Brexit

Fed up talking videogames? Why?

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

Remain a member of the European Union
219
80%
Leave the European Union
56
20%
 
Total votes: 275
User avatar
DML
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by DML » Tue Jan 16, 2018 4:41 pm

Lucien wrote:
Blue Eyes wrote:
Lucien wrote:
Blue Eyes wrote:The decision is wrong, though. It is wrong because of those "negative consequences". Imagine if he said "yeah, you'll be alright without us I'm sure, but the door is always open for you to change your minds". That would have been condescending.


I thought you'd say that. You're too caught up in your subjective opinion of Brexit to see the more objective reality of Tusk's comment. If you remove your bias and think it's not disrespectful however that's fine.


Come off it. I suspect it's far more to do with your Brexit bias that you're somehow finding this tweet patronising.


I'd have found it patronising if any nation did it to another, and my opinion of the decision being right or wrong wouldn't matter. If Theresa May stood up and talked down a nation joining the EU (for example) I'd find it similarly disrespectful.


If thats your rule surely all politics is 'patronising', because all politics is about pushing a world view, whether you are a member of UKIP, the EU or the Labour party? Its so simplistic to call it patronising or disrespectful, because everyone pushes their own political agenda. To pretend the EU is pushing theirs and no-one else is can not be seen as anything BUT bias. I am not blind to Tusk pushing an agenda he wants to happen (because everyone does), but I have to put up with a Brexiteer agenda every waking day that I believe would have been better placed in a bin 18 months ago, so why shouldn't you be subjected to opposing views? I actively encourage the debate.

To start using words like traitorous, undermining etc....is just boiling politics down to a set of simplistic values, when politics is all about making hard calls every day. He can say anything he strawberry floating wants, as can May, Johnson, Gove.

Image
User avatar
Lucien
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Lucien » Tue Jan 16, 2018 5:49 pm

Karl wrote:Yeah, this is my bad. Usually when I use a hyperbolic example I get a chuckle and maybe people have a little think about why their position is so readily compared to absurd scenarios. But you've defeated me and I crown you King of Deliberately Misunderstanding Arguments on the Internet.


No need to be mildly aggressive. I got that you were using hyperbole. However your absurd scenarios share a trait with your view on Brexit, that being you should not get a vote on (the topic). I said they were nothing alike hoping you'd think about how worlds apart they are.

Karl wrote:1. No, Brexit isn't the same as a nuclear war. My point was that both of these things are or would be considered ridiculous by experts who understand them - as they are both pointless acts of petty nationalism that damage both us and our neighbours - and so neither should be put to plebiscite (to allow people who don't understand them to vote on them) in the first place.


I don't know what you mean. Brexit was about deciding how you want to be governed: a political expert can't tell you that.

Karl wrote:2. No, the UK isn't the same as North Korea. World leaders commenting on the actions of other world leaders and on other prominent geopolitical issues is a part of global politics. All the more so if those issues directly affect the people they represent or lead. This is why it's OK for the EU to continue to officially comment that they feel the UK is making a bad decision. It's also why it's OK for various world leaders to tell North Korea to do one.


Leaders can comment on things and I can find them disrespectful or otherwise, as can anyone.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:04 pm

I’m so glad that Lucien is again anal retentively micro analysing the least important points made while completely failing to see the points made.

User avatar
Karl
Daiakuma
Daiakuma
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Brexit
by Karl » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:06 pm

Lucien wrote:I don't know what you mean. Brexit was about deciding how you want to be governed: a political expert can't tell you that.

Decisions about the UK should be made in the UK!!!

...is a laughably naive position held exclusively by people who don't understand how international treaties work. Sorry if this is you, but it's the truth.

I'd be against offering this in a referendum even if it was 'all about sovereignty' (it wasn't) because it's based on a faulty understanding of how sovereignty works.

User avatar
Lucien
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Lucien » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:11 pm

Karl wrote:
Lucien wrote:I don't know what you mean. Brexit was about deciding how you want to be governed: a political expert can't tell you that.


Decisions about the UK should be made in the UK!!!

...is a laughably naive position held exclusively by people who don't understand how international treaties work. Sorry if this is you, but it's the truth.

I'd be against offering this in a referendum even if it was 'all about sovereignty' (it wasn't) because it's based on a faulty understanding of how sovereignty works.


You seem incapable of not being rude, so we'll end discussion there.

User avatar
Tomous
I Pissed My Pants
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Brexit
by Tomous » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:21 pm

Lucien wrote:
Karl wrote:
Lucien wrote:I don't know what you mean. Brexit was about deciding how you want to be governed: a political expert can't tell you that.


Decisions about the UK should be made in the UK!!!

...is a laughably naive position held exclusively by people who don't understand how international treaties work. Sorry if this is you, but it's the truth.

I'd be against offering this in a referendum even if it was 'all about sovereignty' (it wasn't) because it's based on a faulty understanding of how sovereignty works.


You seem incapable of not being rude, so we'll end discussion there.


Because you think Karl is being condescending and disrespectful?

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:23 pm

Tomous wrote:
Lucien wrote:
Karl wrote:
Lucien wrote:I don't know what you mean. Brexit was about deciding how you want to be governed: a political expert can't tell you that.


Decisions about the UK should be made in the UK!!!

...is a laughably naive position held exclusively by people who don't understand how international treaties work. Sorry if this is you, but it's the truth.

I'd be against offering this in a referendum even if it was 'all about sovereignty' (it wasn't) because it's based on a faulty understanding of how sovereignty works.


You seem incapable of not being rude, so we'll end discussion there.


Because you think Karl is being condescending and disrespectful?


All that rudeness and aggression from Lucien and he then accuses somebody else of it. :lol:

User avatar
Tafdolphin
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Tafdolphin » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:32 pm

Lucien wrote:
Karl wrote:
Lucien wrote:I don't know what you mean. Brexit was about deciding how you want to be governed: a political expert can't tell you that.


Decisions about the UK should be made in the UK!!!

...is a laughably naive position held exclusively by people who don't understand how international treaties work. Sorry if this is you, but it's the truth.

I'd be against offering this in a referendum even if it was 'all about sovereignty' (it wasn't) because it's based on a faulty understanding of how sovereignty works.


You seem incapable of not being rude, so we'll end discussion there.


Image

I'm almost tempted to take you off my ignore list after that clanger my man!

Goat wrote:Guy probably decided not to show up because he heard Taffy was a Cow-exploding fantasist mentalist.

Bloggy blog blog blog.
Newsletter!
User avatar
Lucien
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Lucien » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:46 pm

Moggy wrote:All that rudeness and aggression from Lucien and he then accuses somebody else of it. :lol:


Curious to see this aggression and rudeness I've displayed today? Especially if it's against Karl.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Tue Jan 16, 2018 6:58 pm

Lucien wrote:
Moggy wrote:All that rudeness and aggression from Lucien and he then accuses somebody else of it. :lol:


Curious to see this aggression and rudeness I've displayed today? Especially if it's against Karl.


I thought it was condescending and disrespectful. If you don't think it was then fair enough

User avatar
Skarjo
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Skarjo » Wed Jan 17, 2018 1:00 am

These few pages of utterly pointless and meaningless discussion about strawberry floating nothing of any importance while we tango towards oblivion is the perfect microcosm of Brexit.

Blue Eyes wrote:No wonder I'm eating my balls instead of sweets.

Skarjo's Scary Stories...
User avatar
Photek
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Dublin

PostRe: Brexit
by Photek » Wed Jan 17, 2018 12:49 pm


:fp:

The Irony meter has exploded.

Image
User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Brexit
by Squinty » Wed Jan 17, 2018 12:53 pm

Farage talking out of his bumhole again.

User avatar
Photek
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Dublin

PostRe: Brexit
by Photek » Wed Jan 17, 2018 1:50 pm

He gets onto Farage and Brexit at 8:42


Image
User avatar
DML
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by DML » Wed Jan 17, 2018 3:03 pm

If theres anything I dont understand about politics its why Farage is able to sit at that table. He even goes on about unelected types, and he himself has NEVER been elected! Why is he able to spew his bile in the most important meetings in Europe?

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Wed Jan 17, 2018 3:08 pm

DML wrote: he himself has NEVER been elected!


To be fair he has been elected to the European Parliament several times. It’s his beloved UK Parliament that he has always failed to get elected to.

User avatar
jawafour
Member
Member
Joined in 2012

PostRe: Brexit
by jawafour » Wed Jan 17, 2018 3:10 pm

.

Last edited by jawafour on Sat Jan 27, 2018 9:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DML
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by DML » Wed Jan 17, 2018 3:36 pm

Moggy wrote:
DML wrote: he himself has NEVER been elected!


To be fair he has been elected to the European Parliament several times. It’s his beloved UK Parliament that he has always failed to get elected to.


Why should he sit in Europe if hes never sat in the UK? Strange. Its like Tranmere qualifying for Europe.

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Wed Jan 17, 2018 3:40 pm

DML wrote:
Moggy wrote:
DML wrote: he himself has NEVER been elected!


To be fair he has been elected to the European Parliament several times. It’s his beloved UK Parliament that he has always failed to get elected to.


Why should he sit in Europe if hes never sat in the UK? Strange. Its like Tranmere qualifying for Europe.


What? That’s like asking why an MP should sit in Westminster if they have never sat on their local Parish council.

Edit:

And Tranmere have played in European competition.

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/fo ... o-11482429

User avatar
Rex Kramer
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by Rex Kramer » Wed Jan 17, 2018 3:43 pm

Moggy wrote:
DML wrote:
Moggy wrote:
DML wrote: he himself has NEVER been elected!


To be fair he has been elected to the European Parliament several times. It’s his beloved UK Parliament that he has always failed to get elected to.


Why should he sit in Europe if hes never sat in the UK? Strange. Its like Tranmere qualifying for Europe.


What? That’s like asking why an MP should sit in Westminster if they have never sat on their local Parish council.

Edit:

And Tranmere have played in European competition.

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/fo ... o-11482429

If we did that then the average age in the House of Commons would be about 50 years older than the House of Lords.


Return to “Stuff”