Brexit

Our best bits.

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

Remain a member of the European Union
222
80%
Leave the European Union
57
20%
 
Total votes: 279
User avatar
That
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by That » Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:13 pm

Scotland will riot.

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:14 pm

Photek wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Squinty wrote:How to keep NI in the customs union eh? Interesting.


Other than a united Ireland or an independent Northern Ireland, how can they possibly keep Northern Ireland in the customs union if the rest of the UK is not in it?

Customs border in the Irish Sea, treat the island as one.


That doesn’t work though does it?

Let’s say a UK business wants to import goods from an EU state, but don’t want to pay the pesky WTO tariffs that exist between the UK and the EU. Why wouldn’t the UK business just open up in Belfast so that they can get hold of the goods with no issues? Once (legally!) in Belfast, a business is surely allowed to operate freely in the rest of the UK?

The solution to the customs union problem seriously can’t be that there will be tariffs between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK. But how else would you stop it?

This whole thing gets more and more stupid.

User avatar
Garth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008
Location: Norn Iron

PostRe: Brexit
by Garth » Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:21 pm

twitter.com/labourlordsuk/status/913392703844610054


User avatar
Garth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008
Location: Norn Iron

PostRe: Brexit
by Garth » Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:28 pm

Moggy wrote:That doesn’t work though does it?

Let’s say a UK business wants to import goods from an EU state, but don’t want to pay the pesky WTO tariffs that exist between the UK and the EU. Why wouldn’t the UK business just open up in Belfast so that they can get hold of the goods with no issues? Once (legally!) in Belfast, a business is surely allowed to operate freely in the rest of the UK?

The solution to the customs union problem seriously can’t be that there will be tariffs between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK. But how else would you stop it?

This whole thing gets more and more stupid.

Maybe we should return to the idea of a land border policed by airships and an army of drones...

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:04 pm

Garth wrote:
Moggy wrote:That doesn’t work though does it?

Let’s say a UK business wants to import goods from an EU state, but don’t want to pay the pesky WTO tariffs that exist between the UK and the EU. Why wouldn’t the UK business just open up in Belfast so that they can get hold of the goods with no issues? Once (legally!) in Belfast, a business is surely allowed to operate freely in the rest of the UK?

The solution to the customs union problem seriously can’t be that there will be tariffs between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK. But how else would you stop it?

This whole thing gets more and more stupid.

Maybe we should return to the idea of a land border policed by airships and an army of drones...


I support Skynet and think Terminator’s on the border are the only real solution.

User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Brexit
by Squinty » Thu Sep 28, 2017 5:59 pm

There is no solution to the border at present. There will only be a solution if the EU eases off a bit, and allows the UK some kind of very special wiggle room. I don't think they will. And I would totally understand if they don't.

Hard border is looking very likely at this point. But who knows what will happen.

User avatar
Oblomov Boblomov
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mind Crime, SSBM_God

PostRe: Brexit
by Oblomov Boblomov » Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:07 am

Unsurprising bullshit response following the latest petition for a second referendum:

On 23 June 2016 the British people voted to leave the European Union. The UK Government is clear that it is now its duty to implement the will of the people and so there will be no second referendum.

The decision to hold the referendum was supported by a clear majority in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords. On 23 June 2016 the British people voted to leave the European Union. The referendum was the largest democratic mandate in UK political history. In the 2017 General Election more than 85% of people voted for parties committed to respecting that result.

There must be no attempts to remain inside the European Union, no attempts to rejoin it through the back door, and no second referendum. The country voted to leave the European Union, and it is the duty of the Government to make sure we do just that. Rather than second guess the British people’s decision to leave the European Union, the challenge now is to make a success of it - not just for those who voted leave but for every citizen of the United Kingdom, bringing together everyone in a balanced approach which respects the decision to leave the political structure of the EU but builds a strong relationship between Britain and the EU as neighbours, allies and partners.

Parliament passed an Act of Parliament with a clear majority giving the Prime Minister the power to trigger Article 50, which she did on 29 March in a letter to the President of the European Council, Donald Tusk. As a matter of firm policy, our notification will not be withdrawn - for the simple reason that people voted to leave, and the Government is determined to see through that instruction.

Both Houses of Parliament will have the opportunity to vote on the final agreement reached with the EU before it is concluded. This will be a meaningful vote which will give MPs the choice to either accept the final agreement or leave the EU with no agreement.

The people of the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union, but we are not leaving Europe. We want a deep and special partnership with the EU. We aim to get the right deal abroad and the right deal for people here at home. We will deliver a country that is stronger, fairer, more united and more outward-looking than ever before.

Department for Exiting the European Union


Wankers.

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:18 am

The only choice for MPs at the end will be to accept any deal that David Davis come up with ( :lol: ) or leave with no deal.

We are strawberry floated. :lol:

User avatar
Oblomov Boblomov
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mind Crime, SSBM_God

PostRe: Brexit
by Oblomov Boblomov » Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:30 am

How can they write "Rather than second guess the British people's decision..."

A second referendum would provide a clear, measurable answer to the decision of 'the British people'. How the strawberry float is that 'second guessing'?!

And throwing in a 'deep and special' at the end just to rub it in. strawberry floating pricks.

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:35 am

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:How can they write "Rather than second guess the British people's decision..."


Because the Leavers are in charge and calling the shots. To them any second referendum is anti-democratic and a disgraceful thing.

Or in other words, they suspect they would badly lose a second referendum and are never going to allow it to happen. Will of the people and all that.

User avatar
Drumstick
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Brexit
by Drumstick » Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:41 am

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:Unsurprising bullshit response following the latest petition for a second referendum:

We will deliver a country that is stronger, fairer, more united and more outward-looking than ever before.

Riiiiiiiiiiiight. :lol:

Who do they think they are kidding? The country is more divided now than perhaps at any other point in history.

Check out my YouTube channel!
One man should not have this much power in this game. Luckily I'm not an ordinary man.
Image Image Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Fri Sep 29, 2017 9:16 am

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:
In the 2017 General Election more than 85% of people voted for parties committed to respecting that result.


That bit really annoys me as it is so horribly misleading. People didn’t vote in the election based on Brexit, they voted on a huge range of issues.

Did they expect us all to vote for the Lib Dems? :slol:

User avatar
massimo
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Brexit
by massimo » Fri Sep 29, 2017 9:43 am

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/brexit-poses-substantial-threat-to-every-part-of-the-nhs-lancet-study-claims_uk_59cd3b28e4b0ef0694272180

“We conclude that each scenario poses substantial threats. The workforce of the NHS is heavily reliant on EU staff . Financing of health care for UK citizens in the EU and vice versa is threatened, as is access to some capital funds, while Brexit threatens overall economic performance. Access to pharmaceuticals, technology, blood, and organs for transplant is jeopardised. Information used for international comparisons is threatened, as is service delivery, especially in Northern Ireland.


I hope any Brexic*nts enjoy reading that.

User avatar
Lagamorph
Member ♥
Joined in 2010

PostRe: Brexit
by Lagamorph » Fri Sep 29, 2017 10:13 am

The referendum was the largest democratic mandate in UK political history.

Bullshit. It was non-binding and had/gave no mandate whatsoever.

Last edited by Lagamorph on Fri Sep 29, 2017 10:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lagamorph's Underwater Photography Thread
Zellery wrote:Good post Lagamorph.
Turboman wrote:Lagomorph..... Is ..... Right
User avatar
Errkal
Member
Joined in 2011
Location: Hastings
Contact:

PostRe: Brexit
by Errkal » Fri Sep 29, 2017 10:14 am

If it was a democratic mandate why did you do an election to gain a mandate?

User avatar
Oblomov Boblomov
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mind Crime, SSBM_God

PostRe: Brexit
by Oblomov Boblomov » Fri Sep 29, 2017 10:37 am

Moggy wrote:
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:
In the 2017 General Election more than 85% of people voted for parties committed to respecting that result.


That bit really annoys me as it is so horribly misleading. People didn’t vote in the election based on Brexit, they voted on a huge range of issues.

Did they expect us all to vote for the Lib Dems? :slol:

The more you read the full response the worse it gets.

And yes, everyone should have voted Lib Dem!

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Brexit
by Moggy » Fri Sep 29, 2017 10:39 am

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:
In the 2017 General Election more than 85% of people voted for parties committed to respecting that result.


That bit really annoys me as it is so horribly misleading. People didn’t vote in the election based on Brexit, they voted on a huge range of issues.

Did they expect us all to vote for the Lib Dems? :slol:

The more you read the full response the worse it gets.

And yes, everyone should have voted Lib Dem!


But nobody was going to vote Lib Dem due to their Clegg history and so people voted Con/Lab.

User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Brexit
by Squinty » Fri Sep 29, 2017 10:55 am

Brexshit continues to impress.

Edit - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 72596.html

LOL.

User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: Brexit
by KK » Fri Sep 29, 2017 12:25 pm

This should have all been discussed before the referendum. I actually agreed with Peter Hitchens last night on Question Time when he said we should have had the general election with a referendum plan being in place, rather than calling a referendum, people not in power coming up with all these suggestions and ideals, and then having nobody in power to take responsibility for the result. The only plan in place was for when we Remained.

There was a mandate for a Brexit, but not what type of Brexit. There was no details on that paper other than In or Out. Everything else was pure conjecture and speculation, and hopes and dreams of what you could theoretically do. Cameron and Osborne had no plan to implement any Out vote, and then ran away.

Image
User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Brexit
by Squinty » Fri Sep 29, 2017 12:42 pm

This is maybe just me, but I don't understand how you can have a clear mandate on a referendum built on a foundation of lies and misinformation. Both sides talked absolute shite. I've said it before about the lack of troubleshooting with Brexit.

Second referendum on how this ends up is the only logical conclusion.


Return to “Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 204 guests