The Comments Thread

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Thu Feb 09, 2017 12:46 pm

Twitter unveils new anti-abuse tools.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-38897393

One person's abuse is another person's free speech. Where do we draw the dividing line? At which point does Trump sign an executive order to define what is allowed on Twitter?

People should be free to say what they want on the internet, but then (as with spoken, broadcast or written word) be subjected to legal proceedings if the law is broken.


As if Twitler wasn't bad enough already, I've seen someone get banned for calling someone a retard.

Liberals and their safe spaces are threatening Free Speech.


Twitter is just rubbish anyway, similar to Fake Book. Those seeking truth there will be sorely disappointed. If people can't take a bit of abusive banter they are best off avoiding it.
At the end of the day, it is just social engineering and mind control.


By anti abuse rules they mean censorship. Merkel already has the Tech companies agreeing to ban anyone who criticises her one million illegal immigrant invasion.


Social media is "social engineering"


"Mute tool" is the enemy of FREEDOM OF SPEECH


Unsavory trolls are a necessary evil to promote healthy debate

"Healthy debate" is the enemy OF THE CONTROLLERS



Wake up!


Facebook cracking down on any negative talk toward immigration calling it abuse.

Twitter cracking down on anyone who has a different point of few, we've already seen a large number of high profile right wing figures have their accounts banned, because they aren't going along with the liberal agenda.

dear oh dear.


Want to use Twitter to post some ISIS propaganda or child pornography? No problem. Want to report an account that's doing this? BANNED!

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:45 pm

Grammys and BAFTAs.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-38953862
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-38917463

Usual lefty clap trap from the champagne socialists..Stick to films stop imposing your views on us..


Ken Loach has been on the luvvie reserve for far too long, he doesn't even know where his roots were laid. The fog of priviledge gets to even the best of them.

Ken its yours and your ilks multiculti free for all that has bankrupted the west and brought about the cuts.

Doh!


Yeah, typical ... This nation has starving children and it seems to put more importance in its celebrities ... if it wasn't so damned sad, it'd be funny.


What a bunch of pompous hypocrites.

These are the people who will stoke a civil war because they believe everyone should live lives of debauchery, just like most of them.

They are so stuck in their own warped bubble that they are dangerous.

Quick, let me go and hide in my safe space...


Get up, get your award, say thank you, then sit down.
Narcissistic, bubble living liberals.


Liberal luvvies are now a self-parody. If only they knew it bless 'em.


BBC: "Adele swooped in and stole it from under (Beyonces) nose, making her very much the Donald Trump of pop."


Yet more divisive and racist narrative from the BBC, inferring that anybody white can't possibly possess talent but must have somehow cheated their way to their station in life instead.

Parallels then drawn to Hitler and Nazis by the swivel-eyed lefty loons.

Abhorrent.


People expected Beyonce to win not because she had the best album, but because she is black and had an album written for her about black issues add to that she's half of a famous couple... When you expect a music award to be handed out for a combination of political correctness & celebrity then it loses all integrity. It's good that she didn't win there were better albums by artists black & white.


The luvvies came out in force against The Donald and Brexit and where did that get them ?

So now they get to stand up and spout at their annual luvvie-fest and tell the world that we are all too stupid to understand and we all voted the wrong way.

The world works well for these people (that's why they don't want change), but it does not work for the majority of ordinary people.


I like the hypocrisy of the (American) liberal left:

The support women aborting babies, believing the unborn has no rights.

But, in acknowledging the unborn as people, they then turn around and cheer on Beyoncé's unborn twins... And, the sad meme saying "Sad that there are more black people in Beyoncé right now, than in Trumps entire cabinet team."


I seem to remember some of this lot saying they would be happy to ' shack - up ' immigrants with them in their mansion? Please let us know which of them has done so, I wish to send them a congratulatory letter

User avatar
Preezy
Skeletor
Joined in 2009
Location: SES Hammer of Vigilance

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Preezy » Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:49 pm

T_T

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:47 pm

The Bank of England is keeping the meaty £5 note.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38980352

Why people still believe in religion is beyond me.
__

Countless incidences of children with memories of past lives maybe?


''When in Rome ..............''.

This is the UK, when as a visiting foreigner or as an immigrant you are in the UK, you do not get to demand the UK to change to suit your beliefs anymore than we would expect your home country to change to suit our beliefs.


The minorities jumping up and down crying as usual!
The majority must do as we say, if they are so offensive to you don't use them, or is that too hard for you.


Apparently if you use shops /restaurants ran by a certain faith you will have more than just a little animal fat on your change,hygiene not very high on the agenda


Make them out of pork.


"What's next....the £5 Note is Racist"

Poor white people having £5 notes is racist. It's called white privilage. You have to be poor and white to be afflicted with white privilage mind. Rich white people recognise this and promote reparations from all white people...well the ones that pay taxes at any rate..to organisations that spend the money via rich white people.


PATHETIC,

when are these nutters going to GROW UP.

DO they breathe when they pass a farm ??


We can't adapt things to make everyone happy all of the time. Vegans are a very small group and we've adapted enough already to appease immigrants to this countries religious beliefs. I guess in this day and age all these groups expect to be able to say jump and the PC petrified government to say how high.


Here we go---people that are born and bred of all ethnic groups should accept that the majority, like a Brexit vote, have the sway and not pander to a minority
Like a previous corresponder, I'll have the notes if they don't want them.
Will we have to wear masks soon, after a burger so as not exhale beef contaminated breath.


I am a vegan. I was walking home when someone in leather boots accidentally stood on my foot. I was so disgusted that I moaned for six months. Join me at Trafalgar Square next week when I will be outing shoe cruelty by waving woolen slippers at people in leather footwear.

User avatar
TigaSefi
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by TigaSefi » Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:57 pm

The last one! :lol:

Image
1 > 2 > 3 >>>>>>> 4 >>>>> 5
User avatar
Rex Kramer
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Rex Kramer » Wed Feb 15, 2017 1:00 pm

I think the BBC comments section is providing a very useful public service. Imagine what these people would be like if they couldn't vent their pointless opinions, they'd be incandescent balls of rage the entire time. It's like a safety valve for idiots.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Thu Feb 16, 2017 12:45 pm

Attacks on judges undermine law.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38986228

does the Daily Mail still think Oswald Mosley is a decent chap ?


Well you can't blame 17,000,000 people for feeling a bit offish when 11 people get to potentially overturn their decision as they see fit


Ah didums. A few newspapers attacked the precious judicinary and the politicians did not jump to their defense.
This can undermine the law.
Meanwhile the BBC segregates and attacks a whole generation for voting leave and in perpetuating this ageist hatred and brexit divisions they threaten the cohesion of society, and they get taxpayers money to do it.
All media inspired hatred is wrong


Quite frankly they undermine themselves by being so thin skinned that they are not prepared to accept any critism...

at the end of the day if their role is to interpret the constitution and laws of the land, they cannot expect the public to simply lie down and die while the institutions are being used to undermine the principle of a democracy by a bunch of elites that can afford the lawyers


Post Brexit it's time to give the people what they want and do away with all the judiciary and parliament and appoint one Grand Chief Justice, Great Poobah, Patriotic and Heroic Victor of the People, Governor General, High Priest Field Marshall, Lord of the Privies and Scourge of all Foreigners Nigel Farage...

....no, it's what you really want....honest!


Judges and society need to be consistent.

When Parisians riot becuase a black man was rapped by a policeman's baton, or British ethnic minorities loot because Duggen with a gun was shot by the Police, then why is it indigenous British only sip their tea when watching the news that Somalians in Bristol rapped British Children?


This is why the judges have a poor reputation in that in court they are too busy discussing and examining the intricacies and technicalities of the law rather than dispensing justice for all the people


The offence of Treason should be once again used, along with the maximum penalty. There should be People's Courts to deal with traitors who deliberately subvert the will of the people, be they Judges, Politicians or so called celebrities.


All the PC snowflakes getting mad whenever someone doesn't unquestionably side with them, hardly surprising.

After all why would the fact that the basic function of law matter more than them getting their way?

When the snowflakes are so easily offended that the law itself offends them, I am not sure I should be laughing or crying.


ask the young girls in Rotherham, Stoke, Bradford if they think the law works.

User avatar
Trelliz
Doctor ♥
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Trelliz » Thu Feb 16, 2017 1:05 pm

Moggy wrote:
This is why the judges have a poor reputation in that in court they are too busy discussing and examining the intricacies and technicalities of the law rather than dispensing justice for all the people


Yeah, strawberry float those judges for actually understanding law, they should be spending their time implementing the...law.

The offence of Treason should be once again used, along with the maximum penalty. There should be People's Courts to deal with traitors who deliberately subvert the will of the people, be they Judges, Politicians or so called celebrities.


"I literally want arbitrary justice/fascism as long as "the will of the people" is what I agree with and I am never subjected to it."

Image

jawa2 wrote:Tl;dr Trelliz isn't a miserable git; he's right.
User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Squinty » Thu Feb 16, 2017 1:30 pm

The third from last comment is appallingly stupid.

I just don't know what to say in this thread anymore. It leaves me speechless at times.

User avatar
Oblomov Boblomov
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mind Crime, SSBM_God

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Oblomov Boblomov » Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:01 pm

I feel like my brain has been rapped.

Image
User avatar
Preezy
Skeletor
Joined in 2009
Location: SES Hammer of Vigilance

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Preezy » Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:02 pm

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:I feel like my brain has been rapped.

At least it wasn't raped.

User avatar
Oblomov Boblomov
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mind Crime, SSBM_God

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Oblomov Boblomov » Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:03 pm

Preezy wrote:
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:I feel like my brain has been rapped.

At least it wasn't raped.

You didn't read all of the comments, did you? :P

Image
User avatar
Preezy
Skeletor
Joined in 2009
Location: SES Hammer of Vigilance

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Preezy » Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:06 pm

Dammit.

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Hexx » Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:09 pm

You both deserved to be raped by a rapper.

User avatar
Gandalf
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Gandalf » Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:12 pm

Hexx wrote:You both deserved to be raped by a rapper.


Dblock?

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Mon Feb 20, 2017 12:40 pm

Blue Planet 2 has been announced with Sir David Attenborough as presenter.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39022239

I cannot bear to watch anything fronted by this Malthusian nutter who continues to propagate anthropogenic global warming myths. He is from the same Third World hating stable as eugenicist Paul Erlich and peddles the same nonsense.
He should have been arrested last year when he incited the assassination of the US president. Instead, he still has a cushy sinecure at the BBC.


It seems that fathers/males have once again been excluded from this series. When will the BBC start making documentaries about men's issues and male animals? 50% of the license payers are male. Yet they get less than 10% of the programming share. NOT FAIR. NOT EQUAL.


I used to really enjoy nature programmes but since the great global warming mantra had to become a crucial part of them, the politics have turned me off


TO SIR DAVID ATTENBOROUGH

Please do us all a favour and RETIRE. You are 90 years old and have hogged the limelight for decades and now is the time to give a younger person a chance. How many careers have you stifled by not letting go of the BBC's Natural History output? Once you die these natural history progammes will die too as did the SKY AT NIGHT when Patrick Moore died. Tragic.


Will the new series be call the Red Planet to fit in the BBC's left wing bias?


I'm sure it will be a superb watch. But I'll do it with sound off to avoid the wall to wall anti-industrial global warming propaganda.


What is interesting, is all the respect that David has rightfully earnt wide, & the 1 issue he correctly highlights that will bring humanity's extinction, OVERPOPULATION, & what are we all doing;:

MAKING OURSELVES EXTINCT !!!

ALL GOVERNMENTS PLANET WIDE R GUILTY OF 'CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY' 4 not highlighting the dangers of overpopulation 2 their people.
Until that changes, WE'RE ******

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Hexx » Mon Feb 20, 2017 12:42 pm

Re: Comment 2

Sorry - explain it to thicko here. Why is this a men's right issue?

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Mon Feb 20, 2017 12:48 pm

Hexx wrote:Re: Comment 2

Sorry - explain it to thicko here. Why is this a men's right issue?


Because feminists are ruining the world?

I have no idea, that's why I quoted the ridiculous comment.

User avatar
Victor Mildew
Member
Joined in 2009

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Victor Mildew » Mon Feb 20, 2017 12:55 pm

Jesus christ those Attenborough ones, I mean what the strawberry float? :dread:

Hexx wrote:Ad7 is older and balder than I thought.
User avatar
OrangeRKN
Community Sec.
Joined in 2015
Location: Reading, UK
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by OrangeRKN » Mon Feb 20, 2017 1:03 pm

I didn't think there existed people who disliked David Attenborough

Image
Image
orkn.uk - Top 5 Games of 2023 - SW-6533-2461-3235

Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BTB, Gideon, Google [Bot], Grumpy David, jimbojango, Joer, Met, Peter Crisp, Ploiper, Robbo-92, Rubix, TonyDA, wensleydale and 462 guests