GRcade

Knoyleo wrote:I had to Google that to find out who you meant.

Who the strawberry float calls James Bond, Jimmy B?

Missy wrote:Why should he apologise? Surely equal rights dictate that if he would have said it to a man then he should be able to say it to a woman! For goodness sake, stop the world, I want to get off!

Bridgie wrote:Why are sports reporters women. I turn them off, THEY SOUND LIKE DUCKS quaking.

Tom wrote:This is the problem in snowflake Britain, traditional meanings have been redefined to the point of meaningless. Football is an emotive sport, it is full of characters but the snowflakes want sanitise the sport as with everything else to the point of neutrality and boredom.

Givehimabreak wrote:Boo hoo. Equal rights at the BBC only when it suits them. Get over it girl. If you want to mix it with the boys, suck it up. Otherwise stick to reporting women's football.

Luke wrote:Her surname makes her sound like she should be appearing in adult films, not reporting for the BBC.

KK wrote:

Luke wrote:Her surname makes her sound like she should be appearing in adult films, not reporting for the BBC.

Dual wrote:THEY SOUND LIKE DUCKS

A liberal is someone who has not been blown up in a terrorist atrocity

What will Berners-Lee say after he's been blown up in a terrorist attack?
Oh, blast I was wrong about that?

Laughing at all the comments on here defending the right of absolute privacy.

Like anyone in M15 et al would be in the least bit bothered by your funny cats, baby nieces, wk end barbeque pictures and boring lives.

@5. JimH

I await the 'If you have nothing to hide, then it won't matter' idiots to turn up....

/

I bet your internet history is cleaned regularly, right? ... I haven't cleaned mine once, 'nothing to hide'!

We need to stop the terrorists from using encryption,
we need TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT AT
WHATEVER COST.
BECAUSE YOU CAN NOT BRING INNOCENTS BACK TO LIFE

What the hell does the everyday person on the street need to encrypt.
You Liberal minded fools, terrorists and Islam fundamentalists don't thank you for their freedom to pass their info freely.
Let's hear you say this when they slam a truck into you.

What you're arguing about here is for the freedom of not only terrorists to communicate secretly and freely but every criminal organisation on the planet, of which there are arguably far more.

A real no brainer, Berners lee always was overrated.

JUST because he's RICH it does NOT mean he should get to have his SAY....

OBVIOUSLY the UK and USA have their plans..........................

What's the NEED for this GUY to get INVOLVED????????

UpVoTe Me!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you!!!!!!!!!

Whatever Tim. What Tim really means is it's hateful when the net is utilised to break the left leaning, pro Islamic narrative, provided to us by the establishment media.

The leftist loonies should all gather and protest (how about a rally?). The loonies should pass on all information to all people, including the terrorists. After all they are God's creation too and their human rights need to be respected. (I can't say the same about their limbless victims though). The right wing should be abused for trying to protect the vulnerable and decent people.

Freedom is a privilege not a right.

Rocsteady wrote:The first one's the best, good to know there are 8 billion liberals on the planet.

Tomous wrote:

Rocsteady wrote:The first one's the best, good to know there are 8 billion liberals on the planet.

I can't actually work or what they're getting at

Rocsteady wrote:

Tomous wrote:

Rocsteady wrote:The first one's the best, good to know there are 8 billion liberals on the planet.

I can't actually work or what they're getting at

I think it's that you're only lenient with terrorists/criminals until one directly effects you.

Karl wrote:Even if you trust the government - which you shouldn't - if you break encryption via backdoors or a 'master key' then not only can the government can use those systems, but so can foreign governments or hacker groups. Encryption isn't just protecting your Facebook messages, it's protecting your banking passwords, your private photos, and your personal data in databases. People just don't understand that.

Karl wrote:Even if you trust the government - which you shouldn't - if you break encryption via backdoors or a 'master key' then not only can the government can use those systems, but so can foreign governments or hacker groups. Encryption isn't just protecting your Facebook messages, it's protecting your banking passwords, your private photos, and your personal data in databases. People just don't understand that.

Dual wrote:THEY SOUND LIKE DUCKS

Moggy wrote:

Karl wrote:Even if you trust the government - which you shouldn't - if you break encryption via backdoors or a 'master key' then not only can the government can use those systems, but so can foreign governments or hacker groups. Encryption isn't just protecting your Facebook messages, it's protecting your banking passwords, your private photos, and your personal data in databases. People just don't understand that.

As you have not been blown up in a terrorist atrocity, I can only assume you are a liberal and can therefore be ignored.

Squinty wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Karl wrote:Even if you trust the government - which you shouldn't - if you break encryption via backdoors or a 'master key' then not only can the government can use those systems, but so can foreign governments or hacker groups. Encryption isn't just protecting your Facebook messages, it's protecting your banking passwords, your private photos, and your personal data in databases. People just don't understand that.

As you have not been blown up in a terrorist atrocity, I can only assume you are a liberal and can therefore be ignored.

A Libertard Snowflake and probably a Remoaner.

A lot of people don't realise that when you pepper a response with name calling, it weakens you're position significantly.