The Comments Thread

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Rocsteady
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Rocsteady » Thu Dec 08, 2016 1:34 am

Rocsleddy wrote:To be honest my first thought with regard to the birth canal story was the same - does it not take a very large amount of time for a statistically significant amount of evolutionary change to take place?

I assume I'm wrong with this? Genuinely curious.

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Thu Dec 08, 2016 8:56 am

Rocsleddy wrote:
Rocsleddy wrote:To be honest my first thought with regard to the birth canal story was the same - does it not take a very large amount of time for a statistically significant amount of evolutionary change to take place?

I assume I'm wrong with this? Genuinely curious.


Well the comments I posted don’t really fit with what you are saying there. The comments were all anti-evolution or anti-immigration (is there anything they can’t link to immagrunts?) or amusing.

I am no expert on evolutionary theory, but I think you are right to say that we can’t really judge if a significant evolutionary change has taken place, but I don’t think the scientists were saying that. Their hypothesis was that caesarean births are contributing towards the future evolution of humanity as babies and mothers that would have died are now surviving and passing on their genes. So while humanity as a whole hasn’t yet evolved into a species with a smaller pelvis, in the future the trend may move towards that as those genes are passed on.

User avatar
Rocsteady
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Rocsteady » Thu Dec 08, 2016 9:35 am

Reading back over them that is true. Think I conflated one of the comments claiming women with small birth canals would have died off by now with my thought that, to me as someone with only a cursory knowledge of the topic, that this story would be an unlikely occurence.

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Thu Dec 08, 2016 9:46 am

Rocsleddy wrote:Reading back over them that is true. Think I conflated one of the comments claiming women with small birth canals would have died off by now with my thought that, to me as someone with only a cursory knowledge of the topic, that this story would be an unlikely occurence.


I am not sure it is an unlikely occurrence, it would make sense (to me!) that as more and more women and children are saved by caesarean that (in the cases of a small pelvis) those genes will be passed on and spread amongst humanity. Of course we cannot say that for definite at the moment but it would seem to make sense that it would happen.

Having said that there are many reasons for the use of a caesarean that have nothing at all to do with the size of a woman’s pelvis. My own son was born by caesarean but that was to do with the placenta falling away too early and nothing to do with genetics. Not all of the extra caesarean births are going to impact on childbirth in human evolution.

Either way, it’s nothing to do with God’s perfect plan for us all. ;)

User avatar
Oblomov Boblomov
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mind Crime, SSBM_God

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Oblomov Boblomov » Thu Dec 08, 2016 9:58 pm

Have to admit, I'll be gutted if women with large pelvises die out :(.

Image
User avatar
Dowbocop
Member ♥
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Dowbocop » Fri Dec 09, 2016 7:21 am

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:Have to admit, I'll be gutted if women with large pelvises die out :(.

If they do the rocking world will no longer go round. Cataclysmic if true.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Thu Dec 15, 2016 12:49 pm

Felicity Jones says female action heroes are now "the norm"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-38313369

I demand that 50% of all film leads are women. That 10% are Muslim and that 8% are black.

So that means more white people and less women on Doctor Who BBC.


It is of course great that most of the top action heroes, soldiers and leaders in films are now women, gay, black or jewish. As a white man (yes, sorry) I accept the communal punishment of mock plastic foolish baddies we must become, for the sake of the new society.

But do women have to gloat so much, I wonder?

I mean, you are winning hands down, chill.


It's bad enough watching a 6ft man full of muscle smash his way through 6 large male opponents, without a scratch, but Hollywood's propaganda machine would have us believe a 5ft 4, 8 stone woman is also capable of such feats.

This is just part of the ongoing attack on men, masculinity, gender identity and reality!


Well yes, it is the 21st century.
Meanwhile how are things for women inside one of our "closest allies" - 8th century Saudi Arabia?


Obviously caused by Brexit BBC, you blame everything else on it !


Where is the push for the same number of female garbage collectors?
Coal miners? Septic tank installers?

Oh that's right, equality is only about the nice, exciting, safe jobs right? Until the day comes where we're forced to watch diversity and equality virtue-signalling movies, crap films like Rogue One and Female Ghostbusters will always tank at the box office.


BAFTA decides that if no LGBGT or insufficient diversity in a film it will not be lauded in future years.

All hail to the shrine of victimhood!

Who needs actual talent eh when we can celebrate diversity!

Me thinks the luvvie metropolitan tripe eaters have taken a tad to much tripe this time, don't you just hate being told what talent is when you can easily make up your own mind.


History shows there hasn't been many female action heros because men fight in wars etc.

So they have to delete all male characters from previous fantasy franchises and replace with females, Mad max, Ghost Busters and now Star Wars (both films). This has all been done to create a fake reality that we all the same. Trying sending 100000 women instead of men to next war and see what happens.....


"Where has this massive victim complex come from."

Maybe from the fact that men are the top of the stats for:

Suicide
Assault victims
Murder victims
Prison population
Homelessness
Low life expectancy

Is that enough or d'ya need more PROVEABLE FACTS to crack through your daze of ignorance?


I am deeply sorry I am a white, British male.

There, is that what you wanted to hear?


Looks like I have no chance of a film career.

I'm a white, anglo-saxon, heterosexual male. Spelt P-A-R-I-A-H.


Mrs Merkel plays the role as a super villain against Christain Europe...


Why is it that Sigourney Weaver could lead a sci-fi franchise across three decades and we could just enjoy the films without having to celebrate womanhood in all its glorious superiority?

In the same vein how is that we had the likes of black actor Sidney Poitier leading films in the 1960's without a #blacklivesmatter campaign?


From emeline pankhurst handing out white feathers to shame men into fighting in ww1 onwards, the women's movement has been happy to see men continue to die & still see men in "male" roles of soldier, policeman, trawlerman, miner etc. Men are happy for women to do these roles, It's just the vast majority of women won't do them. It's as sexist as saying women should be in the kitchen & having babies


Have you noticed how feminists (male and female alike) want women in science and academia, but not jobs and careers that involve danger, death, actual hard labour? Like mining,construction, working in the gas fields, working underwater, serving on the front line, etc. Hmm, I wonder why....


All we need now is a non-white, non-English, woman to be the main villain in a film and the world will be truly equal!


You want to know why Donald Trump won?

This. This is why Donald Trump won.

User avatar
Mini E
Doctor
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Mini E » Sun Dec 18, 2016 2:47 am

Rocking Around the Mini E wrote:
COUNCIL TO DISCUSS PLANS TO WELCOME SYRIAN REFUGEES
Syrian refugees could be housed on the Isle of Wight whilst their asylum applications are considered, if plans by the Isle of Wight Council go ahead.


http://www.islandecho.co.uk/news/counci ... n-refugees

Just to clarify - they are moving five families to the Isle of Wight. Five.

Scott Gulliver Don't welcome them! Worse thing you'll every do! Muppets
Like · Reply · 20 · 16 hrs


Shianne Rose Hodges Im moving then if they bring them over
Like · Reply · 5 · 16 hrs


Laura Willcox Our soldiers fought for our country to keep it British and keep us safe does that not mean anything to our 'British' people anymore


Ben Goddin U watch the crime rate will go through the roof especially sex crimes these people are animals


Hollie Dolly we all have our own problems, our lives aren't rosey it's hard enough as it is to survive without all this...


Jim Simms Spot on David Crawford. Would they be seeking "refuge" in the UK if we didn't give them benefits galore and houses!
Seek your refuge in the nearest safe country if you're a refugee!!


Natasha West Jaimie no one says it is there fault...neither is it the islands or anyone that lives here..or in the UK, so why should we all take responsibility for something forced upon us? Everybody knows the refugees could have been made very welcome in many adjacent countries, but NO Cameron has to be a hero & say we will take them! Well no we won't, our Island services are disgusting short staffed into almost non existent..refugees will need these services in order to live here, if there isn't enough now then there won't be tomorrow, what I'm saying is THE ISLAND cannot afford to take in people in such desperate need for these services...


Lee Cotton Doesn't surprise me!!!strawberry floating useless pricks!


Rosie Savage No sorry you have your own country live there


Julia Nash Really! not enough houses to go round already, without bringing any more people here, I wouldn't mind but most of them are men looking to rob and pilage.


Joe Jd Mckee They are not refugees they are migrants.


Naomi Lordan I love the way some people are pissed off with others not wanting them here, I'm not against anyone and totally understand why they would want to run away but why are the men not staying in their country and fighting for it??? I'm pretty sure all the men in world war 1 &2 did not want to fight but they did so for their country! Isn't that how it should be.?? I personally cant see that helping a few would matter but unfortunately as written more would definitely follow (alot). I have alot of family on te mainland and one is a teacher, not far short of 40% of the sch is foreign which is not a problem apart from the fact they talk no english what so ever, I'm sure that will not help our children if all the attention and effort is working with children that font understand. Feel sorry for them all but my family and their future life is priority so the less the better


Rosie Savage It's all there own fault though if you do your homework it's civil war therefore they are messing it all up for themselves


Matthew Eyeball Hull Great less jobs for islanders


June Brett Well council will be sorry. There are not enough houses now Why should we keep them.Should send then all back to there own country.


Wayne Staff we don't want them on our island.


Naomi Lordan Maybe the refugees had more guts back then! If they are so great why do they not fight for their country mat?


Patrick Murray You wait until the church in Newport becomes a mosque,then support them run away cowards!!


Blakey Thomas i cant belive all this nasty hatered is all for 5 familys! you talk about houseing, not one of ya mentioned second home owners, the nhs is f****ed cos its being run down and sold, its not the refugees buying up the nhs its the second home owners! share holders. if ya want get angry get angry with the people who make you and your familys suffer, and have some compashion for gods sake.


Martin Coombes The problem needs to be addressed at Source!!!!! David Cameron said months ago but got shot down by all the flipping lefties this country has which has now seen Europe being invaded by Isis under stealth


Duane Sibbick Tell them all to fuckoff,


Jessica Fiona Brown House your bloody own first !!! I'm sorry there country's wouldn't help us simple they are runny away from
Somewhere people are trying to sort out we didn't run away when the wars were on did we no when London and places where being smashed to bits they know life will be easy here yes we should help with more aid ect but don't send them to somewhere that's got high unemployment and can't even house there own people this is asking for problems there is enough racist views here as it is


Tony Flux strawberry float them Syrian banana splits off don't need them piss stains banana splits


Jamie Stone Not our problem


Edmond Brown I heard that two going to move the french camp to cows


Clinton Sard They can bugger off back home to where there from


Pete Bradbury strawberry float right off


Pamela Mitchell I hope they don't spoil the island by letting in these people,I am sorry but they don't live the same way as we do and have no respect for what is beautiful


David Cleasby Great, low crime rate out the window, even harder for our youngsters to find work and housing. The island is over populated all ready so god knows what it will be like if this happens.


Naomi Lordan Maybe the refugees had more guts back then! If they are so great why do they not fight for their country mat?


Roger Lane We dont want them ,we have enough families that need housing , Sorry send them back to there own country


Jamie Park strawberry float rite off with that gooseberry fool


Lenard Shilcock You seem to be intent on turning the Isle of Wight into another Calais. What the hell is wrong with you?


Tina Brown I have a mainland family.next to me. No respect for the neighbourhood. Flytipping and haven't cut the grass in months. . Spectrum Housing association useless rude and very unhelpful. Hope they don't house them. The other association south.wight much more professional.




I would just like to add to this now things have gone downhill in Aleppo. Using the same Facebook group (Spotted, Isle of Wight), these same commenters have descended on other submitted posts about abandoned cars, vehicles without MOTs etc...

Katharine Beckingham Yes it's wrong, yes they shouldn't be there, but really there are bigger issues out there! Innocents in Aleppo being bombed to smithereens, people not knowing how they're going to put a meal on the table for their kids, kids dying of cancer ... I could go on but I suspect you get the idea! Report it if you wish, but I shall not be letting myself get bothered by things that in the grand scheme of things means jack!


Sarah Marriott Meanwhile, in Aleppo.....


:|

User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Squinty » Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:53 am

These people really are deluded, selfish scum.

User avatar
Snowcannon
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Snowcannon » Thu Dec 29, 2016 12:39 pm

Dave Lee summarises the top memes and viral videos of 2016

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-38 ... _126030119

best 2 laughs were the bbc losing the EU ref vote and the USA election, and it wasnt even fake news either.


Many would say the funniest thing of the year was the number of Remainers
stating that they didn't bother to vote as the polls said they were going to win anyway.


"The top memes and viral videos of 2016" (unless its about Brexit)

Back in the real world...2016 was a highly significant year. A year that may well have brought about the end of post cold war Liberalism. An orthodoxy that directly caused the outcomes it was actually seeking to prevent. Good Riddance !

It was also the year of Trump, Farage & Leicester City.

It was the year of the underdog


The mindless stupidity of people in BBC comments is breathtaking...they can't help themselves can they, it's a technology story ffs :lol:

User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by KK » Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:31 am

BBC News wrote:UK household debt now a record £13,000, says TUC

Image

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38534238

Colski wrote:I see the BBC have as usual, posted a picture of the "average household" with this article.

What a bunch of pro-left, pro-liberal, anti-white bigots the BBC are.

BBC = Fake News.

ashgreener wrote:We see a picture of a family sitting in an affluent looking dining room (plus a large iPad on the table), decorative plates on the wall, expensive looking wall radiator, and then they say each household has a debt of £13,000, excluding mortgage.
We started with a folding kitchen table & two cheap chairs.
If you don't have the money, don't buy it.

Talk about reading too much into a stock photo...

Image
User avatar
Preezy
Skeletor
Joined in 2009
Location: SES Hammer of Vigilance

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Preezy » Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:04 pm

The iPad's got a crack in it so they've clearly stolen it and are eating their breakfast in the house of their victims. Dead family just off to the right, out of the picture.

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Tomous » Sun Jan 08, 2017 1:07 pm

That wall radiator does look expensive to be fair.

Image
User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by KK » Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:56 pm

BBC iPlayer to be 're-invented' by 2020

http://www.techradar.com/news/bbc-iplay ... ed-by-2020

Bob wrote:The dirty bbc are the scum of society targeting the poor and un-educated who don't realise that just because they own a tv they can live Legally Licence Free and they don't have to fund this horrible left winged biased company which spouts EU propaganda whilst not declaring they are being funded by the EU.

The best thing that could happen to the bbc is that the gullible members of the public finally see what the bbc is and what they stand for.

The bbc are only coming out with this absolute tripe now because they are losing money hand over fist as people realise they don't need or watch any bbc content either live or via iPlayer and they can be content with Netflix, Amazon and other alternatives.

All the bbc have to do is encrypt their channels and iPlayer and they would not need to hassle the public who have no need for the bbc and what it stands for. But they are scared stiff of this option as they know a huge number of people would not voluntarily subscribe so their annual £3.7 billion budget would be diminished.

Morrisons don't hassle me asking why I don't shop with them and send me threatening letters saying they are investigating my address and i could go to court, so why should a parasitic broadcaster like the bbc?

The dirty bbc was even pushing for a household tax to be included on every addresses council tax bill which thankfully hasn't happened. If it does I hope people refuse to pay it, even if there are riots on the streets and bbc places get trashed.


Bob...again wrote:The best solution to the parasitic bbc is NO CONTACT. Never contact them, give them your name. If you get a cold caller sent by TV Licensing / Capita / G4S do not confirm anything and close the door on them..

Bob's bitter. Bob doesn't get out much. Bob hates life. Don't be like Bob.

Image
User avatar
Errkal
Member
Joined in 2011
Location: Hastings
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Errkal » Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:59 pm

I bet bob is strawberry floating hilarious to watch in a pub when he has a proper British beer and starts ranting about the evil left.

User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by KK » Thu Jan 12, 2017 4:39 pm

OUTRAGE at BBC claims of SECOND Russian 'dirty dossier' on Trump amid claims they are trying to derail his presidency before it starts

http://www.dailyfail.co.uk/news/article ... tarts.html

Diogenese wrote:British Bolshevik Corporation.

KB wrote:The BBC is a national disgrace and I no longer trust their news coverage. It is laced with bias and innuendo and last night, they, just like Sky News, chose to show a few clips of Mr Trump's speech to make him look bad. Liberalism has gone crazy within our media and that of the US media and it has to stop. We should not tolerate the BBC of Sky News interfering in world politics when it is their job to give a balanced view and to remain totally unbiased.

Michael the un pc wrote:AT LAST... BBC BEING SEEN FOR WHAT IT IS A PURVEYOR OF FAKE NEWS AND LEFTWING BS. KEEP IT UP MR PRESIDENT AND IWHEN YOU COME TO LONDON IGNORE LBC THEYRE EVEN WORSE

KB...again wrote:BBC AND SKY NEWS ARE OUT OF CONTROL, LYING THROUGH THEIR TEETH TO US ABOUT TRUMP AND ABOUT BREXIT. SHUT THEM DOWN!

Mrs Agatha Marple wrote:I will boycott the disgraceful BBC from here on in. And I hope Trump sues them.

"Fake News", i.e. anything that doesn't chime with a certain political point of view & therefore needs to be easily written off, is going to be the buzzword of 2017.

It's the Daily Star/Sport on a mass scale & without the fun. Blowjob Vicky giving birth to a swan doesn't matter, this however does.

Image
KB
Member
Joined in 2012

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by KB » Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:29 pm

KKLEIN wrote:OUTRAGE at BBC claims of SECOND Russian 'dirty dossier' on Trump amid claims they are trying to derail his presidency before it starts

http://www.dailyfail.co.uk/news/article ... tarts.html

Diogenese wrote:British Bolshevik Corporation.

KB wrote:The BBC is a national disgrace and I no longer trust their news coverage. It is laced with bias and innuendo and last night, they, just like Sky News, chose to show a few clips of Mr Trump's speech to make him look bad. Liberalism has gone crazy within our media and that of the US media and it has to stop. We should not tolerate the BBC of Sky News interfering in world politics when it is their job to give a balanced view and to remain totally unbiased.

Michael the un pc wrote:AT LAST... BBC BEING SEEN FOR WHAT IT IS A PURVEYOR OF FAKE NEWS AND LEFTWING BS. KEEP IT UP MR PRESIDENT AND IWHEN YOU COME TO LONDON IGNORE LBC THEYRE EVEN WORSE

KB...again wrote:BBC AND SKY NEWS ARE OUT OF CONTROL, LYING THROUGH THEIR TEETH TO US ABOUT TRUMP AND ABOUT BREXIT. SHUT THEM DOWN!

Mrs Agatha Marple wrote:I will boycott the disgraceful BBC from here on in. And I hope Trump sues them.

"Fake News", i.e. anything that doesn't chime with a certain political point of view & therefore needs to be easily written off, is going to be the buzzword of 2017.

It's the Daily Star/Sport on a mass scale & without the fun. Blowjob Vicky giving birth to a swan doesn't matter, this however does.

I've not posted on here since July, I never wrote any of that stuff, haha. Da strawberry float?

User avatar
Kezzer
Member
Joined in 2012

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Kezzer » Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:45 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol:

This post is exempt from the No Context Thread.

Tomous wrote:Tell him to take his fake reality out of your virtual reality and strawberry float off


Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Errkal
Member
Joined in 2011
Location: Hastings
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Errkal » Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:57 pm

Hahaha brilliant.

User avatar
Mini E
Doctor
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Mini E » Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:37 pm

In addition to my previous post on the subject...

ALL New: Spotted Isle Of Wight
Simple yes or no , are you in favour of Syrian refugees coming to the island ?


I shall keep you all posted...


Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Balladeer, Benzin, Garth, Grumpy David, Little Old Man, Met, shy guy 64 and 313 guests