Brexit

Fed up talking videogames? Why?

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

Remain a member of the European Union
201
79%
Leave the European Union
55
21%
 
Total votes: 256
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Hexx » Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:38 pm

Moggy wrote:
KK wrote:What always gets glossed over during all of this is how the EU is now going to fund the massive hole in their finances without the UK, Yunker having ruled out other EU countries needing to pay more. Put simply there are only 3 options on the table - either you get the UK to continue paying in, you get other member states to increase their yearly spend (i.e. Germany, France) of you start making cuts. So which is it going to be Yunker!


It makes me laugh how Leavers care so much about EU finances post Brexit.


It gets brought up so much because it feeds in the narrative delusion of "they need us more than we need then".

Of course now that's becoming "We'll the EU screwed us by not agreeing to our completely reasonable demands. But they screwed themselves more!!!! Bloody odd chap Pedro Foreigner"

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:39 pm


User avatar
BID0
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Essex

PostRe: Brexit
by BID0 » Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:43 pm

Moggy wrote:
KK wrote:What always gets glossed over during all of this is how the EU is now going to fund the massive hole in their finances without the UK, Yunker having ruled out other EU countries needing to pay more. Put simply there are only 3 options on the table - either you get the UK to continue paying in, you get other member states to increase their yearly spend (i.e. Germany, France) of you start making cuts. So which is it going to be Yunker!


It makes me laugh how Leavers care so much about EU finances post Brexit.

Simply put, it’s not really any of the UKs business how the EU is funded once Britain leaves.

But to answer you, I am not sure it’s the “massive hole” that you think it is. The UK is a net contributor, but we still received a lot of funding back. A quick Google search suggests there’ll be a €20billion gap after Brexit. Over 27 countries that’s not a lot to find.

It'll probably be covered by all of the extra business they get from us, like the entire financial sector moving to places like Ireland and Germany :lol:

User avatar
DML
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by DML » Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:44 pm

Denster wrote:It’s not a question she should or have to answer. It’s irrelevant.


Do you honestly believe that Denster? Come on! Shes the leader!

Image
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Hexx » Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:45 pm

DML wrote:
Denster wrote:It’s not a question she should or have to answer. It’s irrelevant.


Do you honestly believe that Denster? Come on! Shes the leader!


Look. It's completely unreasonable to ask the leader of the country to ask if she believes the country is following the best course of action.

User avatar
Errkal
Social Sec.
Joined in 2011
Location: Hastings
Contact:

PostRe: Brexit
by Errkal » Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:45 pm

If whether Farron thought bum sex was a sin was relevant then this is.

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Hexx » Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:50 pm

Errkal wrote:If whether Farron thought bum sex was a sin was relevant then this is.


That's the exact wording Newsnight used as well.

bear
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by bear » Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:59 pm

Denster wrote:I think a No deal is now a distinct possibility and I also think the EU has a large portion of the responsibility for that.

I respectfully disagree.


The prospect of No Deal is on the table because some silly bastards seem to think that this is the only opportunity the UK will get to negotiate with the EU for the next thirty bajillion years and are trying to undo fifty years of work in an eighteen month timeframe.

The sensible solution is to try and have a Norwegian style arrangement in place for when the UK is due to leave in 2019 and to then continue negotiations with the EU to achieve all the things the UK wants from Brexit. If that means European courts having jurisdiction in the UK past 2019 and well in to the 2020s then it's a small price worth paying compared to the economic disaster of a No Deal Brexit.

User avatar
jawafour
Member
Member
Joined in 2012

PostRe: Brexit
by jawafour » Wed Oct 11, 2017 4:23 pm

Hexx wrote:...Back benches basically lining up in to shout 'No deal! not cave to scummy foreigners!'
Hexx wrote:...Of course now that's becoming "We'll the EU screwed us by not agreeing to our completely reasonable demands. But they screwed themselves more!!!! Bloody odd chap Pedro Foreigner"
Hexx wrote:...UK voted stupidly for a bunch of lies peddled by largely racist demagogues...

Hexx, I like your enthusiasm and strong opinions but I feel they could be in danger of being tarnished when you use phrases such as those above.

jimbojango wrote:...I’m fairly sure the indicated flu strain from the Southern Hemisphere for this winter, coupled with the NHS staffing / too many old people conundrum is going to remove a big percentage of the leave vote anyway..

I get the tongue-in-cheek side of this, but I am wary of attempting to lay "blame" for the Brexit result on "old" people. Presumably that thinking would work both ways and one could be equally frustrated at how "young" people chose to vote / not vote?

I'm not looking to pick arguments; but a popular question in this thread is why "leavers" won't post here and I suspect that they won't if they feel they will be labelled as racist, stupid and old.

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Hexx » Wed Oct 11, 2017 4:38 pm

jawafour wrote:
Hexx wrote:...Back benches basically lining up in to shout 'No deal! not cave to scummy foreigners!'
Hexx wrote:...Of course now that's becoming "We'll the EU screwed us by not agreeing to our completely reasonable demands. But they screwed themselves more!!!! Bloody odd chap Pedro Foreigner"
Hexx wrote:...UK voted stupidly for a bunch of lies peddled by largely racist demagogues...

Hexx, I like your enthusiasm and strong opinions but I feel they could be in danger of being tarnished when you use phrases such as those above.

jimbojango wrote:...I’m fairly sure the indicated flu strain from the Southern Hemisphere for this winter, coupled with the NHS staffing / too many old people conundrum is going to remove a big percentage of the leave vote anyway..

I get the tongue-in-cheek side of this, but I am wary of attempting to lay "blame" for the Brexit result on "old" people. Presumably that thinking would work both ways and one could be equally frustrated at how "young" people chose to vote / not vote?

I'm not looking to pick arguments; but a popular question in this thread is why "leavers" won't post here and I suspect that they won't if they feel they will be labelled as racist, stupid and old.


I'm sure there's a leave support who's not racist, stupid and/or old.

But then I also believe in Ghosts. I've never met one of those either.

To answer your points in turn through :

1) That's what the back benches were saying! Sovereignty! Will of the British People! It mustn't be overidden by people in Brussels etc!"
2) See the BBC comments section on any Brexit Article, especially recently.
3) Find the majority of spokespeople for Leave fit that bit perfectly.

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Hexx » Wed Oct 11, 2017 4:45 pm

Now I don't do sports...but do you negotiate scoring points?

n an interview with Emma Barnett on Radio 5 Live Nick Clegg, the former Lib Dem leader and former deputy prime minister, said he was surprised by Theresa May’s refusal on LBC last night to answer the question about how she would vote in an EU referendum now. Clegg said:

I was a bit surprised. I thought she was going to say, ‘Yes, I voted remain then, but now I’m wholeheartedly for - ’, so on and so forth … That’s what I would have expected her to do ...

If you’re negotiating with someone, it’s very important that you negotiate with people who you think in their heart of hearts really believe what they’re doing.

It’s not a very good way of negotiating for a team, if the captain of the team doesn’t seem to be particularly persuaded that they want to stick the ball in the other net

User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Denster » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:02 pm

DML wrote:
Denster wrote:It’s not a question she should or have to answer. It’s irrelevant.


Do you honestly believe that Denster? Come on! Shes the leader!

Of a country that’s already decided. What does it matter what she’d vote now. It’s a moot point. One designed only to add further injury to her.
If she says yes she’d still remain - she does herself damage if she says leave - the same but from different quarters.
It’s a no win answer unless she refuses the question.

I applaud her for not answering. The fact that so many in here don’t means nothing

Moggy wrote:For £350m I'd join the Tory Party. :lol:
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:07 pm

Denster wrote:
DML wrote:
Denster wrote:It’s not a question she should or have to answer. It’s irrelevant.


Do you honestly believe that Denster? Come on! Shes the leader!

Of a country that’s already decided. What does it matter what she’d vote now. It’s a moot point. One designed only to add further injury to her.
If she says yes she’d still remain - she dies herself damage if she says leave - the same but from different quarters.
It’s a no win answer unless she refuses the question.

I applaud her for not answering. The fact that so many in here don’t means nothing


You’d applaud her if she literally shat in your mouth.

The question is perfectly fair. She was known as a Remainer. She’s now the Prime Minister in charge of Brexit that says “Brexit means Brexit” and “no deal is better than a bad deal”. She’s seen all of the reports that are not allowed to be shown to the public. It’s perfectly fair to ask what way she’d vote if the referendum was today.

And it’s painfully obvious that she’d still vote remain. Her job is to do the best for the country and yet she’s doing something she knows is going to be harmful.

User avatar
DML
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by DML » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:26 pm

Denster wrote:
DML wrote:
Denster wrote:It’s not a question she should or have to answer. It’s irrelevant.


Do you honestly believe that Denster? Come on! Shes the leader!

Of a country that’s already decided. What does it matter what she’d vote now. It’s a moot point. One designed only to add further injury to her.
If she says yes she’d still remain - she does herself damage if she says leave - the same but from different quarters.
It’s a no win answer unless she refuses the question.

I applaud her for not answering. The fact that so many in here don’t means nothing


The easy obvious answer is to back Brexit and say she would vote that way. Why wouldn't she? She's responsible for it!

I have never heard a leader not say they believe in what they are doing. I think it's a huge issue.

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:29 pm

So it’s relevant to ask Corbyn a hypothetical question on firing nukes at North Korea, but unreasonable to ask the Prime Minister in charge of Brexit if she’d vote for Brexit?

Denster wrote:
Hyperion wrote:How the strawberry float in 2017 are we still having questions about firing nuclear weapons


Because N. Korea are busily trying to build one and use it against others. It's still a relevant question.

User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Denster » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:34 pm

Completely different.

Moggy wrote:For £350m I'd join the Tory Party. :lol:
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:38 pm

Denster wrote:Completely different.


I agree.

Corbyn will never be Prime Minister so it’s ridiculous to ask him something like that.

May is Prime Minister and so it’s perfectly acceptable to ask her if she agrees with a policy that she is carrying out.

User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Denster » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:42 pm

Moggy wrote:
Denster wrote:
DML wrote:
Denster wrote:It’s not a question she should or have to answer. It’s irrelevant.


Do you honestly believe that Denster? Come on! Shes the leader!

Of a country that’s already decided. What does it matter what she’d vote now. It’s a moot point. One designed only to add further injury to her.
If she says yes she’d still remain - she dies herself damage if she says leave - the same but from different quarters.
It’s a no win answer unless she refuses the question.

I applaud her for not answering. The fact that so many in here don’t means nothing


You’d applaud her if she literally shat in your mouth.


And it’s these sort of comments that literally stop people from posting in here.

That’s what you get in a so called discussion thread. When you don’t agree with what is said and aren’t afraid to say it.
Crass comment and beneath you, Moggy.

Moggy wrote:For £350m I'd join the Tory Party. :lol:
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:51 pm

Denster wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Denster wrote:
DML wrote:
Denster wrote:It’s not a question she should or have to answer. It’s irrelevant.


Do you honestly believe that Denster? Come on! Shes the leader!

Of a country that’s already decided. What does it matter what she’d vote now. It’s a moot point. One designed only to add further injury to her.
If she says yes she’d still remain - she dies herself damage if she says leave - the same but from different quarters.
It’s a no win answer unless she refuses the question.

I applaud her for not answering. The fact that so many in here don’t means nothing


You’d applaud her if she literally shat in your mouth.


And it’s these sort of comments that literally stop people from posting in here.

That’s what you get in a so called discussion thread. When you don’t agree with what is said and aren’t afraid to say it.
Crass comment and beneath you, Moggy.


People stopped posting because they have zero logical arguments.

It’s not a discussion thread, they haven’t existed for a while now.

You are afraid to say some things, remember that you refuse to answer most political questions on the party you support?

Crass? Probably.

Beneath me? Nope.

And “literally gooseberry fool in your mouth” is far nicer a comment than you usually post, so there’s no need for the faux outrage.

User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Denster » Wed Oct 11, 2017 6:55 pm

Same old argument dug up again and again. At least you admit it’s crass but let’s agree that you’re right. It isn’t beneath you. Not anymore.
Let’s see how much worse you can get before we actually leave the EU. All in the name of debate of course.

Moggy wrote:For £350m I'd join the Tory Party. :lol:

Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: <]:^D, Bing [Bot], evanswolves, Finish.Last, Grumpy David, Irene Demova, Meep, Memento Mori, Nathanbrains, PurplePenguin, Return_of_the_STAR, Rhubarb, Shug5891, Skippy, Yahoo [Bot] and 60 guests