Brexit

Our best bits.

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

Remain a member of the European Union
222
80%
Leave the European Union
57
20%
 
Total votes: 279
User avatar
Grumpy David
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Cubeamania

PostRe: Brexit
by Grumpy David » Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:24 am

lex-man wrote:
Moggy wrote:Why do LBC allow this man to continue to lie and spread mistruths?

twitter.com/nigel_farage/status/888100975596232704



None of that appears in Article 50. :fp:


It's point 3 of article 50:

"The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period."

Although I don't think it means what Farage says it means.


Didn't the House of Lords conclude we've no legal liability/obligations once we leave?

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:29 am

Grumpy David wrote:Didn't the House of Lords conclude we've no legal liability/obligations once we leave?


I think it was a House of Lords committee rather than the whole of the House of Lords. And I am pretty sure they acknowledged that not paying our fair share of our commitments would mean we would end up with no trade deal.

User avatar
Lex-Man
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Brexit
by Lex-Man » Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:30 am

Moggy wrote:
lex-man wrote:
Moggy wrote:Why do LBC allow this man to continue to lie and spread mistruths?

twitter.com/nigel_farage/status/888100975596232704



None of that appears in Article 50. :fp:


It's point 3 of article 50:

"The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period."

Although I don't think it means what Farage says it means.


What you wrote there is not what is on the paper that Farage is holding up.

Article 50 in full:

1. Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.

2. A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention. In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council, acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.

3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.

4. For the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 3, the member of the European Council or of the Council representing the withdrawing Member State shall not participate in the discussions of the European Council or Council or in decisions concerning it.

A qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

5. If a State which has withdrawn from the Union asks to rejoin, its request shall be subject to the procedure referred to in Article 49.

http://www.lisbon-treaty.org/wcm/the-li ... le-50.html


Your right. Although that was the closest part. It's the addition of the word 'obligations' that really changes the meaning. It seems pretty poorly worded IMO. But it appears to just say that the treaties will stop applying from the date we leave, presumably to be taken over by some new treaty.

Amusement under late capitalism is the prolongation of work.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:33 am

lex-man wrote:Your right. Although that was the closest part. It's the addition of the word 'obligations' that really changes the meaning. It seems pretty poorly worded IMO. But it appears to just say that the treaties will stop applying from the date we leave, presumably to be taken over by some new treaty.


Farage's lie/misinformation there is to suggest that the UK will not have to pay any money at all to the EU on leaving. Which isn't what Article 50 says.

Obviously once we leave then the EU treaties will not apply to us. That doesn't mean we don't owe a lot of money to the EU in respect of projects and commitments that we are signed up for.

User avatar
BID0
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Essex

PostRe: Brexit
by BID0 » Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:39 am

Moggy wrote:
Grumpy David wrote:Didn't the House of Lords conclude we've no legal liability/obligations once we leave?


I think it was a House of Lords committee rather than the whole of the House of Lords. And I am pretty sure they acknowledged that not paying our fair share of our commitments would mean we would end up with no trade deal.

It'd probably be like not paying your mobile phone bill and cancelling you direct debits.

Sure you avoid a £100 or so in phone bills but good luck getting a mortgage or anything in the near future.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:47 am

BID0 wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Grumpy David wrote:Didn't the House of Lords conclude we've no legal liability/obligations once we leave?


I think it was a House of Lords committee rather than the whole of the House of Lords. And I am pretty sure they acknowledged that not paying our fair share of our commitments would mean we would end up with no trade deal.

It'd probably be like not paying your mobile phone bill and cancelling you direct debits.

Sure you avoid a £100 or so in phone bills but good luck getting a mortgage or anything in the near future.


It would be like ending a tenancy agreement and leaving without paying the water, gas, electric, council tax and phone bills. I mean, sure the tenancy agreement might say I can leave after a months notice, but it’s kind of expected that you settle all the bills you owe before you bugger off.

User avatar
DML
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by DML » Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:02 am

We can talk til the cows come home, psychoanalyse to death, but trust me, it can all be easily explained if you realise it was just an error to vote Leave. There's so much evidence at this point it's ridiculous.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:06 am

DML wrote:We can talk til the cows come home, psychoanalyse to death, but trust me, it can all be easily explained if you realise it was just an error to vote Leave. There's so much evidence at this point it's ridiculous.


Most of us realise it was a mistake to have voted leave. The only possible chance we have (and I don’t think we have much chance at all) of avoiding leaving the EU is by talking, explaining and trying to convince.

I don’t think it will do any good, the government seems fixed on hard Brexit, but it’s all we have. Unless we riot, I have never taken part in a riot so I might be tempted by that so I can cross it off my bucket list. ;)

User avatar
Lex-Man
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Brexit
by Lex-Man » Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:23 am

Moggy wrote:
DML wrote:We can talk til the cows come home, psychoanalyse to death, but trust me, it can all be easily explained if you realise it was just an error to vote Leave. There's so much evidence at this point it's ridiculous.


Most of us realise it was a mistake to have voted leave. The only possible chance we have (and I don’t think we have much chance at all) of avoiding leaving the EU is by talking, explaining and trying to convince.

I don’t think it will do any good, the government seems fixed on hard Brexit, but it’s all we have. Unless we riot, I have never taken part in a riot so I might be tempted by that so I can cross it off my bucket list. ;)


People seem to have excepted that we will leave. I think it would be hard to get enough people together for a proper riot.

Amusement under late capitalism is the prolongation of work.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Fri Jul 21, 2017 9:28 am

lex-man wrote:
Moggy wrote:
DML wrote:We can talk til the cows come home, psychoanalyse to death, but trust me, it can all be easily explained if you realise it was just an error to vote Leave. There's so much evidence at this point it's ridiculous.


Most of us realise it was a mistake to have voted leave. The only possible chance we have (and I don’t think we have much chance at all) of avoiding leaving the EU is by talking, explaining and trying to convince.

I don’t think it will do any good, the government seems fixed on hard Brexit, but it’s all we have. Unless we riot, I have never taken part in a riot so I might be tempted by that so I can cross it off my bucket list. ;)


People seem to have excepted that we will leave. I think it would be hard to get enough people together for a proper riot.


The riots of a few years ago proved all you have to do is link the riot to looting and people will turn up in droves for the chance of a new TV.

User avatar
Lex-Man
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Brexit
by Lex-Man » Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:09 am

Moggy wrote:
lex-man wrote:
Moggy wrote:
DML wrote:We can talk til the cows come home, psychoanalyse to death, but trust me, it can all be easily explained if you realise it was just an error to vote Leave. There's so much evidence at this point it's ridiculous.


Most of us realise it was a mistake to have voted leave. The only possible chance we have (and I don’t think we have much chance at all) of avoiding leaving the EU is by talking, explaining and trying to convince.

I don’t think it will do any good, the government seems fixed on hard Brexit, but it’s all we have. Unless we riot, I have never taken part in a riot so I might be tempted by that so I can cross it off my bucket list. ;)


People seem to have excepted that we will leave. I think it would be hard to get enough people together for a proper riot.


The riots of a few years ago proved all you have to do is link the riot to looting and people will turn up in droves for the chance of a new TV.


I'm not sure that'll stop brexit though.

Amusement under late capitalism is the prolongation of work.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:11 am

lex-man wrote:
Moggy wrote:
lex-man wrote:
Moggy wrote:
DML wrote:We can talk til the cows come home, psychoanalyse to death, but trust me, it can all be easily explained if you realise it was just an error to vote Leave. There's so much evidence at this point it's ridiculous.


Most of us realise it was a mistake to have voted leave. The only possible chance we have (and I don’t think we have much chance at all) of avoiding leaving the EU is by talking, explaining and trying to convince.

I don’t think it will do any good, the government seems fixed on hard Brexit, but it’s all we have. Unless we riot, I have never taken part in a riot so I might be tempted by that so I can cross it off my bucket list. ;)


People seem to have excepted that we will leave. I think it would be hard to get enough people together for a proper riot.


The riots of a few years ago proved all you have to do is link the riot to looting and people will turn up in droves for the chance of a new TV.


I'm not sure that'll stop brexit though.


I never said it would, I just want people to get free TVs.

User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Brexit
by Squinty » Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:20 am

Moggy is truly a man of the people.

Just like his brother, Jacob.

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Hexx » Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:25 am

Gove telling farm's they'll have to prove they deserve to keep subsidies post Brexit

Delicious serving of self inflicted harm. Shame it's delivered by that twunt.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:38 am

Squinty wrote:Moggy is truly a man of the people.

Just like his brother, Jacob.


Vir populous. 8-)

User avatar
That
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by That » Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:59 am

Moggy wrote:I never said it would, I just want people to get free TVs.


Looting one will be only way anyone can afford a new TV post-Brexit so we may as well start now.

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Fri Jul 21, 2017 11:07 am

Karl wrote:
Moggy wrote:I never said it would, I just want people to get free TVs.


Looting one will be only way anyone can afford a new TV post-Brexit so we may as well start now.


You'll have to start now, post Brexit nobody will be shipping TVs to Britain and so we will have to go without. Or buy British brands, but nobody is that silly.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Fri Jul 21, 2017 4:04 pm

LBC have now basically called Farage a liar. :lol:

Image

User avatar
Photek
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Dublin

PostRe: Brexit
by Photek » Fri Jul 21, 2017 5:07 pm


Image
User avatar
Garth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008
Location: Norn Iron

PostRe: Brexit
by Garth » Fri Jul 21, 2017 5:29 pm



Barclays and JP Morgan are eyeing Dublin too:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-40610573
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-39922640

Frankfurt appears to be another popular choice among banks.


Return to “Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 495 guests