those trolling?

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:29 pm
by Delusibeta
Rik wrote:
Delusibeta wrote:
Rik wrote:
Falsey wrote:To get an xbox with the bits I needed to play it about 6 months after launch cost me £279.99


That was the launch price for the 20gb system, the Arcade version was £219.99

Which had no hard drive and so required a memory card, which probably was another £20 on top, and rapidly became unusable as the updates and DLC rolled in.


Your changing the goalposts now :lol: We're now going back to launch prices instead of todays price, the arcade 360 could play Crysis 3 though out of the box, you could use your one months free Gold to save onto Cloud saves :slol:

Now you're really strawberry floating stretching.

(More to the point, can the Arcade update to the latest version of the dashboard? I don't think so, I think that some hard drive space would be required.)

(Plus the saves would require an infinitely long Gold subscription, and suddenly Falsey's build becomes cheaper)

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:30 pm
by Rik
jiggles wrote:
Joer wrote:EDIT: I'm not sure what my point is there. I think it's a "Why can't we all just get along" post. I'm not too sure.


I don't even think everyone should get along.

I just wish people would stop responding to inane gooseberry fool with more gooseberry fool. It just piles so much shitty gooseberry fool on the gooseberry fool pile that I can't even gooseberry fool without shitting all over some shitting gooseberry fool.

The behaviour today has been embarrassing. Not in equal measure (Rik :lol: ), but there's no high ground for anyone in this mess.


It's a simple challenge, nothing bad about it. It can either be done or it can't. If it can then it would be worth the investment to me.

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:32 pm
by Joer
So based on that eBay link that Delusi posted, it would be cheaper to to kit yourself out with a PC to play Crysis 3 multiplayer for more than a month by about £25 compared to getting it on 360? That's quite ridiculous how good the value is there. :lol:

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:36 pm
by Delusibeta
Joer wrote:So based on that eBay link that Delusi posted, it would be cheaper to to kit yourself out with a PC to play Crysis 3 multiplayer for more than a month by about £25 compared to getting it on 360? That's quite ridiculous how good the value is there. :lol:

I won't guarantee it'll run *well* but it'll probably run better than whatever RRoD'd piece of junk Rik has lined up for similar money.

(And yes, you can get PCs for less than a year of Gold. Not terribly good ones, but PCs nonetheless)

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:38 pm
by chalkitdown
Watching people argue with Rik...

Image

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:41 pm
by Pedz
Didn't we have this exact thread a few years back, and by the same people? Or can I now dream the future?

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:50 pm
by Lex-Man
Delusibeta wrote:
Rik wrote:
Falsey wrote:To get an xbox with the bits I needed to play it about 6 months after launch cost me £279.99


That was the launch price for the 20gb system, the Arcade version was £219.99

Which had no hard drive and so required a memory card, which probably was another £20 on top, and rapidly became unusable as the updates and DLC rolled in.


It also lacked a hdmi port.

Re: The £139 Gaming PC challenge thread.

Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:52 pm
by DaveDS
I think it might be possible at that price by taking a midrange AMD APU, and pairing it with the cheapest possible ram, motherboard, and case/PSU, keyboard/mouse combo's you could find. Why would anyone want to do that though?