Brexit

Our best bits.

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

Remain a member of the European Union
222
80%
Leave the European Union
57
20%
 
Total votes: 279
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:24 am

Rex Kramer wrote:It won't happen because the government wouldn't allow it to happen. They'd just lump on tax break after tax break to ensure they don't lose this industry. Problem then comes with who fills in the hole in the public purse (here's a hint, you and me).


That all depends on what EU nations do though. If there are high tariffs for financial dealings with the EU, tax cuts might help alleviate that. However that doesn't mean an EU nation will not also lower their tax charges.

I think Ireland already have very very low tax rates for businesses, if Dublin can offer low low tax, an English speaking population and tariff free trade then London and Paris might feel somewhat left out.

bear
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by bear » Sun Jul 16, 2017 11:35 am

The Mail's spelling of Frankfurt is appalling.


https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2017-brexit-bankers/?utm_content=brexit&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&cmpid%3D=socialflow-facebook-brexit



These companies were always going to have to expand their EU based operations after Brexit. The challenge for the UK will be in keeping the job losses to the bare minimum.

User avatar
Return_of_the_STAR
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Return_of_the_STAR » Sun Jul 16, 2017 12:01 pm

Lagamorph wrote:The government don't have much of a choice. If EU law is that Euro clearing must happen within the EU then there's nothing that the UK Government can do to stop them.

There were attempts to take EU clearing from London several years ago that the UK Government fought in European Court of Justice, and the ECJ only sided with the UK on the basis that it was illegal to discriminate against another EU member in that way. We're now losing that protection.


Indeed, i read about that a few weeks ago, i don't recall hearing about it at the time. For me that makes it obvious that we will lose Euro clearing.

Moggy wrote:
Rex Kramer wrote:It won't happen because the government wouldn't allow it to happen. They'd just lump on tax break after tax break to ensure they don't lose this industry. Problem then comes with who fills in the hole in the public purse (here's a hint, you and me).


That all depends on what EU nations do though. If there are high tariffs for financial dealings with the EU, tax cuts might help alleviate that. However that doesn't mean an EU nation will not also lower their tax charges.

I think Ireland already have very very low tax rates for businesses, if Dublin can offer low low tax, an English speaking population and tariff free trade then London and Paris might feel somewhat left out.


Yeah i think Dublin is of more of a threat to London.

bear wrote:The Mail's spelling of Frankfurt is appalling.


https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2017-brexit-bankers/?utm_content=brexit&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&cmpid%3D=socialflow-facebook-brexit

These companies were always going to have to expand their EU based operations after Brexit. The challenge for the UK will be in keeping the job losses to the bare minimum.


My hope is that essentially all these companies have to do is open a small subsidiary in an EU country to be able to retain their licences and thus keep the majority of their operations here. If that's the case then I think Dublin is the main beneficiary as long as the operations are small. If we are talking about big job moves then I don't believe that Ireland has the ability to attract that many due to it's low population and shortage of skilled people in these areas. Obviously though the companies would attempt to get some of their current employees to move there.

On another matter i read earlier how property prices are already driving certain companies out of london as their executive staff cant even afford to live there.

Shoe Army
User avatar
Photek
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Dublin

PostRe: Brexit
by Photek » Sun Jul 16, 2017 8:07 pm

Bit of a housing / accommodation problem in Dublin at mo, if we can sort that out within next 18 months then it could be a major coup for the financial industry.

Tech and pharma sewn up years ago so not quite sure what you mean by non skilled and even if that's true we welcome skilled folk to come here. We are also one of the youngest work forces in Europe.

Image
User avatar
Return_of_the_STAR
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Return_of_the_STAR » Sun Jul 16, 2017 8:30 pm

Photek wrote:Bit of a housing / accommodation problem in Dublin at mo, if we can sort that out within next 18 months then it could be a major coup for the financial industry.

Tech and pharma sewn up years ago so not quite sure what you mean by non skilled and even if that's true we welcome skilled folk to come here. We are also one of the youngest work forces in Europe.


Well what I mean is you can't just move tens of thousands of skilled banking jobs to a country with a small population like Ireland and expect them to have the workforce to match it. In the short term though it would be the case that employees from London would just move there with the jobs.

Shoe Army
User avatar
Rightey
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Rightey » Sun Jul 16, 2017 9:09 pm

Lagamorph wrote:The EU Charter of fundamental rights has gone in the repeal bill.

It contains the following protections,

The first title (Dignity) guarantees the right to life and prohibits torture, slavery, the death penalty, eugenic practices and human cloning. Its provisions are mostly based on the ECHR, although Article 1 closely reflects Article 1 of the German Basic Law.

The second title (Freedoms) covers liberty, personal integrity, privacy, protection of personal data, marriage, thought, religion, expression, assembly, education, work, property and asylum.

The third title (Equality) covers equality before the law, prohibition of all discrimination including on basis of disability, age and sexual orientation, cultural, religious and linguistic diversity, the rights of children and the elderly.

The fourth title (Solidarity) covers social and workers' rights including the right to fair working conditions, protection against unjustified dismissal, and access to health care, social and housing assistance.

The fifth title (Citizen's Rights) covers the rights of the EU citizens such as the right to vote in election to the European Parliament and to move freely within the EU. It also includes several administrative rights such as a right to good administration, to access documents and to petition the European Parliament.

The sixth title (Justice) covers justice issues such as the right to an effective remedy, a fair trial, to the presumption of innocence, the principle of legality, non-retrospectivity and double jeopardy.


So goodbye privacy, goodbye personal data protections, goodbye working conditions, goodbye equality


Now call me a skeptic, but I don't think the British government is planning on bringing back slavery. Isn't this just a case of these things are already covered in UK law so to avoid duplication they're getting rid of it here?

Or am I missing something and you are planning on bringing back slavery? :shifty:

Pelloki on ghosts wrote:Just start masturbating furiously. That'll make them go away.

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Sun Jul 16, 2017 9:21 pm

FFS Rightey, we call it "indentured servitude" not "slavery". :roll:

User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: Brexit
by KK » Mon Jul 17, 2017 10:19 pm

David Davis is as 'thick as mince' and as 'lazy as a toad', says Vote Leave chief

Dominic Cummings has admitted Brexit could turn out to be an ‘error’

The former head of the Vote Leave campaign has branded the Brexit Secretary as “thick as mince” and “as lazy as a toad”.

Dominic Cummings said David Davis’s Repeal Bill contained provisions that would allow ministers to cave in to EU demands at the last minute.

Mr Cummings’s outburst reflects continuing disagreement between different wings of the Brexit movement, which saw intense infighting at the time of last year’s EU referendum.

It comes on the same day that Mr Davis made a half-day trip to Brussels to negotiate with EU officials, where he faced criticism for being pictured sitting down for talks without any notes.

In the photograph, Mr Davis’s approach was in stark contrast to the European Commission negotiators, who sat with large piles of briefing papers in organised binders.

Responding to the “thick as mince” comment, Andy Wigmore, a figure associated with the rival Leave.EU faction, labelled Mr Cummings “Super Prat”.

Mr Cummings, who masterminded the claim that Brexit could fund the NHS to the tune of £350m a week, said earlier this month that there was a chance that leaving the EU would turn out to be an “error” following a decision by “morons” in Government to withdraw from the European atomic energy community, Euratom.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 45911.html

Well I'm still optimistic.

strawberry floating TROLL FACE.

Image
User avatar
Lex-Man
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Brexit
by Lex-Man » Mon Jul 17, 2017 11:08 pm

Rightey wrote:
Lagamorph wrote:The EU Charter of fundamental rights has gone in the repeal bill.

It contains the following protections,

The first title (Dignity) guarantees the right to life and prohibits torture, slavery, the death penalty, eugenic practices and human cloning. Its provisions are mostly based on the ECHR, although Article 1 closely reflects Article 1 of the German Basic Law.

The second title (Freedoms) covers liberty, personal integrity, privacy, protection of personal data, marriage, thought, religion, expression, assembly, education, work, property and asylum.

The third title (Equality) covers equality before the law, prohibition of all discrimination including on basis of disability, age and sexual orientation, cultural, religious and linguistic diversity, the rights of children and the elderly.

The fourth title (Solidarity) covers social and workers' rights including the right to fair working conditions, protection against unjustified dismissal, and access to health care, social and housing assistance.

The fifth title (Citizen's Rights) covers the rights of the EU citizens such as the right to vote in election to the European Parliament and to move freely within the EU. It also includes several administrative rights such as a right to good administration, to access documents and to petition the European Parliament.

The sixth title (Justice) covers justice issues such as the right to an effective remedy, a fair trial, to the presumption of innocence, the principle of legality, non-retrospectivity and double jeopardy.


So goodbye privacy, goodbye personal data protections, goodbye working conditions, goodbye equality


Now call me a skeptic, but I don't think the British government is planning on bringing back slavery. Isn't this just a case of these things are already covered in UK law so to avoid duplication they're getting rid of it here?

Or am I missing something and you are planning on bringing back slavery? :shifty:


I think we're more likely to get a massive reduction in workers rights rather than full on slavery. Imagine a case where companies didn't have to offer holiday or sick pay, no obligations to pay into pensions and no rights to appeal against unfair dismissals.

Amusement under late capitalism is the prolongation of work.
User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Brexit
by Squinty » Tue Jul 18, 2017 7:29 am

I think that's more likely. A relaxing of work rights to grab all dat money freed up by it.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Tue Jul 18, 2017 7:41 am

Slavery is obviously never coming back. But there are still plenty of nasty things that the government (or a future government) can do.

People have mentioned that laws can be relaxed that will allow employers to take even greater advantage of their employees but there are also things that the government can do to the unemployed. Things that would be really popular with the type of outraged “but they have flat screen TVs!!!!” types. How about making people work for their benefits? If there are no jobs, then they can do unpaid work for the good of the community, what do you mean they are disabled? I saw them walking! What if they work at the local factory and help stimulate the economy by allowing the business to profit from unpaid labour? They could even live onsite, saving us all money on the cost of rents! Nobody could moan at that, after all they are being fed! We could call it a workhouse…

User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Brexit
by Squinty » Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:12 am

I'm not even convinced that things like Steps 2 Success (or whatever it is called now) actually get people into employment. Would really like to see some data on that. Employers could just have a revolving door of free labour if not scrutinised.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:19 am

Squinty wrote:Employers could just have a revolving door of free labour if not scrutinised.


I think that’s the long term plan. The workhouse isn’t going to come back in the way it used to exist, but I can see the unemployed being forced to accept unpaid work in order to receive benefits. That’ll give certain companies little motivation to hire people, which will increase the numbers available for unpaid labour, which will increase profits and lead to even less employment, etc etc.

And a hell of a lot of people in this country will lap it up if it is marketed in the right way. It just needs the government and media to point at the lazy, workshy, benefit street types and people will be perfectly happy to force people into unpaid jobs.

User avatar
Blue Eyes
Member
Joined in 2011

PostRe: Brexit
by Blue Eyes » Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:51 am

So the Brexiters are the elitist banana splits? Well, strawberry float me!

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Tue Jul 18, 2017 11:00 am

Blue Eyes wrote:So the Brexiters are the elitist banana splits? Well, strawberry float me!


No not all of them. Some of them are racists. ;)

User avatar
Blue Eyes
Member
Joined in 2011

PostRe: Brexit
by Blue Eyes » Tue Jul 18, 2017 11:10 am

Moggy wrote:
Blue Eyes wrote:So the Brexiters are the elitist banana splits? Well, strawberry float me!


No not all of them. Some of them are racists. ;)

What?! I thought Brexit was about opening our country to the world beyond Europe whilst still retaining a tight bond with our continental neighbours!

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Tue Jul 18, 2017 11:15 am

Blue Eyes wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Blue Eyes wrote:So the Brexiters are the elitist banana splits? Well, strawberry float me!


No not all of them. Some of them are racists. ;)

What?! I thought Brexit was about opening our country to the world beyond Europe whilst still retaining a tight bond with our continental neighbours!


That’s right. That nice Mr Farage and his UKIP friends want to open our doors to the Commonwealth rather than Europe and they are going to be more than happy if that means more Indian, Pakistani, Jamaican, Samoan Kenyan and Rwandan people coming to the UK.

User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Brexit
by Squinty » Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:44 pm

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ed-at-66bn

We are gonna walk away from this one like a bunch of children.

User avatar
Lagamorph
Member ♥
Joined in 2010

PostRe: Brexit
by Lagamorph » Tue Jul 18, 2017 11:09 pm

Squinty wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/18/eu-talks-divided-over-britains-brexit-divorce-bill-mooted-at-66bn

We are gonna walk away from this one like a bunch of children.

Children could literally do a better job of negotiating this than the people we've got doing it at the moment.

Lagamorph's Underwater Photography Thread
Zellery wrote:Good post Lagamorph.
Turboman wrote:Lagomorph..... Is ..... Right
User avatar
Alvin Flummux
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Brexit
by Alvin Flummux » Wed Jul 19, 2017 1:37 am

Image

:lol:

Lagamorph wrote:
Squinty wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/18/eu-talks-divided-over-britains-brexit-divorce-bill-mooted-at-66bn

We are gonna walk away from this one like a bunch of children.

Children could literally do a better job of negotiating this than the people we've got doing it at the moment.


I don't understand how it is that the British government has spiraled down into such inept depths. It boggles the mind how utterly bereft of any ability at all, negotiating or otherwise, these people are.


Return to “Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 285 guests