Bunni wrote:Apologies, but I need to vent and don't have anywhere else to go.
My greatest fear has come true. One of the ladies at work was violently/sexually assaulted by a patient over the weekend. The response from management hasn't been great and it's cemented my decision to leave. I don't have a registration to risk losing, but I do have my sanity. I love helping patients, and thrive delivering care in tough situations. But this place is so dangerous. It's unsustainable to stay. I feel strawberry floating terrible for the lass. Everyone is strawberry floated up because of it.
There's a meeting with HR next month because of the results of the staff questionnaire sent out being less than favourable. The two main managers need sacked. Their incompetence and poor decision making have left staff vulnerable and we've had too many near misses covered up. I have an interview at the end of the month, and I think I'll accept whatever comes. If I've got somewhere to go, I'll feel confident in being vocal at the meeting without fear of repercussions. Which unfortunately seems to be an issue here with many support staff holding back for the sake of keeping their wages. It's a shite state of affairs and I want no part of it anymore. I've seen and been victim to plenty of attacks, but this one has really got to me, and I don't think these feelings will go away any time soon.
Christ Donna, if you need to chat you know where I am.
Drumstick wrote:Oblomov Boblomov wrote:Re back to work interviews, these are crucial IMO and are the most important aspect of sickness management. It does come down again to consistency and it provides the ability to crack down on a potential sickness absence issue from the very beginning and fully document the entire situation for future use if necessary. In your situation, it might seem unnecessary, however what's to say you won't develop a sickness problem in the future and how would other team members feel if you were left out of the management process just because you were considered reliable by your manager?
From my POV, back to work interviews are a waste of my time. They basically consist of three lines of interrogation:
1) What was wrong with you, how bad was it?
2) Are you OK now? Along with perhaps further questioning just to double check the employee isn't faking it
3) Will this be a problem in future?
I see them as companies choosing to actively demonstrate mistrust of their employees to not take advantage of stuff like sick pay. I do understand that it's important to document how often someone is sick in case you get someone with 10-20 different instances over 12 months but this "cracking down" type mentality companies have is nonsense considering that >99% of employees do not do this (at least in my experience).
There's also a feeling that managers aren't treated the same as those on the lower rungs of the corporate ladder in this regard. They very often pull the "work from home" card if they are unwell so that it doesn't go against their sick record thus circumventing the entire process and rendering it inherently unfair on those further down the food chain (and this comes from someone who has the option of working from home).
I agree with this in the main, but I think there's a case for back to work interviews particularly in the face of mental health absences. It's worth having a chat with the employee to see if anything can be done to help with workloads etc.