The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Lagamorph
Member ♥
Joined in 2010

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Lagamorph » Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:07 am

Mafro » Sun Apr 20, 2014 1:31 am wrote:ITT: people forget about Blade.

Blade isn't as well known as a comic character as Spiderman and the X-Men though. When I've spoken to people about the Blade films they were surprised to learn they were based on comics rather than an original character created for the film.

Lagamorph's Underwater Photography Thread
Zellery wrote:Good post Lagamorph.
Turboman wrote:Lagomorph..... Is ..... Right
User avatar
Dual
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Dual » Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:57 am

Mafro » Sun Apr 20, 2014 1:31 am wrote:ITT: people forget about Blade.


who?

User avatar
No:1 Final Fantasy Fan
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: UK

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by No:1 Final Fantasy Fan » Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:20 pm

7/10
It was ok but not brilliant but I still enjoyed it though. I quite liked the twist at the end.

User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Denster » Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:38 pm

Thanks - i'll look out for that. :roll:

User avatar
Lagamorph
Member ♥
Joined in 2010

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Lagamorph » Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:17 pm

Post-Credit scene was [is]a bit pointless really. Was it literally just a clip from Days of Future past like it seemed to be?[/is]

Lagamorph's Underwater Photography Thread
Zellery wrote:Good post Lagamorph.
Turboman wrote:Lagomorph..... Is ..... Right
User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Denster » Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:19 pm

Oh so the spoiler hiding facility is working then?

User avatar
Irene Demova
Member
Joined in 2009
AKA: Karl

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Irene Demova » Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:30 pm

Lagamorph » Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:17 pm wrote:Post-Credit scene was [is]a bit pointless really. Was it literally just a clip from Days of Future past like it seemed to be?[/is]

Yeah
Mark Webb had to agree to include to be let out of some Fox contract

User avatar
Cosmo
Member
Joined in 2010

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Cosmo » Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:23 pm

Was there a twist? I really can't think of one.

User avatar
Lagamorph
Member ♥
Joined in 2010

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Lagamorph » Sun Apr 20, 2014 7:58 pm

Cosmo » Sun Apr 20, 2014 6:23 pm wrote:Was there a twist? I really can't think of one.

The twist was that [is]Peter Parker is Spiderman[/is]

Lagamorph's Underwater Photography Thread
Zellery wrote:Good post Lagamorph.
Turboman wrote:Lagomorph..... Is ..... Right
User avatar
Johnny Ryall
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Macraig
Location: Box Elder, MO

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Johnny Ryall » Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:01 pm

Buffalo » Sun Apr 20, 2014 3:05 am wrote:Crumbs, not this cat.


Your vernacular never ceases to amaze.

User avatar
Buffalo
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Buffalo » Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:09 pm

The English language is my play thing, Ryall my man 8-)

Image
User avatar
Joer
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Joer » Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:49 pm

Just got back from seeing this. Seemed like as the film was about to start, it ended which is a shame. Was pretty good either way, better than the first, but not as good as Capt 2. I also had no idea that was Paul Giamatti in the suit until right at the very end. :lol:

User avatar
JimKT
Member
Joined in 2012
AKA: Baron Zemo
Location: Keighley, UK

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by JimKT » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:15 pm

The cinema I went to go see this in had one of the WORST audiences ever. Too many kids! :fp:

Really enjoyed it. Did seem to drag on at times but was a solid 8/10 for me.

No one stayed after to see the post credits scene apart from me and the missus. No one seemed to realise Stan Lee was in the film either.

Can someone explain to me why people are complaining about too many villains. I thought it was a good mix, and to see Electro's story was great!

User avatar
Irene Demova
Member
Joined in 2009
AKA: Karl

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Irene Demova » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:18 pm

Cosmo » Sun Apr 20, 2014 6:23 pm wrote:Was there a twist? I really can't think of one.

There was one in Gwen's neck
Image

Skippy
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Skippy » Mon Apr 21, 2014 8:08 am

JimKT » Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:15 pm wrote:Can someone explain to me why people are complaining about too many villains.


After Spider-Man 3 everyone likes to panic whenever there's more than one

User avatar
HM
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by HM » Mon Apr 21, 2014 9:32 am

Yeah because that's it :roll: :roll:

Nothing to do with Dubstep Electro being a gooseberry fool villain that they want you to feel sorry for so the audience can "sympathise" with him as a anti-hero in the sinister six movie.

Nothing to do with Rhino being a ridiculous villain that they go and cast someone as good as paul giamatti in the role, only to have be borderline racist comedic accent russian.

Don't even get me started on how much of a waste norman osborn was, and how rushed harry's development was into green goblin just to fit the gwen's death story.

Igor wrote:HM is the man you should all strive to be.
User avatar
Irene Demova
Member
Joined in 2009
AKA: Karl

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Irene Demova » Mon Apr 21, 2014 10:21 am

If you're going to do the strawberry floating death of Gwen Stacy you really need to focus the entire story on goblin, you can have one more villain in the opening sure but outside of that there needs to be a solo focus.

Skippy
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Skippy » Mon Apr 21, 2014 11:31 am

HM » Mon Apr 21, 2014 9:32 am wrote:Yeah because that's it :roll: :roll:

Nothing to do with Dubstep Electro being a gooseberry fool villain that they want you to feel sorry for so the audience can "sympathise" with him as a anti-hero in the sinister six movie.

Nothing to do with Rhino being a ridiculous villain that they go and cast someone as good as paul giamatti in the role, only to have be borderline racist comedic accent russian.

Don't even get me started on how much of a waste norman osborn was, and how rushed harry's development was into green goblin just to fit the gwen's death story.


Yes, but then the problem isn't there's too many villains, it's that they handled them poorly. Films do multiple villains well all the time

User avatar
Nibble
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Big Tuna

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Nibble » Mon Apr 21, 2014 12:33 pm

Orci and Kurtzman are a pox on cinema.

User avatar
Memento Mori
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Emperor Mori

PostRe: The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - First Trailer
by Memento Mori » Mon Apr 21, 2014 12:41 pm

Skippy » Mon Apr 21, 2014 11:31 am wrote:
HM » Mon Apr 21, 2014 9:32 am wrote:Yeah because that's it :roll: :roll:

Nothing to do with Dubstep Electro being a gooseberry fool villain that they want you to feel sorry for so the audience can "sympathise" with him as a anti-hero in the sinister six movie.

Nothing to do with Rhino being a ridiculous villain that they go and cast someone as good as paul giamatti in the role, only to have be borderline racist comedic accent russian.

Don't even get me started on how much of a waste norman osborn was, and how rushed harry's development was into green goblin just to fit the gwen's death story.


Yes, but then the problem isn't there's too many villains, it's that they handled them poorly. Films do multiple villains well all the time


The more characters, the less likely they all get adequate character development and convincing motivations. It's a 90 minute film, not a thirteen episode tv show.


Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BTB, Dowbocop, Gideon, Grumpy David, Met, Neo Cortex, Vermilion, Zilnad and 559 guests